Scientific evaluation or evaluation is a social activity that will inevitably occur at a certain stage of the awareness of things，It is an indispensable important link in the process of high -quality development。So，Process of the Junction of the Academic Journal、Journal ability、Effects of Journal、Journal contribution and other aspects to carry out scientific evaluation，It is a necessary way for the high -quality development of academic journals。From the 1980s，Lanzhou University、China Institute of Science and Technology Information、Chinese Academy of Sciences、Peking University、Nanjing University、Chinese Academy of Social Sciences、Wuhan University、China Zhiwang and other third -party evaluation subjects have carried out a series of academic journal evaluation work。These tasks are from different angles、Different levels enriched the evaluation and practice of academic journals in my country，To a certain extent, it bet365 best casino games has promoted the rapid development of my country's academic journal cause。

May 2021，Propaganda Department of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China、Ministry of Education、The "Opinions on Promoting the Prosperity and Development of Academic Journal" jointly issued by the Ministry of Science and Technology clearly propose "Improve the Related Evaluation System of Academic Journals"，And improve and improve the academic journal evaluation system、Scientific guidance and application of the application of academic journal evaluation results made specific requirements。At the same time，With the widespread application of various emerging technologies and the continuous improvement of service awareness of journal service，The positioning of academic journals is no longer a paper publication in the traditional sense，More like a diversified publishing and service platform with professional content and authoritative scientists。From this，The evaluation of academic journals in the future，Maybe to go to the comprehensive evaluation of "Academic -Industry -Popular Service Platform" centered on academic journal publishing Bet365 app download services。Evaluation practice of academic journals in the new era requires both adherence to the original scientific evaluation principles，It also needs to face new opportunities and new challenges to continuously improve and innovate。

First，Persist in division、Evaluation in the field。Different disciplines、Contents and services in different fields to academic circles、The role and contribution of the industry and the public will all show certain differences。So，Evaluation of academic journals should adhere to the division、Evaluation in the field，Establish different evaluation models according to different disciplines，Set different evaluation indicators and weight systems。

2，Accelerate the comprehensive evaluation of the main content of publishing content and service capabilities。Academic journals are both academic publishing platforms，It is also an academic service platform，Evaluation of academic journals should also be expanded around the key elements of the platform and its extension service during the publishing process。So，Evaluation of academic journals should adhere to the quality evaluation of publishing content，influence of the journal platform、Services bet365 live casino games and contribution evaluations are value -added evaluations，Integration and development of realizing basic evaluation and value -added evaluation。

third，Expansion of academic journal evaluation with multiple evaluations and open evaluations。In order to comprehensively reflect the academic journal to the economy、Politics、Cultural and other fields of value and contribution，Should work hard from multiple perspectives、Multi -indicator system、Modern quality evaluation of the whole life cycle in the multi -source data、Evaluation and contribution evaluation。Open data in the world、Open Science、Under the guidance of open service sharing policy，Future academic journals will become an important force for open academic services。So，Strive to explore the evaluation of academic journals under the open environment，is one of the important contents of the evaluation of academic journals in prosperity。

Fourth，Continue to enhance the participation and credibility of peer evaluation in academic journal evaluation。Publication of academic journals is professional、Academicity、Innovative features，It is difficult to comprehensively through bet365 live casino games quantitative indicators、True、Accurately evaluate its quality and service level。So，It is significant to scientifically introduce expert peer reviews in the evaluation of academic journals。Current，The participation and credibility of enhanced expert peer evaluation needs to focus on three aspects。1 is to improve the criteria for peer review、Process and supervision and reward and punishment system; the second is to establish a peer evaluation expert certification、Review process record、Review number determination、Standards for evaluation quality assessment; the third is to rely on big data、Artificial intelligence and blockchain technology，Build a quantitative and quality expert peer review work service platform。With higher peer review participation and trust，Organic combination of promoting academic journal evaluation work to achieve quantitative evaluation and qualitative evaluation。

Fifth，Promote the theory of evaluation of academic journals、The scientific understanding of the method and the reasonable application conversion of the evaluation results。Over the years，Evaluation of academic journals for academic Bet365 app download community、Method、Standard、Scope of use、Limitation, etc. still insufficient control，Error cognition of some evaluation indicators and evaluation results、Misuse、Mixed use、Excessive use, etc. also occur from time to time。Each evaluation subject should be based on the development requirements of academic journals in the new era，Actively formulate a more fair and transparent evaluation work plan，And evaluating theory、Evaluation method、Evaluation Tool、Evaluation process、The cognition and use of the evaluation results，Make the academic community aware of the evaluation of the journal、Understanding accurate、Use reasonable、Happy feedback，Continuously promoting the high -quality development of Chinese academic journal evaluations。

　Bet365 app download