The COVID-19 pandemic has created a need for policymakers to synthesize scientific evidence，Also reflects the importance of timely evidence review。People are beginning to evaluate ways to rapidly synthesize evidence，Especially bet365 new user promo。Our reporter discusses the characteristics of bet365 new user promo、Interviewed foreign scholars on application status and shortcomings。

　New bet365 new user promo continues to emerge

Present，A large number of scientific research results are published every day，Especially after the outbreak of COVID-19，There are countless related research results。According to "Nature" magazine，In 2020, global scientific researchers not only published more than 100,000 papers on the topic of the new coronavirus pneumonia epidemic，There has also been a significant increase in papers on other scientific topics。Whether it is for researchers or readers，It is not easy to master the key trends in related disciplines。Therefore，Systematic review, a powerful bet365 new user promo collection and evaluation method, has entered the public eye。

A systematic review refers to a clearly defined problem，Adopt systematic、Copyable、Clear and transparent method to identify、Filter、Evaluate all relevant studies，Extract and analyze data from studies included in the review，Then draw comprehensive conclusions。Benefit from the rigor and transparency of the approach，Systematic reviews can reduce bias and random errors，Maximize the production of reasonable and reliable bet365 new user promo。

But systematic review is a scientific research resource-intensive activity。Scholar statistics，Conducting a detailed systematic review on a certain scientific topic takes 6-24 months，It also takes 15 months on average，Few policymakers can wait this long，What they need is to make decisions quickly based on scientific bet365 new user promo。Therefore，How to balance the quality of bet365 new user promo and the speed of review has become a common concern for researchers and policymakers。

　　Quick bet365 new user promo streamlined systematic review

According to Jonathan Breckon, an independent consultant on the “Academic Policy Participation Capacity” project for cooperation between the British government and universities，One way to keep up with the speed of new research being published is through dynamic, real-time bet365 new user promo。For example，The Evidence Information Coordination Center for Policy and Practice at the Institute of Education, University College London, UK, has developed a "Real-time Map of Systematic Reviews of Social Science Research Evidence Relevant to the COVID-19 Epidemic"，Updated regularly on the last Friday of every month，Aims to help people understand and respond to the social impact of the COVID-19 epidemic in a more timely manner。

Another method is the bet365 new user promo gap map，It is characterized by intuitively showing the distribution of systematic reviews and impact assessments，That is, showing the quality of scientific bet365 new user promo for a certain issue and whether there are research gaps。The number of studies covered by an bet365 new user promo gap map can be very large，For example，An bet365 new user promo gap map of child violence prevention research covering 1569 impact evaluations、302 process evaluations、268 systematic reviews。

The advantage of the evidence gap map is that it clearly shows what evidence is currently available、What evidence is missing，But other tools are needed to extract meaning from the evidence。bet365 new user promo can be used as a “speeded up” version of a traditional or standard systematic review。This type of review began in the 1960s，Popular in the first decade of the 21st century，The COVID-19 epidemic reaches its peak。It emerged in the fields of medicine and health policy，But increasingly used in the field of social policy。

Philip Moons, Professor, Department of Public Health and Primary Health Care, University of Leuven, Belgium、Eva Goossens, Professor, Department of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Antwerp, Belgium and David R, Professor, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates.Thompson (David R. Thompson mentioned several differences between bet365 new user promo and traditional systematic reviews in the article "Rapid Review: The Advantages and Disadvantages of Accelerating the Review Process"。

bet365 new user promo seeks to evaluate existing evidence on an issue within a short timeframe，The search range is limited by time，Provides less depth and detail than traditional systematic reviews。Traditional systematic reviews seek to comprehensively and exhaustively evaluate all evidence on a question，Wider search range，The information provided is richer and more detailed。Traditional systematic reviews should not only analyze and integrate the best evidence，Propose policy suggestions based on this，Also raise evidence gaps and uncertainties in existing evidence，To provide suggestions on the direction and focus of future research。Common text and table format for bet365 new user promo，Traditional systematic reviews are mainly text-based。In addition，Clients of rapid evidence reviews often interact closely with reviewers，Because the purpose of review is to serve as a reference for decision-making。

There are some commonly used speed-up methods or "shortcuts" for bet365 new user promo，Include very clearly qualified questions、Control the breadth of the problem、Narrow your search for related research, etc.。

　　Seek speed without sacrificing bet365 new user promo

Munns told this reporter，When policymakers need to make decisions quickly based on scientific evidence，bet365 new user promo can play an important role，And the results of its review are often more timely than those of traditional systematic reviews。There are no policy areas that are particularly suitable or inappropriate for bet365 new user promo，Everything depends on the purpose of the evidence and the urgency of using it。Rapid evidence reviews are now increasingly adopted by policy makers。In the medical and biological sciences abstract database "PubMed"，Articles involving bet365 new user promo have increased significantly since 2015。2015-2019，The number of such articles published per year has increased from nearly 50 to more than 100，Rising to nearly 400 articles in 2020。After the outbreak of COVID-19，Doctor、Surge in demand for bet365 new user promo from policymakers and healthcare administrators。Muns believes，The application potential of bet365 new user promo is considerable，For topics not related to the COVID-19 epidemic，bet365 new user promo will also be more commonly used。

Andrea Tricco, associate professor at the Darla Lana School of Public Health at the University of Toronto, Canada, told this reporter，bet365 new user promo is suitable for any area where a certain number of studies already exist，Not suitable for new and unfamiliar topics。For example，Organizing a bet365 new user promo at the onset of an unprecedented pandemic may not be useful，Because there is too little known information，Insufficient accumulation of evidence of passing quality。Since the outbreak of COVID-19，bet365 new user promo is rapidly becoming widely used，It is expected to help evidence-based decision-making at a broader level in the future，Promote research on non-policy issues，Promote public understanding of science。To achieve both speed and quality，Trico suggests using artificial intelligence technology to assist in bet365 new user promo，Involve research subjects in a bet365 new user promo process，Comparative analysis of the results of bet365 new user promo and traditional systematic review on the same question。

Munns said，Research has shown，Rapid evidence reviews produce similar conclusions to traditional systematic reviews，But people still need to pay attention to the limitations and potential pitfalls of bet365 new user promo。Due to consensus、A unified bet365 new user promo methodology has not yet been established，Many rapid evidence reviews do not clearly describe their methodology，This results in the research search process not being replicable，The differences in the conclusions obtained are difficult to explain。“Taking shortcuts” may also cause bias，This is exactly the negative impact that systematic reviews try to avoid。Reminders such as Sandy Oliver, professor of public policy at University College London, UK，bet365 new user promo has “neither meets the stringency requirements”，Risk of not meeting timeliness requirements；For social policy issues，The risks of applying bet365 new user promo may be higher，Because this type of problem is often more complex、Highly controversial，And related research is diverse。

Munns emphasized，Whatever method is used，Rapid evidence reviews must follow the core principles of traditional systematic reviews，The systematic nature cannot be discounted。When bet365 new user promo deviates from method specifications，Clear and detailed instructions must be given。"Fast" does not mean sloppy and inferior，bet365 new user promo cannot ignore or intentionally bypass the quality assurance link，The pursuit of speed at the expense of scientific quality is not advisable。And，Assessing the need for bet365 new user promo is critical。bet365 new user promo is mainly suitable for situations where evidence-based decision-making is urgently needed，Rather than becoming the “gold standard”，A complete systematic review is still the most generalizable。When there are strict requirements for the accuracy of conclusions，Traditional systematic reviews are still the best choice。Bracken talks about，Balancing speed and quality of bet365 new user promo is a challenge，Sharing experiences and insights helps researchers achieve a better balance。current，Many bet365 new user promo tasks are carried out in "isolation" from each other，Scholars and policymakers should work more across disciplines、Continuous improvement of bet365 new user promo during cross-disciplinary knowledge exchange。