Modernization promotes the generation and development of social sciences。To develop a systematic research on Chinese -style modernization，Accelerate the construction of China's independent modern knowledge system，Revolution of a social scientific research paradigm。Computing Social Sciences since it was officially proposed in 2009，At theoretical accumulation、Methods iteration、The topic expansion and knowledge production have made great progress。Complicated data science and computing science analysis technology is widely used in the field of social sciences，and our theoretical framework and empirical discovery of the long -term accumulation of social sciences lack enough attention。This may restrict the future development of social sciences，Let "technology cool，The "exquisite mediocre" achievement of the theory is the mainstream of the field of research。

　　Bet365 lotto review

According to the definition of Joey Levilia，Computing Social Science First is an empirical science，Followed by social science，Finally, it is calculation science; although calculated in this discipline, the larger and larger proportion，But the true nature of its social science is beyond doubt。Calculation Social Science almost covers Bet365 lotto review sociology、Anthropology、Social Psychology、Political Science and Economics and other major social science categories，and exist in the form of "calculation+discipline", "calculation+multidisciplinary" and "calculation+other disciplines"。Pioneer as a paradigm revolution，Calculating Social Sciences attempts to break the discipline territory divided in the long evolution，bet365 live casino games Included research themes include Vientiane，Bring new opportunities for the development of the traditional knowledge production system。But，We must also see some new challenges facing social sciences in recent years。

First，Scientific contribution to knowledge innovation is not as great as imagined。Sociologist Abert made sharp criticism on the current social sciences，It is believed that the large amount of academic production growth is just on the surface，More works and papers do not mean that the speed of new ideas is faster than in the past。Scientificization makes many disciplines towards the narrow form of social engineering (Social Engineering)，A large number of "exquisite mediocre" social science works appeared，Failure to bring exciting knowledge discovery。Blessing of computing power and algorithm，Makes computing social science on the road to scientificism farther，The possibility of being criticized at the same time increases steadily。

2，The rise of the integrated threshold for interdisciplinary resources may accelerate the crystallization of academic space。Disciplinary cross -requirement to calculate the knowledge structure of social scientists from a single discipline to multiple disciplines，However, in fact, this structure optimization is more difficult than imagined。Investigation and research relied on traditional empirical science、On -site research、Experimental research and literature research are people -centered，and calculating the role of "machine" in social sciences is constantly strengthening。Researchers collecting and analyzing data independently rely on multidisciplinary collaboration，Make social capital、Cultural Capital、Power Capital and Popularity Capital for Social Science Research is stronger。From this，The "Matthew effect" Bet365 app download of the academic space is intensified，Crystalization is intensified。

third，Platform agency has become the "invisible hand" of data production。Weigner, etc., built a large system faced by computing social sciences，Society based on platforms and algorithms、Political and economic system composition。Record、What to record and how to record，To a large extent, dominated by various platforms。Many discovers calculated social sciences have to rely on the data of "production" and "processing" of the platform，Evilled in capital、The superposition of algorithms and ethics，How to open the black box produced by this data is extremely challenging。If the researchers have strong subjectivity in traditional empirical social sciences，So this subjectivity has a certain weakening in computing social sciences。

　　Social thinking helps to calculate social sciences

Social thinking refers to the systematic understanding of human society and social interaction，It is mainly rooted in the subject of sociology。Social thinking attempts to reconcile the individual "excessive socialization" and "social lack of socialization"，Simmented "I saw the trees without seeing the forest" and "I saw the cracks of the forest without seeing the trees"，Emphasize the integration of "structure -mechanism" and "process -event"，To break the differences between humanities and science。Social thinking，Basic discipline represented by sociology has accumulated a lot of theoretical viewpoints and empirical discovery，Can be able to output key "grammar" for calculating social sciences。

The application of big data in the field of social science is becoming more and more common，But lack of framework with the integration of social scientific data。Recent，Kish and Kuru according to individual behavior -social interaction、Digital — Non -digital dimension builds four quadrants。At the top left is the bet365 Play online games digital behavior of the individual，The lower left is digital interactive data，On the right is traditional data。Lubei and Xilinga propose "Triangle Framework" for how to integrate multiple types of data。From top to bottom in order: traditional survey design、Measurement and statistical inference，With the help of statistical principles such as large number of laws; model auxiliary survey design，In the process of design survey, based on the existing explanation model as the premise，Emphasize the theoretical care behind it;，Use the survey to provide a model setting form for big data analysis、Parameter settings and other key basis; modelization and data mining。The above framework pointed out the possible direction for us to better handle the relationship between traditional data and traces of traces。

Calculating the discussion of data quality control from social science theory is extremely lacking。Big data production links (extraction -conversion -loading) of the loop to multiple times，Mistakes (bias)，Finally brought in statistical analysis, it affects the interpretation and prediction of the research results。For this，How to evaluate traces of data production process becomes a problem that we must face。Social survey expert Grovs, etc., has proposed a framework of data quality control based on overall error，It is believed that the investigation bias mainly comes from two aspects: measurement and representative。Ama Ya and others are inspired by this，Recently proposed the TED Errrs Framework for Digital TRACES of Humans for trace data。This framework decomposes the sources of traces of data bias into theoretical construction、Platform selection、Platform available preference、Platform driver behavior、Platform coverage rate deviation、Data collection、Data Pre -processing、User Bet365 lotto review pre -processing, analysis inference and other links。where，Theoretical construction breaks through the boundary of science，The theoretical construction of high -quality theory requires social thinking。The TED framework will be substantially inspired by the potential impact of the "invisible hand" of the platform on the platform。

Calculating social science's emphasis on predictability is far stronger than the persistence of interpretation。Disputes within the academic community，Goffman, Wartz and others proposed that the new paradigm of calculating social sciences is an explanatory and predictive integration，Emphasis on the significance of comprehensive research on exploratory and verification。But，Ecological position effects of academic space，Data scientists and computing scientists' right to speak is significantly stronger than social scientists，Social thinking has become the "natural endowment" of most scientists，and use it as a predicted priority。But，Social thinking is not the same as the common sense of daily life，It is inseparable from long -term professional training and accumulation。Social thinking helps to break the barriers that are difficult to uniform in social sciences。To avoid calculating the "exquisite and mediocre" of social science，The theory accumulated by traditional social sciences is particularly important。

　How can basic discipline play an important role

Computing Social Science is the product of information technology developed to a specific stage，It is also a social science that has both theoretical care and practical care。Relatively traditional social science，The threshold for the method of calculating social sciences is higher、Challenge greater，The theoretical needs of basic disciplines are enhanced，Higher social thinking requirements for computing social scientists。Like Bet365 lotto review sociology、Anthropology、Political Science and other basic disciplines，At least three dimensions can play a role in advancing the computing social sciences。

First，The direction of providing basic propositions。As Watz thinks，Social Science has produced a lot of theory in the past 100 years，But the task of evaluating the inconsistencies and the constraints is extremely arduous。Calculating social sciences must not only solve practical problems，We must firmly grasp the basic propositions，Finding and digging some certainty knowledge in the uncertainty of human development。These key propositions must be from basic disciplines。

2，Avoid the limit of breakthrough science。Treatmentism is the main paradigm of scientific interpretation，It has been criticized for a long time in social science research。Although complex science provides us with another possibility，But the complexity is increasingly challenging in the digital society of "counting as a match"。Sociology and Political Science and other studies have many in -depth research on the social life of capital utilization，It may be included in the game structure and its evolution、Challenges such as differentiation and uncertainty provides theoretical revelation，To ensure the explanatory and predictability of the computing social science。

third，A audit of algorithm through the front -end intervention。Internal governance proposed in Lu Peng and others、external governance、The "Digital Platform Governance Field" framework composed of common governance，cannot be separated from the participation of computing social sciences。but，Basic disciplines are also participating through the source、Content governance、Empowering the community and other channels to promote the key force of algorithm audit。Basic Discipline'Bet365 app download s understanding of various action subjects during the production process of data，It may provide the theoretical starting point for calculating social science solving major practical problems。

(This article is the phased achievement of the "Calculation Social Science Research of Literature in Big Data View" in Zhejiang University Discipline Cross -pre -Research Project)

(Author Unit: School of Public Management of Zhejiang University)