Summary is usually called academic review、Literature review，refers to the author is on a question、works in a research field、Thesis、Research Report and other research results on research results，more comprehensive introduction and evaluation of specific disciplines、Status at home and abroad for specific problems、Main views、Research advantages and disadvantages，Predictive prediction of the trend of related research，Then make opinions or suggestions。Summary is one of the more common academic expression forms in the field of humanities and social sciences。Academic research requires a review，Because it is usually，Research must be founded on the basis of previous research，The previous research results are new academic research、The premise and cornerstone of building a new academic knowledge system。The writing method of the literature review，Including the best evidence comprehensive method、Critical review、yuan analysis, etc.。

　　bet365 best casino games

Common reviews in academic research are: topic application for topics (usually required to write the status quo at home and abroad)，Doctoral dissertation、Summary of Master's Degree Thesis (Summary of both research results)，Summary in the study of academic monographs (usually the preliminary related research on monograph related themes is usually comprehensively sorted and summarized)，Academic journal paper review，Summary of Academic Symposium，etc.。From the perspective of expression，"Review" in academic research，mainly presents the following five types。

One，Thesis or work indicates that your research belongs to a review sex research，The results published in the name of "Summary" (such as "New Mission of Administrative Law in the New Era -Research on the 2018 Annual Meeting of the Chinese Law Society's Administrative Law Research Association", "Civil Law Research Transformation and Leap in Civil Law compilation — —The description of the theoretical research results of civil law in 2019 ")。

Its two，Foreword of the thesis study、Introduction、The issue of the question bet365 Play online games part of the literature review。The main purpose of this review is to review existing research perspectives，Then ask your own research questions，or on this basis to lead some views or opinions on your own，Research the legitimacy of your own research topic。

Its three，The title of the article does not use similar expression words such as "review"，It does not belong to the aforementioned specialized review research or the preface of the article is a review of the problem for the problem.，Many parts of the articles or articles "mainly use the review method of review" or the review ideas。

Four，Although the article has certain originality，Improving knowledge increase，But in the specific part of the text，But a lot、Illegal use of other people's research data、Views、Analysis of ideas、Research conclusion，Lack of your own text mining、Practice survey、Case analysis。The research conclusions or views described in the paper rely on the research conclusions of others to get support。

Five，Although the article is presented in the form of the paper，But in fact, the author uses "review" writing mode，Research routine used、Thinking、The method is "review"，Then the paper is essentially "reviewing thesis"。

First、"Summary" in two situations，Usually considered reasonable。The latter three situations cannot be regarded as strict and standardized academic review research。In practice，The phenomenon of unreasonable use of the review exists in different disciplines，This problem in the papers in the law of law is also more prominent。

　The value of the review of the review

Strict、specification、System、Reasonable review research is often the first step in academic research。The value of excellent review research lies in the following aspects。

First，helps researchers or readers track academic research dynamics，Display cutting -edge results and academic perspectives。A review can help readers understand the research ideas of scholars on specific problems、Basic views and positions。Readers can use the learning and analysis of the review，Determine whether the specific conclusion is scientific、Reasonable，Even a new research question is even based on the review of the review，Form new research ideas。Summary also helps readers to save time for viewing literature，Grasp the correct direction of academic research。

Second，Summary is both bet365 live casino games an integral part of academic research，It is also the prerequisite and foundation for further development of academic research。Summary is "Important Information for Updating Knowledge"。The author can scattered the relevant academic topics by writing a review、The knowledge of the fragment has risen to a relatively comprehensive、System knowledge。Readers can get rich knowledge in a limited time by reading review。Since the review is a new progress in a specific academic field、New achievements、Analysis and description of new trends，Therefore, a good summary is that people grasp the academic cutting -edge dynamics、Important academic products that have enlightened ideas。As a concentration and summary of existing research literature，Summary "Dressing an important responsibility for the direction of the reader"。For young scholars、Students let's talk，Good academic review can also play a role in improving its academic level。Excellent academic summary helps to make up for the poor scientific information，Open people's vision。

Last，Summary helps scholars to improve their research ability。Through summary academic perspective、Description Social Development Law、Reasonable prediction of the development trend of specific problems，Scholars can improve their induction、Analysis、Summary and other abilities。The review is the author's criticism of the previous research，Then express reasonable and well -evident insights，Show the reader's important way to demonstrate the logic of their own argument。With existing literature，The author can "demonstrate、Explanation and interpretation of the problem of the problem、Suggestions and ideas，Eliminate readers' questions。

　　How to use the review reasonably

Good reviews, of course, have strong academic value，Help people overview dynamics、Get wisdom enlightenment，but unreasonable、Occuasable reviews will affect academic innovation，Reduce the value of academic research。Academic journals If you often publish an excessive use of comprehensive research methods or the academic achievements of writing routines，will weaken the academic level and credibility of the journal。Look at it in the long run，This will also corrupt academic atmosphere，Construction of the knowledge specification Bet365 app download system，It is not conducive to promoting academic innovation。So，How should I use a review reasonably in academic research?

First，Reasonable Note，Reduction is not necessary、Not authoritative betting。Unreasonable reviews often accompanied by unreasonable quotation。According to specifications，In the writing of Law academic papers，Any "involved academic perspective、Legal documents、Case、Statistics data, etc.，It needs to explain the source without being stated in the text，It should be indicated "(see the" Law Quoting Manual ")。But "Citation" is usually "necessary"。In practice，Some papers are only about 20,000 words，But the length of the citation accounts for a large proportion (up to 30%-50%)。The author does not show new research ideas、Research method，If the content of the citation is removed，This paper will shrink significantly，This attraction and review obviously is obviously unreasonable。From the perspective of quotation，If a paper does not need to attract too much，It is easy to be judged as an unreasonable summary research。From the perspective of the quality of the coding，If a paper quotes a large number of non -authoritarian literature，It is likely to be incomplete、Inaccurate、Summary research with low quality。

2，Reasonably quote the academic perspective of others，Reduce the situation of reference to many people's perspectives to support their academic perspectives。If a paper is mainly pile of the conclusions of the existing literature research，Rare or almost without your own point of view，Usually an unreasonable review thesis。In other words，If a papers frequently quote the conclusions or opinions of others，It may belong to the reality of "review" in the name of "quotation"。Now，Some academic papers seem to adopt the method of writing，In fact, the review of "quoting the views of others"。Of course，Regardless of information quotation、Case quotation or data quotation，As long as it is necessary for supporting specific views，or the theoretical analysis necessary，still belongs to a reasonable quotation。

third，Calculating the review as the basis for excavating new research themes。Usually，An article is only comprehensive based on the results of the previous research.、Accurate grasp，Only to avoid duplication of academic bet365 live casino games research。Summary helps the author to understand the academic perspective of existing research、Research method、Achievements and advantages，It also helps to discover the blank blank of research、defects or deficiencies，So as to lay the foundation for the current research。On the one hand，Summary research helps to prevent completely similar academic topics。But on the other hand，The author's review made by the results of the predecessors in order to find the new topic，Is it necessary to place them all in your own academic papers? The answer is obviously negative。Even if the review is necessary、Important，It has the basic significance for excavating a new research theme，Researchers do not need to use a lot of space to comprehensively、Display the content of the review of the review。

The more reasonable approach is，Academic papers should use the most concise language，Show the existing research perspectives and their deficiencies，Then lead to the topic of your own research。On the other hand,，Investigation from the perspective of the question of academic papers，If the "topic" and "problem" of a thesis study is similar to existing research results，Victory of others in a large amount、Information，It is more likely to be judged as an unreasonable "review" research。Another situation is，Although the researchers excavated the new topic of research，But the review part of the study part is lengthy、Drag，Occupy the length，The review is not reasonable enough。Of course，A brand new topic often has a large research space，There are less research results、You can refer to the results directly，Therefore, even if there is a certain academic review，It will not affect the knowledge innovation of the paper。

Fourth，Use poly source、Multi -type quotation literature。Writing of law papers often involves multi -disciplines、References for multiple types of humanities and social sciences，Ru academic monograph、Academic Papers、Legislative text、Judicial Case、Comparison of French documents and resources、Empirical survey、Legal policy analysis, etc.。In practice，There are a large number of seemingly compliance with quotation specifications，But the dissertation of a single type of literature (mainly based on simplicity bet365 live casino games of journal category quotation literature)。If in the review，We once encountered two manuscripts that were continuously voted by the author，The content is the practical research theme in the field of litigation law。Theoretically，In addition to quoting academic works and journal views, such papers should be quoted，It should also be concentrated in interpretation of legislative texts、A large number of analysis of practical cases and their legal disputes，Even in -depth comparative legal research, etc.。But very regrettable is，Among the author's two papers，The number of citations of Chinese journal papers in Law accounted for 90%，Other quotes account for only 10%，And all Chinese works。If you simply point out from the perspective of academic norms，Its papers are fully in line with the basic principles of "all citations must be noted"，But it violates another principle -the "necessity principle of quotation"。

This kind of articles often lack the basic monographs related to research、In -depth interpretation of authoritative literature，Lack of legislative text、In -depth mining and analysis of judicial cases。Due to the single source of reading literature、Type single，It is difficult to produce insightful opinions。In a sense，The more types of reading literature、The more source，The easier it is to improve the innovation of research results。For this，Research should prevent simple replication、Large use of foreign language information translated by others; prevent the conclusions of other people from the conclusions of case analysis to replace the author's own review of the case; eliminate a large number of investigations and research data of others in the text;。A good law papers must not only quote the perspective and data of supporting the conclusions of your own research.，It is also necessary，and respond and discuss this，This can improve the innovative nature of academic research。

Fifth，To adopt the proper review method。Improved review method，Will reduce the innovative nature of thesis。If a paper is a review，The following situations should be prevented in the writing method: First, simply stacking existing literature，instead of refining the main views of existing research; the second is to quote one by one，But I don’t bet365 best casino games discuss the content of the reference、Reflection or questioning，Lack of information extraction and problem analysis related content; third, a large use of the review method to support the main point of view，Lack of substantial、Original content that can support your point of view。

In short，The important paradigm of social science research is: describe social phenomena、Reveal and analyze the cause of the problem，Then give the school interpretation and response plan。The review is to present the overall state of existing research，Discover the lack of previous research or omissions，Research the necessity or research ideas of a specific research，Not to popularize research knowledge in a subject or field，Can't review for review。Learn this，The content of the review should be simply displayed with the basic points of existing results、Pure more concepts of originality are appropriate。

　　(Author Unit: School of Law of the University of Political Science and Law)