Dai Zhen Thought Study in Zhang Taiyan in the early 20th century、Liang Qichao、Hu Shi and others send it up，Later, became one of the manifestations of the study of academic thought in the Qing Dynasty。Since the middle of the Qing Dynasty, Jiang Fan、Fang Dongshu Two after opening the academic paradigm of "the battle of the Han and Song dynasties"，The ideological research on Dai Zhen also continues the ideological mode of "the battle of Han and Song" to a certain extent，Just the ideological content and form of the two parties changed。On the occasion of the late Qing Dynasty，Zhang Taiyan excavated the positive content in Dai Zhen's thought from the perspective of sympathy，great commendation of the people's content of Dai Zhen's philosophy。Liang Qichao、Hu Shi emphasized the ideological content of Dai Zhen's "counter -rational"，Liang's must have created a "emotional philosophy shift" for the criticism of the humanity in Song and Ming Confucianism.，Hu's thought that Dai Zhen's philosophy got rid of the content of the semi -religious and semi -Xuanxue in Song and Ming Dynasty and contained the scientific spirit。Wang Guowei ’s research on Dai Zhen's thoughts shows certain complexity，Early, the "reason" theory in Dai Zhen's philosophy，and identify the 300 -year philosophical work of the Qing Dynasty，Dai Zhen's "Original Good" and "Mencius meaning" is the most valuable。But later on the issue of Dai Zhen's "Water Sutra" research，The "qi" showing Dai Zhen's "qi" is not taken for granted，and thereby reducing the evaluation of its ideological achievements。Qian Mu uses the usual thinking of historians，Carefully examined the source of Dai Zhen's academic thought，For Dai Zhenzhi's academic academic、Inheritance of thought，Give extremely delicate examination，Based on Zhu Zixue's extensive bet365 Play online games "grid" idea of ​​"in the world" as the standard，The narrow "grid" spirit of Dai Zhen is only "grid" in the "Get Six Classics" is extremely dissatisfied，I believe that Dai Zhen "still is still the spirit of a Sinologator also"。

After the 1940s，Chinese Marxist Mr. Hou Waulu's ideological research on Dai Zhen，mainly to abandon the research results of Hu Shi and Qian Mu，Try to give a more important evaluation。But Mr. Hou himself takes the philosophy of Wang Fu as the standard，The characteristics of Dai Zhen's thoughts failed to give sympathy for understanding，Overall the evaluation of the achievements of Dai Zhen's thoughts is too low。After the 1950s，The mainstream paradigm of Dai Zhen's ideological research is in the material and thought、Dialectics and metaphysics are expanded in the form of discounted words，Affirmation of the materialism of "qi theory" thought in its philosophy，Criticism of the metaphysical thoughts shown in its epistemology，And the people's nature and early enlightenment thoughts contained in the proposition of "killing people" propositions in their social thoughts were given great commendations。After the 1990s，A few scholars try to introduce modern Western language and thought，Chinese -style language thoughts and methods created by Dai Zhen and the Qianjia scholars they represent，I made a deeper study，Created the new face of Dai Zhen's philosophy research。A few scholars also tried to introduce the vision of philosophical interpretation，The characteristics of Dai Zhen's philosophical interpretation of Dai Zhen's path of linguistics，Preliminary exploration。But this research path is still in the test，It has not been widely accepted in the academic community。

To say，With the extensive contact between Chinese society and Western society，Western academic thoughts have been introduced into the Chinese academic community，The research on Dai Zhen's thought has also expanded a broader academic space，Basically, the academic paradigm effect of the Bet365 lotto review "Han and Song disputes" formed in the late Qing Dynasty jumped out of the Qing Dynasty。Facing the rich academic heritage formed since the 20th century，How to develop my new academic direction in contemporary Dai Zhen thought，and can we truly grasp the achievements of Dai Zhen's thoughts more? Due to the limitations of its era，What is the misunderstanding in Dai Zhen's thoughts? You need to make new explorations for these。

　　bet365 best casino games

From the perspective of philosophical interpretation，All ideological studies have their own or unknown or dark academic "previous see"。The academic "previous view" of the researcher will cover some vision on the one hand，On the other hand, it will also show the profoundness and rationality of some kind of "previous" view。But how to avoid using a certain philosophy as a criterion for judging to tailor the height of Dai Zhen's thoughts、Integrated、Achievement，The academic method misunderstandings we should avoid in the study of contemporary Dai Zhen thought。Some research scholars who have the theoretical sympathy and identity of Cheng Zhuxue for Cheng Zhuxue，Often criticized Dai Zhen's philosophical formal achievement from the perspective of the abstract school of Cheng Zhu Li,，For Dai Zhen's bad social effects of the criticism of Cheng Zhu Li, "killing by rationality" is not taken for granted，Then criticized Dai Zhen's philosophy that really created the possibility of "killing with courtesy"。This is not only for the position of the nursing education，And there is also a deep meaning of Zhou Na。

For the past 30 years，Domestic Confucian research presents a comprehensive and expanded process of Zhu Lixue、Yangming Heart Studies，The trend of the two high deepening and refining the two，Research on Dai Zhen's thoughts is in a relatively deserted state。Overview A small number of related works and papers published in the past ten years，There is a gratifying side，There is also a worrying side。It is a pleasure to look at it，For Dai Zhen's language thought、Research on Explanation of the Thoughts of Academic bet365 live casino games Thoughts，Like Li Changran's "Dai Zhen's" Original Shan ", the book (2014) is more in -depth、Detailed revealing the changes before and after Dai Zhen's philosophical text centered on "original good"，and borrowed the theory of Sachel's linguistic theory, made very new inquiry on Dai Zhen's language philosophy and interpretation of the ideas，Among them, Shengyi Lou，There is a sense of ears of newcomers。Xu Daobin's "Dai Zhen's Research Research" (2007)，It examines Dai Zhen's text in more comprehensive and detailedly、sound rhyme、Training、collation、Collection、Differential learning，Although I do not study Dai Zhen's thoughts,，But through a comprehensive study of Dai Zhen's academic thought，Help people better understand Dai Zhen’s thought from the perspective of methodology。

The worrying issues are mainly manifested in the following four aspects。One is that the problem of problem is relatively old，Old tone heavy bomb。The main reason is that some scholars studying Dai Zhen's thoughts，Lack of basic understanding of new progress on Dai Zhen's research in recent decades，The research results of the former sages I followed are often Liang Qichao、Qian Mu and others related discussions，Even the research results of Hu Shi at the same time did not study carefully。Research results in the domestic and overseas academic circles in recent decades，Not in the field of vision of some new papers。The second is that I know less about Dai Zhen's philosophical literature，Often limited to a few most famous works (such as "Mencius", "Yuanshan", etc.，and a large amount of materials about philosophical research methods in their letters basically do not know much about。Its three，I often understand the "common" understanding of Dai Zhen's ideological literature，For the development of thought、Different expressions lack basic understanding。Four，A few scholars exist in the consciousness of "nursing education"，Because I prefer Cheng Zhu Lixue，Dai Zhen's philosophical method criticized Dai Zhen for maintaining Cheng Bet365 lotto review Zhuxue's position。Some people are out of preference for Qian Mu，The "derogatory" ideological tendency shown in Qian Mu's Dai Zhen thought research has almost no awareness，Often take Qian Mu's evaluation of Dai Zhen's thoughts and use it directly，and use it as your own research conclusion。This is not very suitable for the academic research requirements of modern human literature。

　　The new direction of Dai Zhen's thought research now

On the 300th anniversary of Dai Zhen's birthday，How to better carry out Dai Zhen research，It should be taken from the following four aspects。One，In -depth summary of Dai Zhen academic、The results of ideological research，In particular, you must effectively reflect on the gains and losses of various research paradigms (or academic way)，Such as "the dispute between the Han and Song dynasties", "Early Enlightenment", "Material Materials", "Dialectics and metaphysics" and other discussions。Only the academic evaluation of these discussions is more willing to compare，Absorb its reasonable ideological core，Abandon the deficiencies，can we truly consolidate the academic foundation of our further research。Its two，Based on the recently published "Dai Zhen Chronicles"，Main academic in "Dai Zhen's Book" more deeply and carefully、Time editing of ideological documents，It is best to edit "Dai Zhen's Academic Thoughts on the Chronicles"，Make the latecomers more accurately grasped Dai Zhen's changes in thought、Development trajectory。Its three，Deeper Dai Zhen's inner concept system，and the formation time of its main philosophical concept、Change of expressions、Academic origins, etc.，Then more truly grasp the structure of its thoughts。Current，The face portrayal of Dai Zhen's philosophy in the academic world has not obtained consensus。Whether the thought is new meaning、New Taoist Theory is still theory，There is no accurate answer。How to accurately portray the overall appearance of Dai Zhen's philosophy，It is an extremely important bet365 live casino games problem for Dai Zhen's current ideological research。Four，It should be in a broader comparative philosophical vision，Examine Dai Zhen's thoughts as European philosophers in the same time、East Asian philosophers of East Asian philosophers，and the ideological issues that are concerned about the discussion of the issues of human society may have the enlightenment meaning。

other，Knowing the limitations of Dai Zhen's thoughts，and very controversial issues encountered in the study of Dai Zhen's academic thought in the past century，You also need to provide new historical materials，Further clarification，or give a more flat explanation。Some people like to criticize Dai Zhen from the perspective of morality and personality，But rarely pay attention to and reveal that he echoed Kangxi's "Western Studies" theory of "Western Source" on the issue of "Western Studies"，and the negative impact on the research of the history of natural sciences throughout the Qing Dynasty。On this question，As a four -library minister，He was given by the Emperor Qianlong as the same as the jinshi，To maintain political correctness，Dai Zhen accepted and carefully demonstrated the view of "Western Source"，Qian Daxin, the same time as him。On this question，Dai Zhen's ideological limitations，Both his personal，It is also the commonality of traditional academics。But Dai Zhen in his biggest philosophical book "Mengzi Win Syndrome"，But show great ideological independence and critical consciousness，and positively criticized the official support of Cheng Zhuxue in the theory of ethics containing the theoretical tendency of "killing people"，I proposed "love with love", "but all of them can be placed"、New political ideals and social ideals that enable the world to "reaches love" and Wang Daojiu。A era of lack of ideological light in Qianjiakao，Dai Zhen reflects the integrity of the traditional Confucian scholar and the noble feelings for the people。

Dai Zhen was a Confucian reader in the Yonggan bet365 live casino games period，Its personality contains the "madman" spirit and the "狷 狷" attitude。He is not a sage，but just a relatively upright Confucian scholar，Therefore, some things that are not satisfactory in their lives do not have to ask him to ask him morally。Historical figures as a special era，We mainly look at what new value and new content provided by his thoughts compared with his predecessors and contemporary people，without having to correspond to what we need today。This，We may be able to better evaluate his contribution of academic and ideological aspects。

　(The author is a professor at the School of Philosophy of Wuhan University)