Peer bet365 champions league is a necessary part of the publication of modern academic research results。June，Kelly-Ann Allen, associate professor at the School of Educational Psychology and Counseling at Monash University in Australia, posted on social media platforms，“As a Journal Editor，I saw some people published papers but did not participate in the bet365 champions league，Sorry。Now，It’s getting harder and harder to find reviewers，This obviously delays the publication of the paper”。This article triggered hundreds of replies from other scholars。Following，Allen et al. compiled and analyzed the reply content based on existing research，Written the article "Improving Peer bet365 champions league: Broad Opinions from the "Twitter" Platform" (hereinafter referred to as "Improving Peer bet365 champions league")，And published in the Australian journal "Journal of Higher Education Teaching and Practice"。In addition，Allen also talked with Joseph Crawford, senior lecturer in educational innovation at the University of Tasmania, Australia、Lucas Walsh, a professor at the School of Education, Culture and Society at Monash University, and others wrote an article on the "Dialogue" website to introduce their analysis results。To gain a deeper understanding of the problems and possible solutions to peer bet365 champions league，Our reporter interviewed relevant experts and scholars of the team。

　　bet365 champions league are many problems with the existing mechanism

Peer bet365 champions league plays an important role in ensuring and supervising the quality of academic research and academic publishing，There is still much room for improvement in the existing mechanism。Improving Peer bet365 champions league summarizes publication delays、Insufficient number of reviewers、Different opinions on anonymous reviewers、Some reviewers feel that there is an imbalance between effort and benefit。

一，Peer bet365 champions league efficiency is not ideal，Resulting in publication delay。There are research findings，The process from data collection to publication was significantly lengthened in the 20th century，There is no significant change after entering the 21st century。After the target journal has been determined，The time from paper submission to publication is still long，This phenomenon is more obvious in some disciplines，such as business and economics journals。There are many reasons for this，In addition to the challenges posed by the increase in the total number of published papers to the relationship between supply and demand，In terms of peer bet365 champions league，There are still scholars who are not well-known in the academic community but are not fully utilized、Some scholars are not willing to participate in peer bet365 champions league or respond slowly to bet365 champions league invitations, etc.。And publication delays are not conducive to scholarly dialogue，To researchers、Decision makers and practitioners、Relevant organizations have had negative impacts，Making it difficult for them to conduct research on scientific research issues that may be of great significance in a shorter period of time，This pair has strong timeliness、Research areas in urgent need of effective practical action are particularly disadvantaged。If the references cited in the paper or the events involved are out of date，It may also damage the application value of research results。In addition，Because publishing results is one of the "core currencies" of academia，Publication delays may also have a negative impact on researchers’ career development，For doctoral candidates waiting for faculty or promotion opportunities、The impact is more prominent among groups such as researchers holding short-term contracts and early career researchers。

二，Insufficient number of reviewers，Over-reliance on a small number of scholars。Journal editors tend to invite experts in a certain research field for bet365 champions league，Reputable scholars receive more bet365 champions league requests than other researchers。However，On the one hand，With the increasing number of research results to be published every year，It is difficult for well-known scholars to undertake all peer bet365 champions league work，Some scholars also complain about receiving too many bet365 champions league requests、Working hours are too tight。On the other hand，Young scholars are even interested in participating in bet365 champions league work，Also due to lack of corresponding information、Difficulty training or guidance。"Improving Peer bet365 champions league" also noted，Researchers outside North America and Europe remain on the margins of the global academic peer bet365 champions league system，In other words，Peer bet365 champions league is done by scholars from a small number of countries，Underrepresented，The resources of potential reviewers need to be further developed and utilized。In addition，With the increasing intra-country and transnational research collaboration，Under the principle of avoiding conflicts of interest of reviewers，The scope of potential reviewers has been further narrowed。

　Third，Academic circles have different views on anonymous bet365 champions league。Some scholars call for improving the transparency of the bet365 champions league process，For example，Try to liberalize the anonymity system，Accept open peer bet365 champions league，Enable a more open dialogue between reviewers and paper authors，To achieve accountability in promoting evaluation、Reduce unnecessary criticism of the manuscript、To improve the quality of bet365 champions league feedback, etc.。But some scholars emphasize that，Reviewers pay more attention to the anonymous and safe environment，If you face the risk of exposing your identity，They are less willing to participate in the bet365 champions league，It is also more difficult to give honest and pertinent comments。To this，"Improving Peer bet365 champions league" believes，The long-term goal of the academic community is to build a safe academic environment，Enable researchers at different levels to exchange ideas with confidence。

　Fourth，Some reviewers feel that there is an imbalance between effort and benefit。Academic publishers profit from journal subscriptions and distribution，However, the income generally does not directly benefit the reviewers。In some academic institutions，Peer bet365 champions league work is classified as a default service or required for contract signing。This stems from a concept of reciprocity，That is, the researcher’s own research results are reviewed by peer researchers，It is also natural to provide comments for fellow researchers。However，Reflections from some scholars，Commentary is free for them and goes beyond contracted working hours，A large number of bet365 champions league invitations、Complete the bet365 champions league requirements on time、Increased workload due to comments，It also makes them feel deeply tired。Special circumstances such as the COVID-19 epidemic have different impacts on different reviewers，For example，Reviewers with young children face increased parenting pressure during the closed management period。

　　Comprehensive improvement of peer bet365 champions league

In view of the above problems in peer bet365 champions league，Walsh, Crawford and others introduced to reporters the feasibility analysis and significance interpretation of the solutions proposed by scholars in online exchanges。

An interesting fact is，This study was prompted by a “beautiful accident” caused by a social media post。Walsh told reporters，Social media platforms can play a certain role in discovering and solving existing problems in peer bet365 champions league in the future。In the short term，Hundreds of replies to the original post gathered rich、Criticism of peer bet365 champions league from the collective wisdom、Insights and suggestions on how to improve it。Although statistically speaking，These replies may not be representative，But it can indeed provide inspiration for further research and exploration。Crawford, who serves as the editor-in-chief of the Journal of College Teaching and Practice, emphasized，Social media platforms need to be treated with caution。He and editors at other journals could try using social media platforms to recruit reviewers，However，He’s not sure if this is sustainable。Large journals need to send a large number of bet365 champions league requests every year，If communicating through social media，Researchers active on social media platforms may be asked to directly unfollow the journal homepage。In addition，In the field of open access，Some journals are promoting a more transparent bet365 champions league process，If unrestricted use of social media to seek general advice，May affect the quality of the paper bet365 champions league content。

"Improving Peer bet365 champions league" proposed，Providing higher quality peer bet365 champions league requires macro-level changes，But some simple and feasible measures can be implemented immediately。Crawford said in the interview，First，Before entering the peer bet365 champions league process，The journal can provide feedback in advance for the author to use as a reference to revise the paper，Doing so will allow peer reviewers to bet365 champions league higher quality papers，Work more happily。Secondly，Journal editors can better identify and reject papers that do not meet requirements，Avoid sending papers that are unlikely to be published，Only papers that pass the editorial quality bet365 champions league will be sent for peer bet365 champions league。Walsh also proposed，Journals should think more about how to improve the way they hire reviewers and what kind of work they distribute to reviewers。Journals should do more to tailor bet365 champions league requests to researchers most relevant to the paper’s research area，And simplify the process of accepting or rejecting bet365 champions league invitations。For example，When selecting potential reviewers，The expertise matching process can be divided into two aspects: research methods or research content，Making reviewer selection easier，And let the reviewers focus on their best perspectives without covering everything。One of the long-term goals is，Improving the evaluation skills of young scientific researchers，And provide them with more opportunities for bet365 champions league，Let them become a new force in improving the peer bet365 champions league mechanism。

The solutions discussed in "Improving Peer bet365 champions league" focus on two directions: increasing and better participation of young researchers in early career and researchers from developing countries in global peer bet365 champions league work。Walsh told reporters，Early career researchers may face many difficulties on their academic path，The same is true when participating in peer bet365 champions league。Journals need to provide them with more support，Increase their confidence and abilities，Provide them with opportunities to participate in the peer bet365 champions league process and gain relevant experience。This group of potential reviewers can bring a wealth of expertise and innovative ideas，And help reduce the stress of the peer bet365 champions league system。He emphasized，Address the underrepresentation of these two groups in the global peer bet365 champions league system，is a global challenge。

Crawford said，Maintaining fairness in global knowledge production is a key issue，A more inclusive knowledge production system means that researchers should all contribute to it。Some researchers hope that journals can find suitable reviewers when publishing research results，I usually do not participate in the bet365 champions league work。If it were possible to guarantee that each author would receive the same amount of time every time he published his own paper，Can participate in reviewing other people's papers once or twice，Of course it is an ideal ratio，But difficult to achieve。Therefore，Early career researchers and PhD candidates can be allowed to participate in peer bet365 champions league as appropriate，Let them better learn from the paper authors and improve themselves。In addition，Crawford thinks，It is also important to recognize the differences among academic publishers。Top journals with rich resources hire reviewers with the assistance of their editorial departments，But many journals are not like this。They are self-organized and managed by a small group of scholars，Have only fewer resources，But they can still promote high-quality knowledge sharing。These journals especially need those who are willing to actively participate in bet365 champions league，Critically interpret research results and provide feedback。