Moral Disagreement is a phenomenon common in human society，It refers to a certain concept of different value subjects for a certain moral scene、The legitimacy (rationality) of behavior or rules made different judgments，Different parties think that the reason for their own holding is sufficient、Fire defense，Formed "Public Story and Public Personalized，The difficult situation of my mother -in -law is reasonable "。The root cause of moral differences is difficult to solve.，All parties who generate differences think that their moral intuition is reliable，The moral judgment made is correct，The facts rely on the moral defense of the moral defense are clear、Full reasons。So，It is difficult to convince each other and change the original position。but，People also noticed，The rationality of moral judgment not only involves individual defense，It also involves the objectivity and publicity of moral judgment。So，Philosophers have always paid close attention to the study of moral differences。Especially since the 1930s，Affected by logic empiricalism，Western ethics, especially bet365 best casino games Yuan Ethics ZTE, emotionalism、Intuitionalism、Non -consularist positions represented by expressionism have become an important path for the study of moral differences，Their supporters advocate canceling moral language、Cognitive significance of moral judgment。But，This approach is facing slide moral subjectism、Risk of relativity，It is also difficult to find a rational path to solve moral differences。In recent years，Criticism with non -cognitiveism，Ethical Differential Issues Research have undergone "Better Turn"，That is, to grasp the essence of moral differences from the perspective of epistemology and seek a path to solve moral differences。

On the study of moral differences，Non -recognitionist and cognitiveism to "what is moral differences", "How is moral differences produced" and "why moral differences are worthy of attention" and "how moral differences solve" and other core issues. It's a different answer。

Long -term，Although most people want to avoid 桎梏，But whether it is cognitive differences or attitude differences about moral differences?。According to the position of non -recognition,，Moral differences reflect people in value preferences、Differences in taste and emotion，These differences are not related to moral cognition。They don’t think there are Bet365 app download objective moral facts，Also doubt about human moral cognitive ability，So non -informedists understand moral differences as different attitudes between different values ​​subjects。This kind of subjective interpretation and attribution to moral differences although it meets the intuition of many ordinary people，But it cannot effectively respond to the threat of moral relativism，It is even used to be used as a moral diversity、Defense for moral tolerance，It also presets the division of facts and value division。

Non -recognition of the treatment of moral differences cannot be fundamentally narrowed from fundamental differences、Expand moral consensus。So，More and more criticisms，People start to re -examine the beliefs involved in moral differences、The relationship between attitude and intention，Hope to portray the foundation foundation of moral differences，Clarify the role of belief in moral differences，Overcoming the difficulties faced by non -recognitionism，Find a rational path to solve moral differences。

In fact，CHARLES STEVEVENSON mentioned in "Ethics and Language"，"Differences in any attitude originated from the differences in faith"。So，Place the problem of moral differences in the dual research field of contemporary ethics and epistemology，From bet365 live casino games moral realism、Types of moral differences from the perspective of moral language and moral cognition、Features、Causes and Solution Mechanisms Carry out Cognitive Theory，Not only conducive to comprehensive understanding of the essence of moral differences，It is also conducive to the integration of consensus through faith and then realize the attitude、Reduce moral differences。

Unknown excessive emphasis on emotion and irrational factors in moral differences，So it is easy to fall into the relativism of relativity，3269_3303，Try to examine the beliefs involved in moral differences in the background of realism、Attitude、Internal connection of factors such as intent。Because，Although the moral differences between different value subjects are specifically manifested as a difference in moral judgment and attitude，But these differences are rooted in the differences in moral cognition。Realism behind moral differences and disputes between non -realism、The meaning of moral language and the rationality of moral judgment are closely related to moral cognition。Similar differences with other types，Moral differences are also based on the beliefs and judgments of the subject on the object。So，Understanding moral differences should start with differences at the level of belief，Bet365 lotto review Elimination of moral differences should also start from the unanimousness of reaching moral cognition。

Since the 1980s，The conceptual research on the issue of moral differences is mainly based on the following aspects: first，The role of faith and attitude in the process of forming moral differences; second，Moral language involved in moral differences、The characteristics of the knowledge of moral defense and moral judgment; third，The solution of moral differences at the epistemology、The boundary and substantial content of moral tolerance。

In order to overcome the limitations of non -recognitionism，The beliefs involved in moral differences people are examined、Attitude、The factors of the intention，In moral realism、Framework of semantics and moral cognition depicts the basis of ethical differences of moral differences，Analysis of linguistic analysis of the concept of "moral differences"，Types and features of moral differences、Compared with the differences between moral differences and other types of cognitive differences，The criteria for.。In the contemporary episodes, the positions of "stubbornness", "discountism" and "overall evidence theory" of cognitive differences in contemporary understanding theory are also used as effectiveness and reliability of specific analysis and moral disagreement。For Bet365 app download example，To what extent can a society be tolerant of homosexual groups instead of thinking that they or she are morally wrong? also，People also analyze the internal connection of rational factors (conviction) and perceptual factor (emotional attitude) in moral differences from the perspective of moral psychology，Different from the level of value at the level of belief，Then evaluate the rationality of the moral judgment of all parties in the differences。

So，We can see，The principle of reasonable moral judgment and moral defense from the perspective of epistemology and moral defense，Fully understand moral cognition for moral beliefs、Effects caused by moral judgment，Only to truly understand the essence of moral differences，and deepen the cognition of moral facts、Enhance the defense of moral beliefs、Maintaining the rationality of moral judgment、Promote the integration of moral attitudes between different values ​​subjects，The moral differences between people between people，Expand the moral consensus of the whole society。

　　Bet365 app download