The creativity of analogy reasoning
December 13, 2023 09:44 Source: "China Social Sciences" December 13, 2023 Issue 2793 Author: Du Shanshan

Analog reasoning is the commonality between one type of two or two types of different things,Release the remaining one or that kind of thing that has the same target attributes from one or one or one type of subject attributes。We generally write the reasoning mode of analogy reasoning as follows: A and B have attributes A1,A2 ... An; A has attribute B。So B also has attribute B。In view of inductive reasoning, "features of premise and conclusions have characteristics or nature",That is "premise,Non -deductive features of conclusions,We generally ask users to pay attention to the following strategies for raising the conclusion of analogy reasoning: first,The more the common attributes of the two or two types of things that are analogy, the better; the second,The common attributes of two or two things that are analogy, the better, the better; the third,The more attributes of two or two types of things in the analogy and the degree of associated with the subject attribute involved in the conclusion are better, the better。The creativity of rational thinking is actually the "new" ability of thinking。From the perspective of logical reasoning,is the ability to launch new conclusions from the old premise。Over the years,The research of people's "new" ability of thinking is only surface,No specific conclusions that can be operated in terms of logical reasoning。I think,Equal reasoning is an excellent logical reasoning mode that improves rational thinking "new" ability。

 bet365 live casino games

Let's first observe the two prerequisites for the analogy reasoning。bet365 live casino games Prerequisite 1: "A and B have attributes A1,A2 ... An。"Prerequisite 2:" A has attribute B。"premise 1 is actually a composite proposition formed by two simple propositions connected by" and "the logical connection words; premise 2 is actually the" full name affirmation proposition "in simple propositions。The way to get a prerequisite is to analyze the A thing first,A proposition of "A has several attributes"; then start from these attributes,Analyze whether things B have the same attribute。From the perspective of rational thinking,This is exactly the dual application of analysis and comprehensive,Logical analysis method commonly known as "comparison"。The purpose of the prerequisite one is to establish such propositions,that is, A and B are very similar things。Next,Leading the attributes of the target B from the prerequisite 2。Final,Create a new concept in the conclusion,That is, B also has attribute B。

Two prerequisites for brief analysis of the class ratio reasoning,Let's analyze the three strategies of reliability of income conclusions to increase the income of analogy inference。The first strategy,You need to find more similar attributes of A and B,to pursue great similarity of A and B。Second strategy,You need to find more essential similar attributes,The purpose is to pursue the great similarities of A and B as much as possible。Third strategy,The degree of correlation between the attribute B of the standard B and those essential similar attributes。The higher the correlation, the better the better,To do this,The operable ways we have proposed are: first,The target attribute B is the essential similar attribute A1,A2 ... An determined,That is, the "B can be A1 in bet365 live casino games their minds when people do reasoning,A2 ... AN "Introduced"。The first step we need to examine is: whether there is a feeling of "can be launched"。This "can be launched" feeling from the perspective of logic is "if A1,A2 ... An,So B "This conditional sentence is true cognition。For example,This conclusion is that "B place is suitable for planting a certain crop","A place can plant this crop" must be the prerequisite 2,At the same time, reasoning needs "suitable for planting this crop" to be "weather、hydrology、Soil、Policy、Manpower "and other essential similar attributes such as" launched "(of course, the premise is" A and B place in the weather、hydrology、Soil、Some attributes such as policies and manpower are the same ")。This conclusion "B place is suitable for planting the crops" will have a certain reliability。

2,Principles of reverse thinking,Actively think about the essential differences of things A and B,and these different and target attributes of the target attributes。If the "release" experience of the "can be launched" of the target attributes is much higher than the "available" feeling of similar attributes and the attributes of the subjective attribute,The conclusions of this type of ratio reasoning cannot be accepted,It is not high for reliability。If the "Release" feeling of the attributes of the subject is similar to the "available" feeling of similar attributes and the subject attributes that is similar to the nature,Then the conclusion of this type of ratio is not accepted,The conclusion does not make。If the "Release" feeling of the "can be launched" of the attributes of the subject is far less than the "available" feeling of similar attributes and the subjectual attributes of the subject,The conclusions of this type of ratio bet365 Play online games can be accepted,High reliability。

 Amendment to analogy reasoning

In order to achieve the greatest concept innovation,The criteria for revising the analogy reasoning are: maximum innovative conclusions and the relative reliability of maintaining conclusions。The "relative reliability" here means that its amendment is mainly based on ideas innovation,To some extent, the reliability of conclusions can be abandoned。The final test of reliability is attributed to practice,using practical results to abandon the wrong innovative concept、Keep the correct innovative concept。Brief words,The correctness of the new concept of "screening" with practice。

The essence of analogy reasoning is that in the premise 1, the great similarity of A and B things in the prerequisite one, so as to smoothly launch "B with the nature of A" B。The conclusion of analogy reasoning has a certain degree of reliability。But,Although its conclusion is innovative,But not big。From the root cause,Analog reasoning is also "analogy" interpretation reasoning,that is, A and B are similar enough,The various special properties they have are the same。Destination reasoning is nothing more than required analogy reasoning to change the premise to its extreme situation -not great similarity but equal,that is "a = b"。The content of the conclusion of interpretation reasoning cannot exceed the premise,The conclusions of inductive reasoning statements exceed the premise。So,The analogy reasoning as an important type of inductive reasoning has a new ability to transcend the deductive reasoning。After careful analysis,This new capability that transcends the deductive reasoning comes from its prerequisites to destroy the form of "a = b",and bet365 live casino games extend it into a proposition such as "A and B have great similarity"。So,To surpass the new ability of existing analogy reasoning,We should imitate the method of "analogy inference beyond interpretation",That is to further destroy the premise of the form of "a = b",The prerequisite for the analogy reasoning to "has certain similarities",instead of "great similarity"。

To do this,The specific correction operation of analogy reasoning is as follows: The first step,Primary ratio reasoning mode can remain unchanged,Still A1 with A and B,A2 ... An。A with attribute B。So,B also has attribute B。Step 2,Three strategies that increase the conclusion of increasing analogy reasoning are as follows: (1) ignore the first one of the original three strategies,No more emphasis on the common attributes of A and B, the better。(2) I neglected the second in the original three strategies,No more emphasis on the common attributes of A and B, the better the better。But emphasizing (3) the more associated degree of the common attributes of A and B, the higher the degree of association B more。In other words,A and B preferably particularly different things,But their common attributes can directly associate the attribute B。From a logical perspective,"If A1,A2 ... An,Then B "The conditional sentence is high。For example,We make the following analogy reasoning: The top materials of human skulls and dome -type buildings are light and thin into skull。A person's skull is strong。So,The top of the dome -type building is also strong。The top of the person's skull and dome building is very different.,They have less common attributes,"Light texture" and "skull" are not their essential attributes。So,The conclusion gets a new concept- "The top of the dome building Bet365 app download is also strong"。This new concept has the typical characteristics of jumping thinking compared to the two premise of the reasoning -the information of carried is far exceeding the two prerequisites。But,These two common attributes are highly associated with "solid" attributes。So,This conclusion is more reliable。We can verify the authenticity of this association through practice。

  Amendments to the analogy reasoning and the "new" ability of rational thinking

The "new" capabilities of the amended analogy reasoning far beyond the "new" ability of the original analogy reasoning。The amendment we have done is just a correction method of imitating the original analog reasoning mode for the deductive reasoning。This correction itself is also a "analog",It is also "correction",It is a unique product of the "new" capabilities of the amended analogy reasoning。After all,Destination reasoning and analogy reasoning are strictly different。

The corrected analogy reasoning emphasizes the analogy between different things,Emphasize "Properties 'Launched' Properties",common attribute "A1,A2 ... An "can launch the attribute" B "。This,We can get a new concept of creating an extraordinary character in the conclusion。Although it seems that this concept is only two new combinations of the two existing concepts of concepts,But the source of this combination is a corrected analogy reasoning,The combination of the concept of building in a certain rational thinking structure。

The author advocates a logical "from thinking mode" to construct new concepts instead of philosophical theory that produces new concepts from the concept of "pondering the concept"。This theory requires people to have a thinking mode first,Construct a new concept in the above content according to the bet365 live casino games thinking mode。Equal reasoning is a very important thinking mode with the ability to "produce new"。As for whether there are more powerful rational thinking patterns that are more powerful than the class reasoning and its amendment can produce new concepts,This is a question worthy of follow -up。

 (Author is an associate professor at the School of Philosophy of Wuhan University)

Editor in charge: Zhang Jing
QR code icon 2.jpg
Key recommendation
The latest article
Graphics
bet365 live casino games

Friendship link:

Website filing number: Jinggong.com Anxie 11010502030146 Ministry of Industry and Information Technology:

All rights reserved by China Social Sciences Magazine shall not be reprinted and used without permission

General Editor Email: zzszbj@126.com This website contact information: 010-85886809 Address: Building 11-12, Building 1, Building, No. 15, Guanghua Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing: 100026