Western cultural leadership theoretical discourse paradigm limitation
June 27, 2019 08:37 Source: "Chinese Social Sciences" June 27, 2019, No. 1722, author: Zhang Yanzi

The victory of the October Revolution in Russia disintegrated the second international "economic decision theory",But this successful experience has not successfully promoted the Western proletarian revolutionary movement,This prompted a group of Western Marxists to turn the revolutionary path of the West to the Weiwei,Open the theoretical construction and practice exploration of cultural leadership transformation。

 bet365 best casino games

As the earliest Grandi, which proposed the theory of cultural leadership,,believes that "political parties should have more or less members,It has a high or low level,But this is not the key。The important thing is its functions in leadership and organization,The role of education and intelligence "。Therefore,He hopes to get out of a "civic society" as the basis、Revolutionary road with non -compulsory cultural leadership with "organic intellectuals" as the main body。He regards culture as "the niece of practice",Think of the progress of human society、The development of history is not just depending on objective material activity creation,To a higher degree, it is a process of scientific activities,Is continuously overturning thoughts、The process of renovation,Is a gradual conscious action。This development idea does make up for the lack of fields in the practice of revolutionary practice in the second international theory and the role of upper -level architecture,Breaking the dogmatic understanding of the role of economic Bet365 lotto review foundation,Make the criticism of capitalism in cultural practice。

But,Excessive conceptual discussion of "practice" itself,Especially the foundation of upper -level buildings such as culture as the basis of change,The result can only be the material production movement with the reality、Revolutionary way to leave。In Marxist scientific theory,Practice is the real and regular activity of the purpose and regularity of the subject and object,The performance of practical functions and the motivation of historical development comes from the creation of material production power,Material production method determines the spirit、Cultural and other upper -level buildings changes in the development and development,Culture and other upper -level buildings plays a role in accelerating or delaying social development,Advanced cultural development theory guidance、Promoting the society to move forward more advanced,The backward and decaying culture hinders the generation of more positive factors。

So,The development of the revolutionary development is bound to be carried out in the activity of material creation,The linkage effect of cultural leaders is by no means to be completed in the environment of the economic foundation.。Grandis's cultural leadership theory is just as Mastero said,"If Grandis can work in a free world rather than in prison,Then his ‘Those Moisturizing or Practicing Thoughts、Questions and doubts,May find a different way of expression "。Visible,Cultural leadership theory without economic basic support obviously lacks the foundation of the discourse system,Lack of real operability,It is not possible to complete social change。Therefore,Only return to reality bet365 best casino games to go,Looking for revolutionary strategies in the soil that bred culture。

  dispute between homogeneity and heterogeneity

In the modernization process of capital globalization,The theory of leadership of mainstream cultural rights in the West will inevitably have the tendency to have the concept of capitalist value,Its starting point and settlement point always revolves around the consolidation of capitalist production methods、Maintenance of Capital Freedom,and this freedom is the center of radioactive and spread to various fields,Make the entire society serving it,Provide and create conditions for the free flow of capital。

For individuals,The freedom of capital meets the desire of personal freedom,To a certain extent, the characteristics of the two have reached the fit。For society,Infinite expansion of capital has become a huge power for productivity development,It makes the demand of the public increasingly homogeneous,In the kingdom chased by wealth, you don't think about Shu。The production of cultural industry makes the public's words and cultural communication mechanisms tend to advocate the bourgeois will,Where the working class,The will of the Revolution is eliminated,A community of coexistence and coexistence with the bourgeoisie,Class opposition is increasingly disappeared。This capitalist society shows the superiority of the super society ever,Especially the fact that the disintegration of the Soviet Union makes politicians advocating capitalism more convinced,The real world is the world of capitalism,Capitalist cultural leadership theory with freedom as the core is the most reasonable cultural leadership theory in existing society。It is in this sense,Fushan and others made a "end of history" conclusion,believes "in the development bet365 Play online games model of all society,There is a basic program that plays a role,This is the general history of human beings in the direction of the free democracy system "。The confrontation and confrontation of multiculturalism are temporary,Although there are disadvantages in the capitalist society,But it still cannot be ignored its role in historical evolution,The inevitable logic of the discourse system of cultural leadership theory is the unity of the logic of capitalization。but,Reflection of quiet view,Does the globalization of capital mean the integration of capitalist cultural leadership theory? Is this word of cultural leadership theory suitable for all society?,Fushan's discourse expression consciously involved in the ideology of capital logic,Incorporate the subject into the one -dollar narrative structure dominated by capital,This is the criticism of Marxism's materialist view。This "linear" cultural leadership theory is the trick of modern capitalist ideology,Vague the essence of private ownership,and hidden the cross -connection of mutual factors under this vagueness and contact with the external contact,Ignoring the objective existence of the multicultural differences of various ethnic groups in the world,Is a cultural hegemony、narrow epistemology and universalism of wishful thinking。

So,Cultural leadership theory with universalist characteristics faces the cultural heterogeneity of various nations,It will inevitably be questioned。Huntington thinks,"Due to modern incentives,Global politics is reconstruction along the boundary of culture。Ethnic and countries with similar culture come together,Ethnic and countries with different cultures bet365 Play online games part ways。Alliance determined by ideological and superpower relations allows alliances located in culture and civilization,Re -divided political boundaries are getting more and more with race、Religious、The boundary of the culture of civilization and other culture tends to be consistent,Cultural Community is replacing the Cold War camp,The fault line between civilization is becoming the central line of global political conflict "。Culture has become a world order、The important force of the development of social structure,The prospect of the theory of cultural leadership is diversified,And this non -single cultural leadership theory plays a special role on the international stage,Deeply affects the political development orientation of various countries,It may even form hostile with the mainstream culture countries in the process of seeking its own development,Treatment of contradictions and conflicts,This is positive for weakening the theoretical of the theory of leadership of capitalist cultural leadership。But,Cultural leadership theory, as Hennington said,Is it inevitable that it is not integrated? Is capitalist cultural leadership theory and other cultural leadership theories that is the same relationship?,How can we make this difference and realize the discourse identity of cultural leadership theory? What kind of cultural leadership theoretical discourse system will be built?

  Dialectic development and innovation

Western cultural leadership theories have different opinions,Whether it is cultural hegemony or civilized conflict theory,All can be effectively located within a limited space -time range and says it。When facing the development of the entire social history,bet365 live casino games Facing China in the global context,Cultural leadership theoretical discourse paradigm obviously cannot directly apply Western,Instead, start from the actual situation of China。Both the irrationality of those theories,It is also necessary to consider the practical significance of practice; it is necessary to pursue the existing historical root,Reflected ethnicity,It is also necessary to surpass the limit of space,Gives world significance; it must rely on rational tools,It cannot be contrary to the main value。

Today in the new era,Cultural leadership theory of Chinese characteristics will follow the continuous development of socialist roads with Chinese characteristics、The system is continuously improved、The continuous enrichment of theory and the prosperity of culture are increasingly innovative。This innovation needs to treat traditional and modernity with dialectical thinking、The relationship between localization and globalization,Implement the recognition of discourse ways; promote the sustainable development of society with strategic thinking and avoid development risks,Exploring the growth point of the discourse content;,Grasp the laws of social basic contradictions and the trend of world historical development,Maintain the forward -looking discourse subject; break linear cognition with space thinking,Freedom of the relationship between reconstruction of communication,Openness of the discourse environment,While saying "China's position",Contribute "China Wisdom"。

  (Author Unit: Philosophy Teaching and Research Department of the Party School of the Jiangsu Provincial Party Committee of the Communist Party of China)

Editor in charge: Zhang Yueying
QR code icon 2.jpg
Key recommendation
The latest article
Graphics
bet365 live casino games

Friendship link: Official website of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences |

Website filing number: Jinggong.com Anmi 11010502030146 Ministry of Industry and Information Technology: Beijing ICP No. 11013869

All rights reserved by China Social Sciences Magazine shall not be reprinted and used without permission

General Editor Email: zzszbj@126.com This website contact information: 010-85886809 Address: Building 1, Building, No. 15, Guanghua Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing: 100026