After the Third Plenary Session of the Eighteenth Central Committee put forward social governance innovation，How to promote social work to participate in social organization construction and social governance，Then improve its status and role in social governance innovation，The focus of becoming a research on the social work community is increasingly becoming the focus of the social work academic research。Except for research on current professional education and practical experience，Research on the history of Chinese social work disciplines has also provided a lot of historical experience in reflecting on localization of social work。But the research method of the history of social work discipline has not been discussed by the system，And this research work is organized by organic connections between the history of the discipline and the practice of contemporary disciplines，It is important to expand the localization theoretical connotation of the discipline outside the current discipline system。

Look at the research method of the current history of social work in China，Nothing outside the study of discipline origin、Discipline professional historical positioning research two ideas。The former from the perspective of the generation of professional knowledge，On the one hand, the relationship between the development of Chinese social work and the introduction of western social work，On the other hand, from Bet365 lotto review the perspective of endogenous history，Review the relationship between this modern discipline and the social ideas and social movements in the late Qing Dynasty and the early Republic of China; the latter is based on the professional connotation of social work theory，Let's distinguish social work as the origin of the discipline of modern social sciences，Try to exclude the endogenous historical perspective doped in the previous study from the professional discipline paradigm。The logic of these two types of research debate，quite similar to the "history of philosophy" writing between Feng Youlan and Hu Shi in the 20th century，Although there is reasonable basis，Also loses its bias。The research history of disciplines is separated from the relationship between traditional Chinese social thought and social work as a modern knowledge system，Therefore, the inner logic of the former transformed into the latter failed;，Disciplinary Debate based on professional theoretical paradigms，Reject Chinese thoughts and social resources in modern disciplines again，From this, it is impossible to dig out a traditional Chinese society that helps to form a public ethics.，It is difficult to achieve the rooting of discipline theory。Big bias for two research ideas，It can be attributed to ignoring the attention of the "problem domain" generated by modern Chinese social sciences，Therefore, it is difficult to form a general research method of the origin and development of the discipline。

At the time of the early prosperity of history sociology in the first 20th century，Historical research on the issue of "Origin" caused a lot of discussion。The first bet365 live casino games -generation scholar of the "Yearbook School" Mark Bloch and others have criticized the two historical research tendencies on the "confusion of origin": one is to find historical defense for reality politics and ideology; second It's because of "judgment"，Research for research。Both are the deadly enemies of "true history"。In other words，If you cannot clear up the long and dynamic social structure evolution behind historical events，You cannot understand the inevitability of accidental history。Visible，The emergence of a certain subject in the history of knowledge development，As a superficial occasional history，Still need to return to the overall nature of the knowledge spectrum、Structural history defines its nature。In this sense，The history of knowledge is the consequences of the impact of ideological history and social history。This cannot replace the internal historical logic generated by disciplines for the establishment of an event signal，It is not possible to use the contemporary standards of professional knowledge paradigms to eliminate historical richness in the development of knowledge。To grasp the development of this knowledge production，History analysis perspective in the medium and long period of time is quite important，It helps to break through the barriers to break through the existing research methods of Chinese social work disciplines at the three levels。

First，The study history in the perspective of the overall historical field contains the vision of more historical analysis，It helps us understand the rise of Chinese social work in the "problem domain" in the transformation of modern society in China。bet365 best casino games Just as Kong Feili、Du Zanda and others expressed by the Institute of local autonomy issues in the late Qing Dynasty and the early Republic of China，Local social rise represented by the "Shen Dong" Group，Makes the governance of Chinese national governance in the predicament: on the one hand, it is reflected in the competition of local society and state forces，On the other hand, it is reflected in the state to maintain the stability of the system through administrative absorption of society。It can be said，This governance structure laid the foundation for the national politics of Chinese national politics throughout the 20th century。In this process，How to forge can adapt to citizen morality in modern China，It is of key significance for breaking the "collection" cycle of the governance logic。This means，Under the modern national governance system，Can't fully use the traditional history of scriptures to cope with the change of social conditions，The rise of modern social sciences including social work is an inevitable trend in response to the issue of social change under emerging conditions。How to understand this modern Chinese social transformation issue，How to echo the historical mission of public ethics and moral construction during the political system，All constitute the knowledge foundation of social work participating in social governance innovation。

Next，Disciplinary research in the perspective of overall historical field also means that the subject of social work discipline is regarded as a knowledge spectrum system.，instead of dismembered it with the current subject classification of the discipline，So as to provide an opportunity bet365 live casino games for localized innovation of Chinese social work。Although the establishment of the Department of Social Work of the Chinese Church University in the early 20th century, the power of Western social workers，But early Chinese scholars did not copy their knowledge，Instead, in response to the above historical propositions, explore the theory and practical mode that is suitable for Chinese and social conditions。For example，Social work of Yanjing University has abandoned the proposition of the US social workers at that time，Working work、Group work integrated into the community work system，Through the transformation of the traditional Chinese treaty thought，combined with regional theoretical research to drive community work development，Entering a unique social construction practice road。Especially the construction of a comprehensive regional economy advocated by the Qinghe Test、The idea of ​​coordinating the balance of urban and rural balance，For today's rural work and rural policies to stabilize rural economic development，Forging self -growing rural residents still have inspirational meaning。

Last，Research methods for the history of overall disciplines also need to clear the basis of the action of discipline practice at the "collective action" level，The development of social work discipline will be placed in the social movement of the 1920s and 1930s，Examine the relationship between different knowledge schools and practical actions，To understand the spiritual nature of this subject in the context of Chinese civilization。If you jump out of a professional perspective，Early social work discipline practice Bet365 lotto review only constitutes some genre in rural construction。Its response to the transformation of Chinese -made issues is the gradual establishment of the ideological argument between schools and practical cooperation，Therefore，Understand the similarities between these arguments and practical models，Not only the complexity of clarifying the theoretical form of localization of social work is extremely important，At the same time, it is also necessary for the unified cultural value behind capturing the miscellaneous knowledge forms。Intellectuals as the responsible person of this social movement，"Back to the folk" as the rescue of the corrosive world of people，It itself constitutes an important dimension that reflect on constructing modern Chinese public ethics。

As Wang Sibin pointed out，Research on History of Social Work in China is a grasp of the historical character of Chinese social work，In other words，It is also the writing of a model value of knowledge。from Gu Zhijin，does not mean that the knowledge bred in history can be directly transformed into instrumental utility，On the contrary，Only under the premise of both "Ancient" and "Today" and real contact，The model value of knowledge can constitute the significance of reflection on current experience。Therefore，Only the origin test of good ancient origin，Or interpretation of only the current utility，Not enough to present the spirit of a discipline spirit in the ups and downs of the current changes in the era of the era，This is the goal of the study of overall subject history。

　　bet365 best casino games