In the contemporary discussion of how to do philosophy，According to general opinions，There are two ways to advance: one is a research -oriented research，Another emphasizes the connection between the history of philosophy and philosophy，I even think that philosophy is the history of philosophy。Generally speaking，Analysis of philosophy focuses on the inquiry of philosophical issues，The traditional philosophical research of the European continent emphasizes the ones from history。Of course，Here the so -called analysis philosophy and European philosophy division，is in a very rough sense，It does not have logical strictness。

Different understanding of how to do philosophy，Make people have a different attitude towards the classic theory of philosophy。Researchers who are guided by philosophical problems，In contemporary philosophical learning and research，Classic philosophical theory in history is of only considerable marginal significance: beginners should start their own learning from textbooks of various branches of philosophy; if not for special historical research，General philosophical scholars do not need to read those obscure philosophy classics。In the translation bet365 best casino games preface written for "The History of the 20th Century Analysis of Philosophy"，Ye Feng said: "Some classic original works that are clearly expressed can be read as supplementary readings for textbooks。As for those obscure and difficult to understand and explain the controversy, the original works，Except researchers in the history of professional philosophy，General researchers do not necessarily need to study。"Ye Feng's point of view，From the point of view of some scholars advocating philosophy, philosophy,，It may be extremely misleading and even "danger"。Because in their opinion，The so -called philosophical problems can only come from the history of philosophy，By separated from the "philosophical problem" of the history of philosophy or it is a fake problem，Either it is not a question of philosophy at all。Based on this reason，The appropriate starting point for their advocates philosophical learning and research should be the history of philosophy，This means that people should face the philosophical classics seriously and seriously; and，They can also give up many examples，and use this to illustrate the importance of philosophy from philosophical learning and research。

From the perspective of researchers -oriented researchers，Wittgenstein is not from the philosophy class，I haven't read a few books of philosophy，Bet365 app download and classic works in the history of philosophy are not very familiar with，But this does not prevent him from thinking about the in -depth thinking of philosophical issues，and finally became an important philosopher; from this，They think，The history of philosophy is not the essential of philosophical learning and research，Wittgenstein is a dazzling example。Where some scholars who advocate philosophy, philosophy,，They generally acknowledge Vitgustein's contribution to philosophy，But I think that it can contribute to philosophy directly from the problem，Only a few genius can you do，Therefore, it should not be a role model for most general scholars to follow up。Some scholars even sarcastically say，Those scholars who advocate philosophical learning and research should directly start from the problem，It may be excessively highly estimated to have your own intelligence level。

So，How did Wittgenstein think of the history of philosophy? December 22, 1933，Wittgenstein is for C. L.，Talking about his view of the history of philosophy: "Unfortunately you have to read a lot of history of philosophy，It is difficult to help you clarify your chaos because reading。Understanding the thoughts of others or what is really difficult to learn from other people's chaos，Especially when they live a long time ago，Speaking of a philosophical language that is different Bet365 app download from you。The only thing that can be done has always been，Tell you what you don’t understand what they are talking about。If you really have your own thoughts，You will know that it is difficult for others to understand it accurately，Then you will know that you can hardly understand other people’s thoughts。I know，If it is a professor of philosophy，You have to understand what everyone said ... but you are not a professor，So enjoy your freedom! "

In the letter written by Vitgustein on the top，We can see such a few layers of meaning: one，Reading the history of philosophy in large quantities is a regrettable thing，Because this not only does not help clarify my confusion，In fact, it is difficult to learn what to learn。This is the case，In most classic philosophers, they live in the distant past era，They fuck the philosophical language of their respective eras，This makes it difficult for us to understand what they said。Its two，After recognizing the difficulty of understanding，The only thing we can do，It is a kind of rational honesty，"Tell you what you don't understand what they are talking about"，Not a confidant、Self -deceive thought I understood them。Its three，Aside from the factors of the times regardless of，A real thinker will recognize，Even the people of the same era，Thinking of mutual understanding bet365 live casino games is also a very difficult thing。Its four，Professor of philosophy because of professional relationship，I will say that I understand what every philosopher said，But for those who are not a professor of philosophy，This "speech" is an unnecessary burden。

The third meaning mentioned in the previous paragraph，Dang as a talk about Wittgenstein's own experience。1945，Wittgenstein in the preface written by "Philosophy Research"，It is said that he will consider publishing this book，Mainly because of "I learned，My results are passing by lecture、Printing and discussing the process of transmission，A variety of misunderstandings，More or less becoming bland or fragmented。This stinging my vanity，long difficult to calm down "。August 23, 1949，Wittgenstein is giving P. Slava's letter continued: "I set up a belief step by step in my life，That is, some people cannot let them be understood by each other，or at least only a very narrow range of it is understood。If this happens，So everyone tends to think that the other party does not want to understand，Then there will be endless misunderstanding。"here，We can clearly see，Wittgenstein repeatedly apply，It is so difficult to understand each other between people。

Write to Wittgenstein to C. L.，We can also see such a distinction，That is, the thinker and the professor of philosophy Bet365 app download are not the same thing: the person will clearly recognize，It is very difficult for people to understand each other in ideology; professors of philosophy say they understand what every philosopher says。According to this distinction of Wittgenstein，On the question of how to view the history of philosophy，Professor of thinkers and philosophy will hold different positions: the thinker is relatively less valued so much that the history of philosophy，Professor of philosophy is based on the history of professor philosophy。As far as Wittgenstein himself is concerned，We know，Wittgenstein has replaced Moore's position，Professor of philosophy at Cambridge for a while，But he always holds a doubtful attitude towards the academic philosophical research，And often advise your students not to use philosophical research as a profession。1947，Wittgenstein also took the initiative to resign from the position of the professor of Cambridge philosophy。In this sense，Wittgenstein himself is more a thinker rather than a professor of philosophy。

　　bet365 best casino games