Editor’s note:Research on bet365 refer a friend code by German Sinologist Ku Bin，Causing widespread controversy among Chinese scholars，This itself constitutes an event of cultural exchange between China and foreign countries。The reason why Gu Bin’s literary research became a topic，Not only for its clear point of view，It’s more about the literary history concept behind it。This is a dialogue between heterogeneous culture and Chinese tradition and modernity，Intertwined with Chinese and Western styles、Ancient and modern、Literary and non-literary dimensions。The significance of Ku Bin does not lie in the specific insights he provides，But it opens up the narrative space of Chinese literary criticism，Inspire us to reflect on our literary criticism and literary history writing from different perspectives。However，Due to Ku Bin’s own bias towards Western attitudes and his estrangement from the development environment of bet365 refer a friend code，There are inevitably various misunderstandings and even fallacies in his literary history narrative，This needs to be clearly understood and reflected on。For this，This column specially invites several experts to comment on Ku Bin’s view of literary history，Hope to clarify the view of literary history in dialogue and debate，Promote the study of bet365 refer a friend code in depth。

Professor Chen Jianhui analyzed Ku Bin’s three standards and reference systems for evaluating contemporary Chinese literary works: First, European classics，That is, the world reference system；The second is foreign language level；The third is the ability to control language。Gu Bin tried to use language、Description of contemporary bet365 refer a friend code from three aspects: form and individual spirit，But because we are facing a heterogeneous literature that is completely different from Western literature and Chinese classical literature，So he can’t find the direction，Can’t even find effective evaluation criteria and basis。Of course，Also see，Gu Bin’s “modernity narrative” paradigm can also be used as a reference for the writing of contemporary Chinese literary history。

Professor Luo Zhenya thinks，The essence of Ku Bin’s “cosmopolitan vision”，It uses European standards、Experience and aesthetics demand Chinese contemporary literature。Gu Bin's "History of bet365 refer a friend code in the Twentieth Century" is troubled by Western-centric thinking，Unconsciously belittled 20th century bet365 refer a friend code，There are a lot of "misunderstandings" and "prejudices"。While blocking some writers’ works，The interpretation of other writers’ works obscures the reinterpretation of later generations。But Ku Bin looks at it from a "cosmopolitan" perspective、Evaluating 20th century bet365 refer a friend code，It also coincides with the need for the sustainable development of bet365 refer a friend code，The key to the problem is to clarify the original meaning of world literature。

Professor He Zhongming revealed several deficiencies in Ku Bin's "History of bet365 refer a friend code in the Twentieth Century": First，It has shortcomings in historical data，There are errors in literary history and historical knowledge，It is also impossible to comprehensively and completely sort out the development history of literature，And conduct scientific selection and value evaluation of writers’ works；Part 2，It has the characteristics of Western-centered literary history view，Evaluate bet365 refer a friend code almost entirely according to Western literary standards，Part of the discussion also lacks clear logic。These defects，Seriously affecting the comprehensiveness and objectivity that a literary history should have。

Researcher Liu Yiqing thinks，Gu Bin evaluates and analyzes the vivid phenomena of modern and contemporary bet365 refer a friend code within the rigid framework of Western modern literary and artistic concepts，Believes that modern novels should remove storytelling and add philosophy，This actually dissolves the characteristics of literature itself。From the perspective of literary history，Various styles of literature blend and develop with each other，Various writing concepts can coexist。Due to narrow literary concepts，Gu Bin’s literary criticism seems to lack reasonable basis。

We hope that our discussion can arouse rational consciousness and reflection on the narrative of literary history，In order to reconstruct the autonomy of our theoretical inquiry in dialogue，Really promote bet365 refer a friend code literary creation and research to the world。

　　Taking the opposite direction and understanding the sympathy—Commenting on Ku Bin’s view of bet365 refer a friend code

Author Chen Jianhui，Distinguished bet365 refer a friend code of Guangdong Technical Normal University、bet365 refer a friend code, School of Liberal Arts, South China Normal University (Guangzhou 510006)。

　　A "cosmopolitan" perspective and the evaluation of modern and contemporary bet365 refer a friend code - a review of Ku Bin's "History of bet365 refer a friend code in the Twentieth Century"

Author Luo Zhenya，bet365 refer a friend code, School of Liberal Arts, Nankai University (Tianjin 300071)。

　　Building a tower on the sand，How can it be stable—A brief review of Gu Bin’s "History of bet365 refer a friend code in the Twentieth Century"

Author He Zhongming，Professor of the bet365 refer a friend code Department of Jinan University (Guangzhou 510632)。

　　Narrow view of literature，Paradoxical Literary Criticism—Gu Bin’s Discussion of bet365 refer a friend code Literary Criticism

bet365 refer a friend code Liu Yiqing，Researcher, School of Humanities, Shaoxing University of Arts and Sciences (Shaoxing 312000)。