Thinking of the Evaluation of Philosophy and Social Sciences
December 14, 2021 10:01 Source: "Journal of Social Sciences" 2021, December 14, 2308 Author: Ge Xinquan

With the progress of social civilization,Philosophy and Social Sciences and its research is becoming more and more important。But,At present, there are still many problems in the evaluation of achievements in Chinese philosophy and social sciences,attracted high attention from all walks of life。Therefore,We need to deeply reflect on academic evaluation related issues,to accelerate the construction of a philosophy and social science with Chinese characteristics。

First,Evaluation Principles。Just as "Wenwu No. 1,Wuwu No. 2 ",The evaluation of the achievements of social sciences is not unified、The only standard,Show diversified features。For the same results,At different times、Different situations,The evaluation results of different evaluations may be different; or those with the same evaluation at different times、Evaluation results of different situations may also be different,Even the opposite。But bet365 best casino games in the evaluation of the achievements of philosophy and social sciences,Correct academic attitude、Responsibility for academic responsibility、Observe academic specifications,It is a common requirements that should be followed。

Second,Evaluation perspective。The characteristics of philosophy and social sciences are characterized by,For the same question,Even if the research purpose is the same,Different researchers will also break the problem based on their own advantages and specialties、Carry out research,The features of "fighting for mirror"。In the project review、Achievement review,Journal paper、Degree Thesis、bet365 best casino games in the evaluation of the research report,Some evaluators often evaluate the results only from their own perspective and logic,This is a bias,It is also not desirable; there are also viewers who find out the point of view of some achievements、Thought、Theory、Conclusion or suggestion is inconsistent with yourself,Just criticize,It is also not desirable。Therefore,When evaluation,Evaluations need to adhere to the attitude of science,Explanation and analysis bet365 best casino games from an objective perspective,In full respect and understanding the author's point of view、The information and methods used、The logical analysis and reasoning unfolded,Evaluation of it,Make sure the accuracy of academic evaluation、Justice。During the evaluation process,​​It also needs to consider the viewpoint of its research、Thought、Whether the conclusion is novel、Whether it has value,and whether the policy suggestions are recommended to solve practical problems,Or provide a new perspective or support support for the future solving problem。

again,Evaluation focus。When evaluating,,For different types of research results,It should be given to other categories of inspections。The results of basic theoretical research,We should focus on their academic value and academic contributions;,Then we should focus on the targetedness of solving the actual problems、operability and effectiveness。But,Regardless of basic theoretical research or application countermeasure research,The focus of academic evaluation lies in content,instead of form。Current,Thesis is still the main form of bet365 Play online games scientific research results of most scientific researchers。The main carrier of the theoretical results,The paper should reflect the thinking, analysis and summary improvement of scientific researchers in the theoretical innovation process。According to long -term experience,Commonly used text paradigms for the academic literacy of scientific researchers、Academic norms and academic abilities are indispensable。But in reality,Some scholars often pay too much attention to the papers of the dissertation,and ignore the substantial academic content innovation。Results,The paper published by some academic journals will inevitably show the same scene,It is difficult to see the content that really has academic value。Therefore,We should prevent and refuse to have a beautiful form of clothes,Even though it seems to be able to "cover people's ears",But it cannot cover up the pale of the content。

Last,Evaluation indicators。Evaluation of the achievements of philosophy and social sciences,It is undeniable that the evaluation indicator needs to be required。Past,The way to evaluate the achievements of philosophy and social sciences with Bet365 lotto review a single indicator system is gradually questioned and abandoned。Now,We must deeply understand the complexity of philosophy and social science research and evaluation,Accurately grasp the different characteristics of the evaluation object,Adhere to the coordination of peer evaluation and social evaluation、Combination of qualitative evaluation and quantitative evaluation、Connect of process evaluation and results evaluation、Supplement of the current evaluation and long -term evaluation,Constantly enhance the scientific and credibility of the evaluation results。It can be said,Regardless of evaluation items、Specialty、Thesis and other results,Still evaluating the journal、Select talents、Awards、Title evaluation, etc.,All should adhere to this principle。This can make unique features、Choose the highlights of advantages and contributions,Constantly improve science and reasonable、Integrity and Justice Evaluation System。

Pay attention to the evaluation of philosophy and social sciences,Strengthen the improvement of philosophy and social science evaluation,It is conducive to researchers bet365 Play online games to be honest、Perseverance to do true learning,Complete the innovation of "from 0 to 1",Become a real scholar; help better respect for talents、Respect creation、Respect creation,Provide opportunities and resources for outstanding philosophy and social science research talents,Create a good academic environment; publishing and publishing for the achievement of real valuable results,and the emergence of academic thought、Communication、Sharing and innovation; help changes "in academic propositions、Academic Thought、Academic Perspective、Academic Standards、The ability and level of academic discourse are not commensurate with my country's comprehensive national strength and international status. ",Realize the prosperity and development of my country's philosophy and social sciences。

  bet365 best casino games

Editor in charge: Zhang Jing
QR code icons 2.jpg
Key recommendation
The latest article
Graphics
bet365 live casino games
Video

Friendship link: Official website of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences |

Website filing number: Jinggong.com Anmi 11010502030146 Ministry of Industry and Information Technology:

All rights reserved by China Social Sciences Magazine shall not be reprinted and used without permission

General Editor Email: zzszbj@126.com This website contact information: 010-85886809 Address: Building 11-12, Building 1, Building, No. 15, Guanghua Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing: 100026