As a successful scholar in the field of Chinese material culture and art history research，Kugege's exposition angle and perspective are relatively novel，Especially its creative research results such as "material culture", "image culture" and "visual culture" interpretation method，attracted the attention of scholars of Chinese art history researchers。Now，A large number of generating and propagation of images will inevitably affect the development of styling art，And Kuge's research on the art of image age，Provided a theoretical help for the innovative practice of the current styling art。

　　bet365 Play online games

　　Ke Logg's early dedicated to the study of the material culture and social status of China，"Changwu Zhi" is the research results in this area。As a classic work about the consumption of late Ming culture，"Changwu Zhi" believes，"Things" play an important role in the cultural society in the late Ming Dynasty，such as calligraphy、Bronze、Jade carving and other cultural game products are the specific performance of things。In this book，Ke Lige mainly draws on the learning method of social and cultural theory，Research on the history of art from the perspective of items，Explaining how these items become consumer products for late literati，and the value and meaning of these consumer products in the late Ming society。

In "The Images and Visuality of the Ming Dynasty"，Ke Lige uses "image culture" and "visual culture" as the research method into the Ming Dynasty art field。As the author said，"When writing this book，The art history community of English countries is being keen on the discussion of ‘visual culture’。At least part of which is around the question，What are the items or which type of images，I did not be valued before，But now it should be included in the newly expanded art history research。So，This book uses the category of ‘picture painting’ to connect painting works and printing works, as well as images on items such as ceramic or lacquerware，This can be regarded as a contribution to that theory "。The author from the perspective of historicalism，Enter the visual cultural context of China in the Ming Dynasty，Then use the explanation of image culture，from small and big，On the other hand, the model of the consumption era in the Ming Dynasty，On this basis, further glimpse the important events and important people in the history of the history。

"Fanping: The Royal Arts and Power of China in the Ming Dynasty" is also the case for writing.。As a Keferge study the art history of the Ming Dynasty in the Ming Dynasty，This book takes the hereditary aristocratic aristocratic nobles and female artists in the history of the Ming Dynasty as the protagonist，Put in the central position of the Ming Dynasty culture and art。The author adopts the method of explanation of the case，By discussing the seven aspects of the seven aspects such as bet365 best casino games the "Fan Screen", "King of the King", "King of the King", "King of the King", "King of the King", "The Jewelry of the Liang Wang", "The Bronze of the King" "，Talking the history and geography of the vassal state，Based on this, the role of the royal family's promotion of the culture of the Ming Dynasty，Political Culture of Tube's Pioneer，can be described as a small see big，Deep layer，Tracking the source，Elapsed Chinese culture from a special perspective、Art、The relationship between history and politics。

　　About the construction and analysis of the "art history" in social culture

"Chinese Art" and "Ya Debt: The Social Art of Wen Zhengming" is Koder's use of interdisciplinary、New angle method of writing Chinese art history。"Chinese Art" Single in terms of the title，The interpretation method seems to be the interpretation of the history of Chinese art general，However, Kolg did not continue the concept interpretation of ancient traditional art history or the concept of academic history，but from the perspective of philosophy，Place the explanation of art in the context of Chinese culture for inspection、Research，That is to specifically explain the essential problem of art，What is art、The identity of art works belongs、Derivative and survival status of the art market。Ke Loger's interpretation of "Chinese art" broke the traditional art history as the description method of time -sequentially，Instead, it is divided into five categories such as "tomb art", "court art", "artistic art", "art in the life of literati", "art bought and sold in the market"，Among them, bet365 best casino games various historical backgrounds and art events are interspersed，Ancient and modern complementary，Chinese and Western interpretation，step by step。

Ke Lige's research involves multiple fields，The book "Ya Debt: Wen Zhengming's Social Art" has not followed the traditional character research method and traditional calligraphy and painting analysis method，Instead of in the context of historical culture，Looking at the situation of Wen Zhengming's creation works from the perspective of "Social Social Social" and "Humanity and Essays"。Based on this, refer to sociology、Methods of History and Art History，Re -examine the life of Wen Zhengming and art works，Then restore the relationship between the constructive relationship with society in the field of activity。The writing method and research perspective of this book is in the field of art history research，Especially in case research has its unique significance，Not only breaks through the "example of ten，Laws "Research Rules，and caused the re -examination and thinking of Chinese and Western scholars 'research on artists' cases。Ru Bai Qian Shen's "The World of Fu Shan: The Change of Chinese Calligraphy in the Seventeenth Century", "The Confucian and entertainment of Fu Shan: A Case Study of Arts and Social History"、Xue Longchun's "Yayi Mountain: Wang Chong's Life and Calligraphy"，All reflects the construction process and influence of the perspective of "art history" in Chinese and Western social and cultural social culture。

　　Contemporary Enlightenment of the Research Method of Kuje's Art History

bet365 Play online games Koder's academic map is mainly the history of material culture and art in the Ming Dynasty，Its academic research path from early research on "material culture" to the study of "visual culture" and "image culture"，Research on the field of Chinese art/history，Research on the case of Chinese calligraphy and painting art again。Cut in from the perspective of consumption，Discussion of non -focus issues that are not concerned by the history of mainstream art，However, it is this "non -focus problem" but it contains huge information and value。Therefore，His research on the history of Chinese art has grasped the mainstream development from general，and painting and calligraphy as one of them，It is also the focus of research。In addition，Ke Lige and Chinese scholars are different from the methods valued by Chinese scholars，Taking the case study of Wen Zhengming Wen Zhengming, a literati and calligraphy, as an example，Most Chinese scholars study Wen Zhengming through research through its annual spectrum and work analysis，and carry out "research" and "narrative"，and Ke Loger set off from Wen Zhengming's daily life，Place it in the environment of social culture，By explaining Wen Zhengming's life narrative to construct its association with society。

Relatively speaking，Koder's research on art history more values ​​the social environment and cultural background of art survival，Analyze the identity of the artist from the perspective of sociology、Communication、Capital and other factors，Then make a sensor explanation bet365 live casino games and new solution。This kind of cross -domain、Cross Silication、The study of the new angle and the new method is the academic characteristics of Kolg。At the same time，This is also a historian of Chinese and Western art、Sociologists、The communication and communication between anthropologists and historians open up new paths。

​​Everything has two sides，Although Kolg's research path and method of Chinese art history have aroused widespread attention from academic circles，But in some ways, they are also questioned and even criticized by some scholars。Popularization of speech narratives in its works，The vagueness of the description method、One -sided，and the popularization of the perspective of the exposition，Especially in the way of explaining the academic language of "academic monograph" with Chinese scholars "considering words", it can be described as very different。This also reflects the differences between Chinese and Western scholars to a certain extent。Most of the reading objects written and published by Western scholars are based on Western readers，Lack of research from Chinese scholars' perspectives，Coupled with the differences in the academic background of the translator，Naturally, there will be differences with the author's original intention。In short,，Research on the history of Chinese art due to the unique perspective、The frontier of the concept and solid literature，Open the new horizons of art history research，worthy of our reference and thinking。

　　(Author Unit: School of Fine Arts and Design of Shenzhen University)