Pass review is a must for the publication of modern academic research results。June，Associate Professor of Education Psychology and Psychological Counseling of Monash University in Australia, Kelly-Ann Allen, posted on the social media platform，"As a journal editor，I did not participate in the review when I saw some people published a paper，regret。Now，It's getting harder to find the reviewer，This clearly delays the time for publishing the paper "。This article has caused hundreds of replies from other scholars。Later，Allen and others combined with existing research and analyzed the content of the reply，Write the article "Improvement of Peer Review: Wide Opinions from the" Twitter "platform" (hereinafter referred to as "Improvement of Peer Reviews"，Published on the Australian journal "College Teaching and Practice Magazine"。other，Allen and Australia Tasmania University Education Innovation Senior Lecturer Joseph Crawford (Joseph Crawford)、Professor Lucas Walsh, a professor at the School of Education, Culture and Social Sciences of Monash University, and others introduced their analysis results。In -depth understanding of the problems and possible solutions existing in the evaluation of the same trip，This reporter interviewed the team's relevant experts and scholars。

　　Bet365 app download

Pass review plays an important role in guaranteeing and supervising academic research and academic publishing quality，There is still much room for improvement in the existing mechanism。"Improvement of Peer Review" summarizes the publishing delay、Insufficient number of reviewers、The views of anonymous review are different、Some reviewers feel the problems of paying and income imbalance。

One，The efficiency of bet365 live casino games peer review is not ideal，Lead of publishing delay。Study discovered，From the collection of data to the publishing of the paper, it is obviously stretched in the 20th century，After entering the 21st century, there is no significant change。After the target journal has been determined，The time from the paper to the publishing is still longer，This phenomenon is more obvious in some disciplines，Such as business and economics journals。The reason is multiple aspects，In addition to the increase in the total number of thesis publication, the challenge to the supply and demand relationship，In terms of peer review，There are still scholars who have not been fully used in the academic circles.、Some scholars are not willing to participate in peer reviews or have a slower response to the review invitation。Publishing delay is not conducive to academic dialogue，Give researchers、Decision makers and practitioners、Related organizations have come on a negative impact，It makes it difficult for them to conduct research on scientific research issues that may have significant significance in a shorter period of time，This pair of time is strong、Research fields that need to take effective practical actions are particularly unfavorable。If the reference or the incident involved in the dissertation is outdated，It may also damage the application value of the research results。other，Because the results are one of the "core currencies" in the academic world，Publishing delay on the career development of researchers may also have a negative impact，Doctoral students who are waiting for faculty or promotion opportunities、The impact of holding a short -term contract and a group of researchers in early career is even more prominent。

Its two，Insufficient number of reviewers，Excessive reliance on a small number of scholars。Journal editors tend to invite experts in a research field for evaluation，Famous scholars Bet365 app download have received more evaluation requests than other researchers。But，On the one hand，With the increase in the number of research results every year, the number of research results continues to increase，It is difficult for well -known scholars to bear all peer review work，Some scholars will also complain that the number of requests receives too much for the review request、Working hours are too nervous。On the other hand，Young scholars are interested in participating in the evaluation work，Also due to the lack of corresponding information、Training or guidance is difficult to compete。"Improvement of Peer Review" also noticed，Researchers outside North America and Europe are still at the position of the edge of the global academic peer evaluation system，That is to say，The peer review is completed by scholars from a few countries，Representative is insufficient，The resources of the potential reviewer remain to be further developed and used。other，With the increasing internal and multinational research cooperation within the country，Under the principle of following the conflict of the interests of the reviewer，The range of potential reviewers is further narrowed。

Its three，Different views on anonymous evaluation in the academic community。Some scholars call for the transparency of the evaluation process，For example，Try to let go of the anonymous system，Accept the open peer review，Dialogue between the more open reviewer and the author of the thesis，To achieve the promotion of review and accountability、Reduce the unnecessary criticism of the manuscript、Purpose of improving evaluation feedback quality。But some scholars emphasize，Reviewer pays more attention to anonymous safety environment，If you face the risk of exposed identity，They are not willing to participate in the review，It is also more difficult to give the honest review opinions。For this，"Improvement of Peer Reviews" believes，bet365 live casino games The long -term goal of the academic world is to build a safe academic environment，Researchers at different levels can assume assured to exchange ideas。

Four，Some reviewers feel that paying and income imbalance。Academic publishers profit from journal subscriptions and distribution，But the income generally does not benefit directly the reviewer。In some academic institutions，Pass review work is classified as a must -have for default service or contract signing。This is derived from a concept of reciprocity，That is, the researchers' own research results were evaluated by peer researchers，Naturally, it is necessary to provide reviews for colleagues。But，Some scholars report，Review is free and beyond the working time of the contract，A large number of review invitations、Requirements to complete the review on time、The workload increased due to the evaluation，It also makes them feel tired。and the influence of special circumstances such as new crown pneumonia epidemic on different reviewers is also different，For example，During the closed management period, the reviewer of young children faces the problem of increasing parenting pressure。

　　Comprehensive improvement of peer review

The above problems existing above for peer review，Walsh and Crordford and others introduced to reporters the feasibility analysis and significance interpretation of solutions proposed in the online communication and interaction of scholars。

An interesting fact is，The origin of this research is the "beautiful accident" promoted by a social media post。Walsh told reporters，The social media platform can play a certain role in discovering and solving the existing problems in peer evaluation in the future。In the short term，Hundreds of replys to the original posts gathered to be rich、Criticism from collective wisdom for peer review、Opinions and how to perfect its suggestions。Although from a statistical perspective，These replies may not bet365 live casino games be representative，But it can indeed provide inspiration for further research and exploration。Crusteford, edited by the editor -in -chief of the "Journal of College Teaching and Practice"，Need to treat the social media platform with caution。Editors of him and other journals can try to use the social media platform to recruit reviewers，But，He is not sure if this is sustainable。Large journals need to send a large number of review requests every year，If you contact social media as a channel，It may allow researchers who are active on social media platforms to directly cancel the homepage of the journal。other，In the field of open access，Some journals are advancing a more transparent review process，If you use social media unlimitedly to seek general opinions，may affect the quality of the content of the dissertation。

"Improvement of Peer Review" proposes，Providing higher -quality peer reviews requires macro -level changes，But some simple and feasible measures can be implemented immediately。Crusford said in an interview，First，Before entering the peer review process，Periodicals can provide feedback first to provide the author as a reference to modify the paper，This can make the reviewer who can review the peer review to review higher -quality papers，Work more pleasantly。Second，Journal editing can better identify and refuse papers that do not meet the requirements，Avoid those who are unlikely to publish the papers for review，Only papers that will be edited by editing quality review are sent to peer review。Walsh also proposed，Journal should think more about how to improve the method of hiring reviewers and what kind of work to distribute to the reviewer。Journal should be more customized for researchers in the field of thesis research.，and simplify the process of accepting or refusing to evaluate the invitation of the review。For example，When choosing a potential reviewer，It can be divided Bet365 lotto review into two aspects: research method or research content，Make the chosen reviewer easier，and let the reviewer focus on the best perspective instead of all face。One of the long -term goals is，Improve the evaluation ability of young scientific researchers，and provide them with more opportunities for review，Let them become a vital army for perfect peer evaluation mechanisms。

The solution to the discussion of "Improvement of Peer Evaluation" focuses on two directions: let young researchers in early career and researchers from developing countries participate more and better participate in the global peer review work。Walsh told reporters，The development of early professional researchers on the academic road may face many difficulties，This is also the case when participating in the peer review。Journal must provide them with more support，Enhance their confidence and ability，Opportunities to provide them with the opportunity to participate in the peer review process and gain relevant experience。This potential reviewer can bring rich professional knowledge and ideas with innovative consciousness，and help reduce the pressure of the peer evaluation system。He particularly emphasized，To solve the problem of insufficient representativeness of these two groups in the global peer review system，Is a global challenge。

Crusford said，Fairness to maintain global knowledge production is the key issue，A more tolerant knowledge production system means that researchers should contribute to it。Some researchers hope that the journal can find the right reviewer when he published the research results，I usually did not participate in the evaluation work。If you can guarantee each author every time he publishes his own paper，Can participate in the work of evaluating the papers of others one or twice，Of course it is an ideal ratio，But it is difficult to achieve。So，You can allow early professional researchers and doctoral candidates to participate in the peer review appropriately，Bet365 lotto review Let them learn and improve themselves from the thesis author。other，Crusford thinks，It is also important to recognize that the difference between academic publishers。The top journals with rich resources are hired the reviewer with the assistance of the editorial department，But many journals are not like this。They organize and manage by a small number of scholars themselves，Only have less resources，But they can still promote high -quality knowledge sharing。These journals are particularly required to actively participate in the review，Critical interpretation of research results and provide feedback。