bet365 live casino games According to a latest report，Global，Academy review work of academic journals is still mainly borne by experienced European and American scholars。

August 27，The official website of the British Institute of Physics has released Kim Eggleton, head of the scientific research integrity and tolerance department of the agency, and Laura Feetham, director of the participating department of the college review Bet365 lotto review department, "Motivation Report of Together Evaluation in 2020"。The report launched a questionnaire survey of more than 1,200 researchers，I look forward to understanding the status quo of peer reviews in the global academic community，Improve the efficiency and quality of the peer review process。These researchers from January 2018 to March 2020，Journal published by the British Physical Society Press as a peers，or I have received a peer review invitation from the agency。

The results of the survey show，Germany、United States、British scholars feel "invited overload"，More than 40%of these people indicate too many peer review invitations received; bet365 live casino games instead，Chinese and Hindu scholars have stated that the percentage of the invitation to receive too much review comments is less than 12%and 10%。As far as the motivation to undertake peer evaluation work，Scientific researchers first consider whether they are interested in comments，Followed to pay attention to the reputation and academic participation wishes of the journal。The most valuable recognition that scientific researchers want to receive are feedback from the author's author。59%of the respondents said，Cash or physical welfare for the motivation to accept invitations is very small。

Antonia Seymour, chief editor of the British Institute of Physics Press, Bet365 app download believes，In recent years，The number of papers to be reviewed continued to increase，But the number of members of the same members of the leders does not keep up with。This global trend has led to experienced Western scientific researchers for review and burden.，The geographical distribution of the invitations of peer reviews is even more uneven。David Evans (David Evans), the British Physical Society Press, also said，The rigor of the journal papers relies on the process of peer evaluation to ensure，The demand for high -quality peer evaluations for the academic community continues to grow，But the methods and processes that meet this demand have not developed at Bet365 app download the same speed。Academic publishing personnel must explore the publication working method that is consistent with the need to be consistent with it through practice，and speed up solving problems facing the college review work。

　　（Wang Youran/Compilation