Comprehensive foreign media reports  The British "Nature" magazine "Nature -Ecology and Evolution" recently published the research by the Global Change of Michigan State University and Earth Observation Center, Olivia Smith, and others. The obstacles faced by the exclusion group in history for a long time "。Studies show，The existing peer review system makes researchers at specific backgrounds at an unfair disadvantage。

Scientific progress and the career development of scientific researchers are closely related to the results of the scientific bet365 best casino games research results published in peer review issues。Despite the "diversity in the scientific community、Equality、tolerance "is getting louder and louder，But the author who has successfully passed the peer review is still concentrated in a specific group。Smith and others analyzed 31 colleagues review data of 312740 biological science papers involved in research，To understand whether the population characteristics of the thesis author affect the results of the peer review。

Researchers discovered，Scientific researchers who belong to the historically rejected group have a higher probability of receiving negative peer review results，Including scholars working in scientific research institutions in Asian countries、Scholars from countries with low Bet365 app download human development indexes from official language or UN human development index; some studies have evaluated the diversification of the composition of the members such as the double -blind peer or the constituent of the relevant personnel such as members，to reduce the impact of gender inequality evaluation results。other，Rare research and evaluation of other solutions to reduce prejudice solutions; rare journals have implemented policies for reducing prejudice。Smith and others inspected 541 peer evaluation policies for ecological and evolutionary journals，Only 15.9%of them adopt double -blind peer review，2.03%mentioned the issue of social fairness in the guidance of the peer review;，Mainly the United States and the United Kingdom。

Smith and others said，bet365 best casino games This research has its limitations，For example，The rejection of the draft is caused by the prejudice of the peer members，Still because the manuscript does not meet the requirements of the journal，This is difficult to determine。but，Since hundreds of thousands of papers are displayed，The author's population characteristics have a good prediction of peer review results，This shows that the peer review system needs to be improved。

Tom Tregenza, a professor of ecological ecology at the University of Ekstet University in the United Kingdom, talks，"Scientific researchers often think that ideological progress is advanced、Resolutely oppose ethnic and gender discrimination，But as a group，We have been reluctant to work hard to introduce the double -blind peer Bet365 app download review。Double -blind peer review is not perfect，But we need more data to prove that it is not desirable to be satisfied with the existing review system，Because scientists will inevitably be affected by prejudice "。

Smith said，"What prompts us to carry out this study is obviously prejudiced comments that are observed as the essay author or cooperative lecturers，and the personal experience of receiving the results of peer reviews with unfairness。We hope that this research can promote other scholars quickly、Record the extent of the prejudice phenomenon of peer review，and identify effective solutions，Promote more powerful policies for academic journals，to improve the fairness of peer review "。

　　（Wang Youran/Compilation）