Full name quantification is an important research topic for semantics, especially formal semantics，It is often implemented by full -name quantitative words。Full names such as "per" in Chinese are regarded as a full -name quantitative word in Chinese。But，Chinese full -name quantified words are using conditions、There are obvious differences from English in total.。For this，Some scholars have questioned the quantitative attributes of the full -name quantification of Chinese。So，What is the essence of modern Chinese full -name quantified words? How to explain the differences in quantitative words in full names of Chinese and English?

To make a reasonable explanation of the above problems，It is particularly important to adopt the correct academic research orientation。In recent years, the emerging new description of academic ideas in recent years is quite inspiring。New descriptionism advocates fine granular language factual description，Pay attention to the selection of theoretical tools，Pay attention to cross -language comparison，Reveal the commonality and differences of language through micro descriptions and portrayal。This academic values，Following our research goals，It helps to explore the semantics of the full -name quantified Chinese word。So，This project is under the vision of new descriptions，The above problems are oriented，A systematic and in -depth study of the full quantification of modern Chinese。

　bet365 live casino games

We carry out large -scale collation and analysis of CCL and BCC corpus bet365 live casino games corpus in the CCC corpus library，At the same time, refer to the corpus in the corpus and other corpus such as the Chinese -language compound sentence、The results of the sense of text and the description of the literature。Micro description of the facts of related language facts is indeed conducive to our correct semantic interpretation of the full name quantification。For example，Only observe some common cases，It is easy to get such inferences: General full -name quantitative words are left -to -be associated。and when a large number of corpus is examined，It will be found that some members such as "one" and "all" are related to the right to associate。

Accurate description is important for semantic analysis。Analysis based on detailed observation and description can be more explained，The theoretical model established in order to better cover related language phenomena。

In terms of theoretical tool selection，Compared with the existing theory，We think that formal semantics is an effective theory of analyzing full -name quantitative words。This theory is widely used in quantitative research in English，The theory of a broad quantity word、Three -point structure theory、Mixed analysis method, etc. can help deepen the study of modern Chinese full -name quantified words。This study discusses the full quantification of Chinese in this theoretical framework，Flows to make a reasonable theoretical interpretation。

　　Deepening individual analysis and attach importance to category research

The discussion of the full quantification of modern Chinese in the literature is based on individual research。"Each" and "Du" as representatives of the limited and modified full -name quantification, respectively，The most attention they receive，The discussion is relatively bet365 best casino games sufficient，The controversy is also quite large。and modern Chinese full name quantified words more，Each word has its own characteristics，Can't simply apply existing related research conclusions to analyze。In the comparative study of previous name quantification words，Comparison objects are usually limited to a few words such as "Capital" and "Total"，Lack of universality。

Discussion on typical members in the category can undoubtedly enhance the understanding of the member's own semantics，At the same time, it also helps to form a preliminary understanding of the entire category。But，If you want to have a comprehensive and systematic understanding of this category，It is not enough to discuss only the individual members。The overall study of the semantic category of full -name quantitative words has achieved certain results，But some of the important features of the full name quantified words have not been reflected，It failed to form a complete set of theories。

For this，We choose more than 40 full -name quantitative words commonly used in modern Chinese for detailed analysis。According to the location of the sentence, the sub -class division，Discuss the members of each category one by one，Explore its semantics; compare each member inside the category，Find out its similarity and differences，Then summarizes the semantics of such categories。Based on this，Summarize the common characteristics and differences of all categories of all -name quantified words，Finally sorted out the overall semantic semantics of the full -name quantified word。

Overall analysis for categories also helps the semantics of their internal members。Take "Capital" as an example。"Du" is a hot topic of semantics research，The most controversy in its bet365 Play online games semantics，There are many different interpretation solutions。This is the reason why this happens，In addition to the complexity of the semantics of "Du"，An important reason is that the overall characteristics and essence of the full -name quantification of Chinese in Chinese lack of understanding。According to analysis, it can be known that "Du 1" has the characteristics of general full -name quantified words，It is regarded as a full -name quantification is reasonable。General full -name quantitative nibs do not have the internal exclusive features，"Du 1" is not an exception as a member。So，The common semantic characteristics of general full -name quantitative words can be used as "capital" and do not have exclusive proof。From this，It can be inferred that when there is a comparison focus on the right of "Du"，Election does not originate from the "capital" and originated from the focus of the contrast. This analysis is more reasonable。

　Respect the Chinese "personality" and the commonality of the language

In view of the significant difference between the full quantification of Chinese and Britain，A full quantitative research results based on English language facts cannot be directly applied to Chinese。For this，Scholars have given two explanations: one is，Persevere words in Chinese are full -name words in Chinese is a full -name quantitative word，Try to explain the reasons for the difference between the existence of the full -name quantified words in English。Another is，Give "Every" and "Du" and other semantic interpretations other than quantitative words。

This study is based on Chinese facts，Using formal semantics theory to explore the essence of modern Chinese full name quantification，Try to explain the commonality and differences of the full name of Chinese and English from the perspective of language type。

Research indicates，The semantic essence of the Bet365 app download so -called full -name quantitative word in Chinese is not the same。Modern Chinese -A -type full name quantification is the real full name quantification，Occupy the dominant position in the process of quantifying the full name，It includes two types of decorative and complement full name quantified words。The so -called limited (ie, type D) full name of Chinese language is not essentially quantified，Instead or the maximum value of the son。They are one yuan operator，Exclusive or maximum value operation of the associated objects，Make it full name interpretation。The so -called floating (ie F type) full -name quantified words in Chinese mainly include "all" and other。Although they have more than one possible sentence position，But the semantic nature is not the same when you are in different sentences，Therefore, modern Chinese does not really have a full name quantified word。

From the perspective of the type,，Similar to Chinese and English，Both type A full name quantified words are widely used to express full name quantification; unlike English is，Chinese is a language that lacks limited full name quantified words。

Full name quantification、Adding operator and maximum value for the best value can be collectively referred to as full name words，They produced in different historical periods，The full name at the current level of time is the product that is durable。Adding phrases and maximum value phrases can provide quantitative domains for full name。Integration of the location of the modified language/maximum value forces can be used to limit the range of its associated objects，Give it to the maximum semantics。Two or more full -name quantified words are available for time，They have their own Bet365 lotto review semantic division of labor。

Full names of semantics and quantity allows speakers to have more selectivity when expressing，Make the meaning of the table more fine、Rigidity。The common name of the full name will increase the expression of language，It plays a role in strengthening the expression effect。For this，English，Full Chinese name expression means rich，All name words are very common。

The semantics of the full quantification of modern Chinese in the world，We know more clearly，Semantics research should be selected for effective theoretical tools，Under the premise of fully observing and detailed description of language facts，Discussion on related issues。Simply portraying language phenomena without theoretical analysis or blindly emphasizing theoretical high and ignoring language facts，None of the ways of semantics research。And，When analyzing，We must respect the personality of Chinese，Also consider the commonality of the language。The language type of Chinese should be placed in the type of vision to inspect，Talking about Chinese characteristics based on English only，It is inevitable that there are bias。Blind theory to blindly apply the theory to make a consistency interpretation of Chinese and English，Excessive additional special setting，It will inevitably increase the complexity of explanation，This is not proper。Our research and practice indicates，The academic research orientation advocated by the new descriptionism has a positive significance for studying Chinese semantics，It is worth learning and promoting。　　

　(The author is the head of the State Social Science Foundation Project "Research on Modern Chinese Full -Names and Quantitative Prelimable Research"、Associate Professor of the School of Literature of Northeast Normal University)