For a long time，Eastern European New Marxism has always been accused，so that its special theoretical significance has not been fully recognized and revealed by the academic community。From the mainstream point of view，This is mainly based on the facts of two aspects。One，Eastern European New European Marxism and Western Marxism are derived from the theoretical turning of Marxist theory created by Lucari，Therefore, there are certain similarities in the purpose of the two。Its two，Eastern European New Marxism became "past" for specific historical reasons，Except the Budapest School，Other theories have not been able to get real inheritance as a genre。

but，The creativity of a theory is not only reflected in whether it can be used as a formal "genre"，It is more reflected in the reality of its historical logic。In fact，Eastern European New Marxism and Western Marxism have a certain difference in historical logic。This also makes it impossible for the two to be absolutely equivalent，and，This is still from Lukach。Lucari is opening up with the turning of Marxist theory，Double paths that have formed a cultural criticism and political and economic criticism。Although in his opinion，For Marxism，In the final analysis, there is no independent law、Political Economics、History science, etc.，There is only one unique、Unified、History、Dialectically scientific science on society (as the overall) development，But the two points between methodology and ontology，But the core position of the overall methodology is related to the priority of the economy。Therefore，Different from Western Marxism，Eastern European New Marxism is in the face of the dilemma of Lucic theory，Always try to unify cultural criticism with political and economic criticism based on the historical practice of socialism，bet365 best casino games and finally formed the theoretical concept of "humanitarian socialism"。Cosk's specific dialectical thinking is one of the important embodies of this historical logic。

　bet365 Play online games

Among the main representatives of the new Marxism in Eastern Europe，Kosick has always enjoyed a very high theoretical status and international reputation，Its masterpiece "Specific Dialectics -Research on People and World Issues" is even considered to be with Lucarcic's "Study on History and Class I -Research on Marxist Dialectics"，and also show deep insights on cultural criticism。

Although Lukaccic is a recognized start of Marxist cultural critical steering，But this logic has been contained in Marx's old age，In other words，How to correctly treat and deal with capitalism. The first sexual problem of capitalism is an important theoretical proposition of Marx's old age.。Marx further developed the historical view of materialism in his later years，Through the inspection of the Asian production method -the dual characteristics of the rural commune with public ownership and private ownership，revealed the real path generated by the public ownership as an intermediary to the world history，is the idea of ​​crossing the "Kafding Canyon"，Therefore, another possibility of historical development was found on the basis of "German Ideology"，and show the theoretical dimension of Western centralized。For this，Marx severely criticized the privatization process of the "stupid donkey" (British colonizer) in the Indian colony。But，Due to the reality of the historical development of Western capitalistism, it is first equivalent to the inevitability of history，Therefore，The historical path that is different must be clarified first。In this sense，Cultural critical shift is the logic of Marx's thought development，and finally constitute the theme of the new Eastern European New European Marxism and Western Marxism, which began in Lukach。

Different from Lukacic, which is deeply influenced by Hegel，Cosk continues the theoretical tradition of phenomenology -existentialism，bet365 Play online games But it is consistent with Lukaci，In the re -interpretation of Marx's dialectics，Discipline of the mysterious or materialized world，and start their overall criticism。From the perspective of Kosik，Putting the objective refers to objectivity，Is the essential characteristics of the pseudo -specific world。On the surface, it is just a conversion of the perspective，In fact, it is a replacement of reality，that is, the objective reality replaces objective reality。Nature in the physical sense concept social reality，Concealing economic science according to social physics。Therefore，Objective reality has become an objective reality，Become a world of object。Fundamental speaking，This pseudo -specific world produces revolutionary、Lost of critical practice，As a result, daily utilitarian practice and the daily thinking that they produce have historic practice and people's 僭 僭，Make people and their own historical relationship -this relationship exists in the specific overall world，In the final analysis, it is in the historical practice of human revolutionary -the relationship between people and the outside world。The result is that the overallness of the person's historicity disappears in the real world and the world of concepts。Therefore，Cosk pointed out，Destroy this pseudo -specific world back to the "self -auto" -the general world found in history and the exploring of people who exist in this world，Itself means a general cultural criticism。

　　Extension of Cultural Criticism to Political Economy

Wish to know，On the issue of the realization of capitalism in the problem of sexual reality，In his later years, Marx proposed the "all positive results" that possess capitalist production in the recovery of Zhaolica。but，Marx also proposed that ethnic groups that still retain the Asian production method must exclude the destructive effects from all aspects to it，Then ensure that it has normal conditions for natural development。In other words，The investigation of history must start from the actual conditions or objectiveness of the Bet365 app download specific nation。But，When Lucari regards "materialization" equivalent to objectization，In essence is a kind of alienation of society into a eternal "human condition"，Ontology and methodology、The division between cultural criticism and political and economic criticism is unavoidable。Therefore，Also dedicated to overall cultural criticism，The difference between the historical dialectics of Lucarcic and the specific dialectics of Coskk is here to appear here。

From Lucari's view，Only those who pass the "intermediary" are natural，that is the nature of aesthetics -this is also the historical relationship of universality and particularity in the perspective of ethics。but，Kosick pointed out，Results of human practice，The meaning of the ontology of nature is not covered by the objectification of utilitarian practice and its concept。Cosk thinks，The pseudo -specific world is a derived world，It essentially，It is a world that is mysterious and enlightened by utilitarian practice and daily thinking。Although this world still emphasizes some of the overallness -the overall hollow、Abstract overall and evil.，The overallness of the history of the real world is completely forgotten here。Then，Cosick will extend to the political and economic field，Deeply revealing the fact that people are degraded into economics in economics。but，Cosk did not stop at the abstract criticism of the economics people，Instead, in the historical perspective, constantly questioning the prerequisite for economics，and reveal the self -splitting and downgrade of people in the relationship between economics and people。Only under the capitalist system，Economics can develop into a science，Therefore，Special Disciplines that describe regular descriptions of economic phenomena，Economics can no longer be equivalent to the economic reality itself，but the results of the systemic concept -mystery and worship education，It also constitutes the prerequisite for economics，Only in the relationship between people and economics，Economic talents can become possible。So far，Cosk is bet365 live casino games the same as Marx，Start from another perspective，Basically and premise subverting classical economics。means，Economists who are the foundation of classical economics assume that the result of economics is precisely the result of economics，It is the emergence of economics that completes the real existence of human beings to economic people。

　　A criticism for open history

The "self" found by Kosick is the overall world found in history and the people who exist in the overall world，Revolutionary、Critical practice is the field of human existence，It is also the creation of the true nature of human beings.。The direction of practice is manifested as an openness，The formation process of history and reality，Therefore，Cosk's specific dialectics is both the process of self -display of the "auto"，At the same time, it is also a way to explore the "self -auto" -the ontology and methodology split by Lukacic is unified in specific dialectics。

As one of the main representatives of Eastern European New Marxist theory，Cosk's specific dialectics shows this unique historical logic of this theory，That is, a general cultural criticism must contain the dimension of political and economic criticism，At the same time, the process of the overall self -display of the historicity is also inevitable in the methodology -the theoretical form of the process is among them (the humanitarian dialectics of the Yugoslavia practice is also the same as this)。Although Lukacci realized this，But he in "History and Class Awareness -Research on the Research on Marxist Dialectics" eventually hindered his original intention。

As Lukacic said，"Study on History and Class Awareness -Research on the Dialectics of Marxism" is a major、A theoretical expression that the world's historical transformation strives to find。Therefore，Lucarh's ideological contradiction at this time is not a pure "subjective mistake"。Complex relationships in the ideological context of Marx in old age -socialism and capitalism、The relationship between national history and world history，For Western Marxism is a question of theoretical criticism，For socialist countries bet365 Play online games in Eastern Europe，The first is to be a practical problem of the theoretical foundation。In this way，Eastern Europe's New Marxism itself is the expression form of historical practice。Therefore，Different from Western Marxism，The critical theory of the New European New Marxism is always in the national cultural heritage of humanitarianism，Open development path for history for history。

　　Eastern European New Marxism Research

Continue to continue in contemporary

Just as Engels's English version of the "All Society of Society" in 1888 in 1888，"This refers to all history recorded in text。in 1847，The prehistoric history of society、Social Organizations before the History of Literature，Almost no one knows it yet "。Marx has proposed the two concepts of "Asia's ownership form" and "Asian production method" during 1857-1859，Marx not only recognizes the differences between the oriental world and the western world，and finally put forward the important idea of ​​crossing the "Kavin Gorge"。In this way，Marx's old age and "German Ideology", "Communist Declaration", "Capital Theory", "Criticism of Gosa Program" and other works.，For understanding Marxism -theory and practice -the development of the 20th century and the diversification of its form。Reflection of theoretical on different historical situations，In a certain sense，Many forms of Marxism are the result of this logic。

It is not difficult to find，Historical experience of the era of Sinicization of Marxism，is theoretical and practice、Cultural critical and political and economic criticism、In the historical perspective of the unity of the nation and the world，Successfully solved and responded to the problems indicated by Marx's later years，Then in the process of "two combinations", a new form of human civilization is formed。At the same time，Based on this，Many forms of Marxism also have the possibility of comparative research beyond simple specific views。Therefore，Once the difference between the new Marxism of Eastern Europe and the historical logic of Western Marxism in the West，It is also easy to cover the unique historical Bet365 lotto review value of its theory。Words，Compared with the Marxism and Western Marxism of the Soviet Union，Eastern European New Marxism is more focused on the process of diversification in world history and its internal unity、Cultural critical and political and economic criticism or socialist self -discarding (reform) context responds to the problems left by Marx's old age，and creatively develop a localized Marxist theoretical form。

In this sense，In the relationship between the possibility and reality of history，Further explore the experience and problems of the new Marxism in Eastern Europe，It will be of great significance to understand the law of the localization law of Marxism in the world。

　(The author is a professor at Marxist College of Yunnan University for Nationalities)