For a long time，The methods and methods of defining and measuring research quality and influence are deeply affected by the global northern countries。The inequality and incompleteness of this research and evaluation model have increasingly attracted people's attention。August 5，International Science and Technology Publishing Director Jon Harle, Director of the INASP project, posted on the official website of the London School of Political Economics，Call for knowledge and production、Different background，Fundamental change of the understanding and evaluation of research value，to increase the importance of the value of research value in southern countries around the world，Create a more fair global knowledge ecosystem。

　　bet365 Play online games

Now，The evaluation method focused on the number of publications and indicators still occupy the main position within the research system，People can intuitively Bet365 lotto review evaluate the reference rate of the book、Tracking the reading of journal papers，Link the "Research results publication" to "whether the research results are excellent"。Hal said，This mode emphasizes the results published in the journal publishing in northern countries，It hinders the overall value of knowledge and a comprehensive assessment of researchers。The distortion of this evaluation standard is further intensified as the journal indicators are included in the global university ranking，This type of ranking systematically excludes the research institutions of southern countries。Therefore, it can be said，The criteria of this research and evaluation lack the consideration of different knowledge needs and knowledge production and use environment of the world。

Scholars in southern countries hope that their research results can be closely related to society，On the other hand, I hope to get the recognition of international peers。The former needs to invest time with community or policy decision makers、The practitioner cooperates; the latter needs to publish the paper on the "top journal"，Do some studies related to the topic interested in the global scientific bet365 live casino games community。They are forced to make a choice between the two，or very difficult to take care of the two at the same time。The disadvantaged group in the research system feels deeper about this，For example, researchers in their careers，Female researchers who need to take care of their career development and family responsibility，Located in remote areas、Researchers with less contact with international academic circles，Researchers who lack research funds, etc.。

In order to reform the existing research and evaluation mode，People also try to evaluate the wide social contribution of universities，For example, the British "Times Higher Education Supplement" released the "influence ranking" in the global university in 2021。In this ranking，Still in the front is still Europe、University in North America and Australia。Hal thinks，This is mainly determined by these universities' existing privileges and wealth, as well as the language advantages of English。In his opinion，People can choose to ignore various rankings，But it is undeniable that it is，Ranking has a huge impact on the research system and research culture，Including the setting Bet365 lotto review of the topic、Data collection and analysis method、The participation of the local community and the way of knowledge dissemination and sharing。Evaluation system will further affect the choice of investment in universities。For example，Universities will choose to invest in those who are most likely to publish papers in the "top journal" or get a good ranking in the ranking，instead of being a faculty and employee、The most useful project of students and communities。

　　Re -examine the value of the study of southern countries

What is worthy of joy is，Some beneficial changes are happening。"San Francisco Research Evaluation Declaration" and other initiatives and other initiatives，promoted the rethinking research and evaluation method of the global scientific system。The "Research Quality+" framework of the Canadian International Development Research Center has also been indicated，The correlation with local research needs、In the research and evaluation system of the local community connection and scientific rigor,，Research results of researchers in southern countries are better than scholars in northern countries。Inasp created the "journal Bet365 app download publishing practice and standard" framework。This framework follows the needs of southern countries，It has been adopted by the university fund committee of Nepal，Used for promotion evaluation, etc.。The regional funding system "Amelica" in Latin America is developing its own index services and "responsible indicators"，Scientific research in all American countries that serves all American countries that serve the use of Spanish and Portuguese。

Now，Many research concepts are still dominated by ideas and systems developed in Europe and North America for several centuries。If "excellent" is defined by the southern country，What will happen? From the eyes of many scholars，Southern countries do not lack scientific talents，What these countries need to recognize and value their talents。Hal as an example，In Uganda，The mission of Gu Lu University is to become a community、University of serving the community。The university is rooted in the needs of the people，Let the people participate in teaching、Research and ideological contention。Uganda Martyrs University hopes to cultivate a new generation of leaders，bet365 Play online games For the government、Corporate or social organizations bring new methods and leadership。In Mexico，Cross -cultural projects of the University of Veraston University are committed to helping young people better serve the Aboriginal and rural residents who are far away from big cities。

Hal said，We need to let the Southern National System define our own research and evaluation framework，Decisions what should be evaluated and how to evaluate according to your own situation。Disadvantages and deficiencies to avoid existing evaluation methods，Different knowledge producers and users call，Social value of scientific research and knowledge jointly。Only find a better way to identify the value of research，Only to build a more fair knowledge ecosystem。