bet365 live casino games
The judicial system is an important part of the political system,Judicial justice is an important guarantee for social justice。In order to achieve the goal of "let the people feel fairness and justice in each case" proposed by General Secretary Xi Jinping,In recent years,Chinese positive、stable、Promoting the reform of the judicial system and working mechanism pragmatic,Treating the fairness of judicial justice,Optimize the configuration of judicial power、Strengthen human rights protection、Improve judicial ability、Focus on the practice of justice for the people,Further improving the socialist judicial system with Chinese characteristics。In this background,Using multiple perspectives to explore the mechanism of contemporary Chinese judicial theory and dispute solution,It is conducive to expanding vision、Time New Knowledge,Promoting the development and prosperity of socialist law and judicial reform theory in the new era。
Practicalism philosophy in Chinese judicial reform
Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China,The deployment and measures of China's judicial system reform series,All originated from Chinese judicial practice,Facing Chinese judicial practice。In this sense,Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, the basic philosophy of judicial reform in my country,Judicial philosophy that can be called practicalism -this "takes practice as the bet365 best casino games starting point,and finally return to practice "judicial philosophy,is a kind of judicial philosophy of "being in action",It has three righteousness for judicial reform。
Comprehensively implement the judicial responsibility system
The report of the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China proposed for the first time: "Deepen the comprehensive supporting reform of the judicial system,Comprehensively implement the judicial responsibility system,Efforts to make the people feel fairness and justice in each judicial case。"",Comprehensively implementing the judicial responsibility system has become a major reform task for the 19th National Congress,This is the judicial system to implement Xi Jinping's thoughts on socialism with Chinese characteristics in the new era、Deepen the comprehensive supporting reform of the judicial system、Important measures to promote the modernization of judicial system and judicial capabilities。Comprehensive implementation of the judicial responsibility system has a basic position in the main framework of the reform of the judicial system、iconic significance and global influence,To ensure that the judicial organs exercise their powers independently and fairly,In order to coordinate the promotion of the overall layout of the "Five -State" and coordinate the promotion of the "Four Comprehensive" strategic layout, it provides strong judicial services and guarantees,It has profound significance。
Construction and flow of judicial reform words
Judicial Reform of the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China,Different important methods have appeared in different times。These important methods can be called the words of judicial reform。Use of bet365 Play online games these words,Not only used for induction、Description of the ideas and tasks of judicial reform,At the same time, it is also the display of the will of the power of judicial decision makers。This article is selected by the four cases in the court's judicial reform for explanation,Reveal the power and mechanism and relationship behind it。
Administrative Agreement Assists the Structure of Administrative Litigation
Administrative Agreement as a new form of public and private cooperation,It is both a sign of the integration of public and private law,It is also an inevitable product of the transformation of social governance model。From my country's "Administrative Procedure Law", the administrative agreement litigation is included in the scope of the case,Discussion on the lawsuit of administrative agreements from all walks of life continues to heat up,The "Regulations on Several Issues on Trial of the CPPCO Cases" (hereinafter referred to as "Administrative Agreement Judicial Interpretation") issued by the Supreme People's Court also received high attention。The development of administrative agreements and the changes in the litigation structure triggered by it,Not just widen the scope of the case of administrative lawsuits,Added a class of administrative litigation cases,It means a new change of the administrative litigation system。
The "energy" and "cannot" mediation of administrative disputes
Administrative litigation "Solving administrative disputes" is not so far from the court、A leader in the plaintiff and the argumentation of the lawsuit,It is better to say that it is a national governance strategy proposed by the national legislature。If administrative disputes bet365 best casino games can be solved through mediation,Look at the experience and logic of daily life,Most people are acceptable。Even from a professional perspective,It is also sure。"Practice proof,The mediation before the litigation is more important than the contradiction between reconciling the parties than the lawsuit than the lawsuit.,To a certain extent, it is closer to the fundamental purpose of the parties (especially the plaintiff of the administrative litigation),Also solve the problem more effectively、The perspective of solving opposite emotions provides a better way to deal with it,Contradictions of Slow -release officers and people,It is important to solve administrative disputes in substantiveness。"But we must also see,"Although the mediation mode has many advantages in terms of dispute case resolution,It is difficult to form a stable knowledge system,Therefore, it is often a case and localization "。So,We still need to deal with the relationship between administrative dispute mediation and administrative referee。
Balance of the protection of the right to complaint and control in administrative litigation
For a long time,"Difficult to prosecute" is a prominent problem in my country's administrative lawsuit。But in recent years,Administrative litigation "vulnerability" seems to be a new question in theory and practice。"Difficult to prosecute" and "abuse" coexist,Reflecting the imbalance between the administrative litigation system between judicial supply and the needs of the parties。U of the face of unbalance between the supply and demand of rights and demand for rights,It is necessary to continue to expand the supply of Bet365 lotto review judicial relief,Rawnal cognition and reflection on the definition and response to "abuse",Litigation needs to meet the principles of the rule of law and the principle of rights of rights,The system and technology of "approaching justice" should be improved,At the same time, inhibit the act that truly constituted the right to abuse litigation。
The legal and concepts of civil compulsory enforcement of legislation
The start of the civil lawsuit on the prosecution,End in execution,Therefore, the enforcement of civil compulsory execution is the last level to realize judicial justice。For more than 70 years of the founding of New China,Executive development development is different,The construction of the execution rules slowly move forward,The reform of the implementation system is continuously advanced,while civil force enforcement of legislation, but the law is made, such as。For this,September 2018,The Civil Force Enforcement Law is listed as a second -class legislative project with the legislative planning of the Standing Committee of the 13th National People's Congress and clarified that the Supreme People's Court was drafted as a sign,China Civil Compulsory Execution has opened a new era。Civil compulsory enforcement legislation is the institutional foundation and inevitable requirements of advancing the modernization of the national implementation governance system and the modernization of governance capabilities,and legislative needs to be based on the standard of norms、Guided by advanced concepts,to improve legislative quality and efficiency,Finally realized the good method of protecting good treatment。
The development and innovation of the quality evaluation system of the people's court case
Case Quality Review as a routine and important function of the people's court's trial management,Facts of the facts of specific cases from the micro level、Evaluation of specific issues in the application of law and the use of procedures。The results of the evaluation are usually included in the judge's annual trial performance assessment,As a judicial performance evaluation、Judge level promotion、The main indicators of judicial ability evaluation。From this,The quality evaluation of the case has become an evaluation mechanism that reflects the ability of judges。
Perfect the civil litigation supporting system for the reform of the judge responsibility system
The Fourth Plenary Session of the Eighteenth Central Committee of the Party in October 2014, the "Decision of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on several major issues of comprehensively promoting the rule of law in accordance with the law" (hereinafter referred to as the "Decision") is of great significance to the reform of my country's judicial responsibility system。The banner of "Decision" clearly requires "Clarifying all levels within the judicial organs,Improve the internal supervision restriction mechanism。Internal personnel of the judicial organs shall not violate the regulations to interfere with the cases that other people are handling,Establishing a record system and responsibility system for the case of the internal personnel of the judiciary。Improve the judge of the trial、Documentary Court、Director prosecutor、Hosted the responsibility system for the investigator to Bet365 app download handle the case,Who is responsible for implementing the case ",This marks the new starting point and new journey of my country's judicial responsibility system reform。
Friendship link: The official website of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences |
Website filing number: Jinggong.com Anmi 11010502030146 Ministry of Industry and Information Technology: Beijing ICP No. 11013869
All rights reserved by China Social Sciences Magazine shall not be reprinted and used without permission
General Editor Email: zzszbj@126.com This website contact information: 010-85886809 Address: 11-12, Building 1, Building 1, No. 15, Guanghua Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing: 100026
>