2020 International Research Development Report
January 18, 2021 11:36 Source: "China Social Sciences" January 18, 2021, Issue 2092, Issue 2092

2020,Facing the global crisis caused by the popularity of new crown pneumonia,Under the guidance of Xi Jinping's diplomatic ideas,Chinese International Relations Stadium Starting Starting from the academic level, Chinese claims are proposed on the era of globalization and Sino -US relations,On the other hand, constantly accumulating strength,Research on the construction of the "Chinese School",Basic theory of discipline、Basic method、Re -thinking about the basic concept,and the field of new research、Re -exploration of the new research path,Promote the innovation and development of China's international relations discipline。

 bet365 live casino games

September 21, 2020,President Xi Jinping's speech at the 75th anniversary of the establishment of the United Nations,The expression of the "post -epidemic era" for the first time。This means,The global new crown pneumonia epidemic in 2020 has become an epoch -making big event。Although how far the consequences are caused by this epidemic,We can't answer immediately,But the globalization and global governance of the "post -epidemic age"、Great Power Relations, especially Sino -US relations,China's international relations community on the basis of previous achievements,constantly revised、Supplement,further deepening research。

First,Globalization and Global Governance Research In -depth。For the United States in recent years to turn unilateralism、Globalization is blocked、Coboism will lift up the wave、The situation of global governance is in trouble,Cheng YawenPointing in "Globalization of Globalization",The globalization of contemporary forms has broken through the political limit when its departure,Therefore, it brings serious political disorder in the international and many countries。Prematures due to the impact of the epidemic of new crown pneumonia,Globalization is no longer likely to continue along the original orbit。Future,Globalization should break the problem from two places,That is to build more equal equality between developing developing countries and developed countries、Capital re -political regulation and globalization that can maintain vitality。Zhang Yuyan,Although the epidemic has exacerbated the trend of adverse globalization,But the choice is still the human own。The game leading the country will largely determine human survival、The degree and direction of development and safety。Although the current situation is looking at,Build a common manner for the fate of human beings,But the epidemic has shown: except for the same march、forward side by side,Human has no other choice。Zhang YunlingI also think,Anti -globalization forces have been accompanied by the forces that boost globalization,But the connection and dependence under the openness is not only contemporary,It is also a basic feature of the future world。Globalization is changing,But not returning to the past,but facing the future。The world will not return to the "Times Times of the Treasure"。At the same time,Scholars re -evaluated the global governance dilemma caused by globalization。Liu ZhenyuProposal,The globalization "melting" caused by the global outbreak of the new crown pneumonia,Accelerated the historical turning point of global development。This historic turning point inevitably exacerbates the dilemma of global governance。For this,Shiben Ye, Ma XiaoliThink,Global governance system urgently needs reform and reconstruction。Including the concept of global governance、subject、Objects, rules and power need to be shaped。

Next,Re -evaluate the relationship between the great power,Especially Sino -US relations。Yang JiemianThink,The world has faced a major change in a century,Great Kingdom is re -defining its position in the international system in accordance with the comprehensive national strength,and determine its strategic goals in global affairs and international relations。Compared with the changes in the international system since the Geography Discovery,At present, the comparison situation of the western country can no longer be able to control the international power,Development of large powers in the group is in the ascendant,Peace、Development、Cooperation、The trend of the win -win era is unstoppable。but,The expansion or replacement of the dominant country of the system will be a long -term and twisting process。Hegemony and traditional powers will not easily share dominance with the development of great powers,Establishing fair and justice international order and the process of global governance system will be full of changes、Volume、Fighting and running -in。Specific Sino -US relations,Zheng YongnianThink,China and the United States have entered the "New Cold War",and the new crown pneumonia's epidemic will further upgrade the "Cold War" status。butZhao KejinThink,"New Cold War Theory" is not established,The US strategic framework for the United States is still in dispute。Wang XisiI also think,Just persist in three bottom lines,Instead of handling differences with peaceful ways,Maintain a certain scale of economic and trade cooperation、Maintain financial stability,Maintain Chinese and American cultural exchanges and social exchanges,Sino -US relations return to the right track is just one time and opportunity。For the "Xiu Cat Daxide Trap" proposed by American scholars before,Scholars generally think,As an academic concept,"Xiu Xi Dade Trap" does have its explanation,From the original intention of Elison's proposal to this concept,It is also intended to control differences and conflicts,Avoid trap。So,cannot be simply denied or rejected this concept。Some scholars pointed out,The key factor of being caught in the "Xiu Xidde Trap" is whether the United States really feels afraid of China's strength growth。From the current point of view,The overall US foreign policy of the United States is based on "fragmentation" and "chasing risk benefits" as the main feature,This means that the "Xiu Xidde Trap" may not be triggered in bilateral relations。Based on this,On the one hand,No need to exaggerate the US policy of China,Fierce economic and trade friction does not necessarily slide to the "New Cold War"; on the other hand,,Sino -US relations still have great uncertainty,If you continue to interact improperly,May more destructive results。Generally speaking,Scholars are still positive and optimistic about the return of Sino -US relations。Cultivation of the first machine in the crisis、Open a new game in the change bureau,It is the overall expectation of the current international situation and Chinese diplomacy in China.。

  2、Xi Jinping's diplomatic ideas to promote international relations "Chinese school" knowledge system again

2019 is the 100th anniversary of the establishment of international relations。2020,Related discussions will continue to deepen in the "Chinese school" direction of international relations。Chinese scholars recognize more deeply,Facing the current development trend of the adjustment of the current discipline of global international relations,Use Chinese practice、Construction of China International Relations Theory,Knowledge system that embeds the internal and global international relations,It is both a major mission and an important opportunity for both China's international relations.。Xi Jinping's diplomatic thought as a concentrated manifestation of Chinese wisdom in the field of international relations,Basic follow and theoretical guidelines for becoming a theoretical knowledge system in China。

  Sun Zhiwei, Guo ShuyongProposal,Xi Jinping ’s diplomatic idea follows the historical law of the development of international relations,Reasonable view of the value of value behind the theory of traditional international relations,Adhering to the development of Marxist international relations theory,A consistent land uses the Chinese road as its theoretical background,Historically transcendence of traditional international relations theory,Directly instructed the practical process of diplomacy of socialist powers with Chinese characteristics,Existing the theory of international politics。and this transcendence is specifically manifested as: in terms of understanding of national interests,Elimination of the selfish statement of the sovereign state that has surpassed the theory of traditional international relations,Respect the rights of the country seeking their own development,More emphasis on the country should adhere to the correct concept of "morality" in the international community; in terms of understanding of international order,Break through the existing mode led by developed western countries,Prerequisites to recognize world diversity and sovereign countries,Promoting the process of multilateralism,Promote the construction of new international relations; in terms of understanding of national cooperation,Discard the understanding of zero sum of traditional international relations theory,Proposal beyond ideological differences,Multilateral cooperation in real sense,Create a new model of international cooperation with the "Belt and Road" construction;,Proposal to build sharing,Promote greater extent to promote countries around the world、Deeper fusion,firmly respond to the issue of "safety dilemma" with the concept of the community of human destiny; in the understanding of global governance,Dialogue without confrontation、Society without alliance replacing alliances,It advocates the construction of a new pattern of international cooperation with win -win cooperation and global governance。

  Wu Zhicheng, Xu Jianand other scholars also pointed out,Xi Jinping's diplomatic thought in response to the new historical position of China's development、There is no major change in the world for a century、Historical changes in the relationship between China and the world's relationships,Drawing the grand blueprint of diplomacy with a large country with Chinese characteristics in the new era,Not only the fundamental follow and action guidelines for the innovation and development of China's foreign work in the new era,and concentratedly reflect the latest ideological and theoretical achievements of contemporary Chinese Marxism in the field of diplomacy and international relations。Xi Jinping's diplomatic thought is not only an organic component part of the theory of international relations with Chinese characteristics in the world,It is the basic guidance idea of ​​the construction of the knowledge system。

Actually,The generation of international relations "Chinese School" has never been the result of simply the construction of simply knowledge logic。such asQin YaqingWords,As a part of global international relations,The theory of China International Relations is the nourishment of traditional history and culture in China、Enlightenment,Use China’s ideological resources,Conceptification of the substantial content of international relations、Abstract and generalization treatment,The logical self -consistent ideological system formed。Based on this,China's international relations academia urgently needs to improve the ability to transform China's international relations and ideas into new theories; China's international relations theory is based on the existing "Chinese school" innovation,Urgently need to be in response to the historical pulse of the unrealistic change in the century and the development practice of China in this historical interchange,Make a new round of theoretical construction。Yan Shuangwuand other scholars explicitly proposed,Systematic interpretation of China's development laws in accordance with international academic norms,is to promote multiple symbiosis、The important direction of the theoretical research of international relations with win -win cooperation and common development of cooperation。China's international relations academia should closely follow the logic main line of cooperative and orderly competition,Construction of two major reality themes around the construction of new international relations and the community of human destiny、Objectives to promote the interaction of domestic governance and international governance system,Knowledge System of Re -plasticizing International Relations Discipline。

 Three, the review of reflection and method defects of concept innovation

Methods and concepts on the study of international relations have always been discussed。The most prominent feature of 2020 is the conceptual reflection and method review。

For the concept innovation in the theory of international relations in China in recent years,Yin JiwuSummarized five basic paths,Including concept innovation based on universal facts、Innovation of concept based on special facts、Reconstruction concept of mainstream international relations、Drawing and introducing traditional Chinese concepts,and concept innovation based on causal explanations。But the author proposes at the same time,In the sense of methodology,Concept innovation must follow the basic logic,Its purpose is to achieve better theoretical functions,While considering the uniqueness,It is also necessary to take into account the general applicability。other,Scholars also examine the concept of close contact with Chinese diplomatic practice。such asDai Zheng, Zheng XianwuThrough the study of the alliance,,As a means of external checks and balances,Alliance is often a common way for national behavior to gain a sense of security,But the thinking mode of alliance politics is unreasonable with the philosophical concept of "enemy friend theory",Politics distinguished by the enemy and me cannot fundamentally unable to lead humans to the predicament of conflict。Based on this,China's "Partnership" and "Community of Human Destiny" proposed in China new diplomatic initiative framework,provided a replacement path for reference for national security。Trust proposed by President Xi Jinping is the best adhesive in international relations,Some scholars conducted academic exploration。They think,Due to the upgrading of international competition friction in recent years and the intensification of geopolitical game colors,Trust deficit in the international community is increasingly significant。So,The connotation of the concept of "trust" should be recognized from the two major directions of "cognitive type" and "emotion"。To effectively solve the trust deficit problem in the current international relations,It should be compensated by dual -dimensional cognition and emotion。

Methods in the study of international relations,Feng YujunProposal,Many chaos in China ’s international issues are largely caused by lack of methodology or errors。To improve the level of China's international issues integrated,and make it effectively serving the cause of the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation,It is necessary to get out of the thought misunderstanding,Establish composite thinking,Get rid of all kinds of "pseudo -proposition",Realize "History Return",Putting real problems in the long river of historical development is inspected,instead of being stubborn in a moment。Wang Lixindiscovered from the comparison of history and international relations,The main reason for the failure of international relations prediction is to adopt the method of thinking about treating the complicated international political reality, which is highly simplified and abstract,The scientific nature of the study of international relations and ignore humanity,Excessive emphasis on the regularity and inevitability of international relations。Wang ZhengdaI also summarized the four major defects of copying natural scientific research methods。The first is the defect of the theoretical construction method,The main manifestation in the definition of concept、Logic chain construction、Assuming agreement、The theoretical test and interpretation of the theory are five aspects: the limitation of the theory; the second is the defect of the case selection,The main manifestation is selective use case、The historical experience reflected by the lack of clear explanation and case reflection of the case is too narrow; the third is the limitations of experimental methods and statistical methods; the fourth is that the fake method is not applicable to the study of international relations as a social science。Echo the review of prediction,Tang Shiping, Wang ZhongyuanFour types of paradigms of scientific election prediction: Opinion aggregation paradigm、Model Formula、Mixed paradigm and big data paradigm。They think,Each type of paradigm contains several prediction methods and has its own advantages,The choice of prediction method is based on the comprehensive weighing of prediction goals and application scenarios。During the US election,Tang Shipingand its team launched a prediction based on the winning rate of universal election,Get a good prediction result。

 4、Politics of international issues、New Exploration of History and Aesthetic Path

International relations are a cross -disciplinary discipline,This has become a consensus。Except the guiding role of Marxism is increasingly prominent in the research of international relations,The status of international political economy continues to improve in the research of international relations,The field survey path of sociology is increasingly valued in regional and country research,Traditional political science、History path because of new exploration,It is increasingly achieving new breakthroughs,And aesthetic path also at the beginning of the research of international relations。

First,Breakthrough of political science path。Thinking about the use of world political research and even alternative international relations research was further demonstrated in 2020。2018Wang XisiIn the book "The Ultimate Value of World Politics"。Echo it with it,The School of International Relations of Renmin University of China in 2019 founded the "World Political Research" album。2020Yang GuangbinPublished further posts,The international relations of international relations in China and the world are seeking innovation and breakthroughs of international relations theory。Since it is "innovation" and "breakthrough",It can not be repaired in the existing international relations theoretical framework,Otherwise, it is impossible to form a unique theoretical system or "school"。To achieve the theoretical innovation,First of all, you need to propose a new research agenda。"World Politics" is a new research agenda。Different explorations with world political ideas,There are also scholars who try to get out of the constraints of politics for international relations。Shanghui Pengthen proposed a theory of international relations that adapt to the era of the world's strong connection,From a single international political entity to a more diverse and closer to the facts of the international relations。Needless doubt,Political path paths are irreplaceable in the study of international relations,But what kind of road choose in the big framework of political science,Still controversy。

Second,The return of the historical path。The return of the historical path is a question that has been highly debated by international relations in recent years。2020 "History Collection", two groups of "historical paths of international relations research" in the fourth and fifth issues of "History Collection",Push the discussion to in -depth。Where,Liu DebinInvolved in "History of Contemporary International Relations and Revisibility of Concept",Jump out of European centralism、Break free of "Westparia Beams" 桎梏,Extend the perspective of theoretical research to the category of the European nation -state,It is of great significance for the innovation of international relations theory。The reshaping of the concept of community may become the base point for theoretical reshaping。Also worthy of attention is the topic of "History of History" in the 9th issue of "History of International Relationships" in the 9th issue of 2020。other,The construction and development of Oriental Diplomacy History also brings more theoretical support to the historical path of international relations。inChen FenglinUnder the active promotion of scholars,"Oriental Diplomacy History" has gradually developed from a concept to a subject system。Current,More and more international relations scholars try to start from Oriental diplomatic practice,To better realize the modern conversion of traditional Chinese culture in the theory of international relations。Zhu XiaoluoThe article "Research on the Origin of China" may be regarded as the latest exploration under this large framework。The article knows the re -understanding of Chinese diplomacy from the activities of the vassal states during the Spring and Autumn Period,Not only found a logical basis for the theory of diplomatic theory with Chinese characteristics and its thoughts, "Shu Gu", and "Discussing Gu Gu",and laid the theoretical foundation for the modern transformation of traditional Chinese culture in Chinese diplomatic theory。

Third, attempt to aesthetic path. likeWang Yizhoucriticized,Chinese International Relations Research Lack of Acting Dialogue with Different Knowledge,Disciplinary exploration lack of humanistic and artistic orientation。andYan ZhanyuThe Art Tropic of International Relations Research: Connotation、Significance and its limits ",Make useful attempts for the expansion of Chinese international relations research on the expansion of the aesthetic orientation。Article proposal,Artistic steering is a further exploration based on the "international political theory aesthetic steering"。Art steering is based on relational aesthetics as the basis of epistemology,Analyze international relations through a balanced inspection of the aesthetic characteristics and historical and social context。Of course,The author also noticed,Art shifts are facing fuzzy research clues、Unclear restrictions in the direction of knowledge progress。But overall,This research has been related to the previous music、Film and other specific art door categories abstract,Or can be regarded as a physical practice of multi -dimensional development of China's international relations。

 Five, the latest development of regional countries and international development

2020,In addition to reflection on basic theoretical issues and breakthroughs in traditional academic paths,China International Relations Discipline also further expands the field of traditional research,and bred some new research fields。

First, regional and country research。With the comprehensive development of the "Belt and Road" construction,Regional and national research has become a new growth point for China International Relations。Compared with the past actively promoting,Related research in 2020 has a little more reflection flavor。Qian Cheng DanPosted by the appeal to the construction of areas with Chinese characteristics and national research,But he pointed out at the same time,Regional and national research provides a wide and solid knowledge support for international relations research,But if the area and the country's research are equivalent to the "international relations research",The scope of "regional and country research" greatly reduces the scope of "regional and country research"。Zhang YunIn the article "Regional State in International Relations: Practice Steering and Discipline Entry Road", it is also proposed,Regional countries are conducive to international relations theory and practice、docking of academic and policy,It can provide new impetus for the development of international relations disciplines in the practical sense。Future development around regional and country research,The academic community has also established an independent region and the voices of the country,But is it established or developed a new discipline,Still in dispute。

Followed by international development research。International Development Research is a research field formed under the leadership of the United States after World War II。At present, more than 100 influential universities in the world have set up major international development research major,A large number of academic groups and practitioners with common research specifications and value orientation。They continue to create discourse、Set the topic,Shape the environment of international development practice。In a sense,,International development research has become an independent learning。Due to international development and assistance, there are many heavy coincidences,The focus of the previous domestic scholars is more concentrated in assistance。But with the completion of the transformation from the recipient to the aid country,China urgently needs to Bet365 lotto review re -examine its international practice from the perspective of international development。Xu Xiuli, Li XiaoyunIn the article "Development Knowledge: The Invisible Cancer in the Formation and Reshape",Facing China、India and other non -Western regions and countries' development experience,The actual explanation of traditional development theory is becoming increasingly decreased。Various new type of international development cooperation mechanism also lacks narrative guidance and theoretical support with international communication and influence。In this background,China urgently needs to explore new alternative narrative frameworks to grasp this major global transformation process。For this,Xu JialiTake World Bank as an example,Proposal "Knowledge Sharing" is the main body of international development participation through production、Effective knowledge and experience of spreading and promoting and application to promote development,is the third largest international development pillar after economic and technical assistance。Facing the severe global governance situation,"Knowledge Sharing" is opening a new direction for international development、Provide new way out。With China's more participation and practice in international development,International development research may become the theoretical growth point of international relations research。

Finally, discussions on "peripheral learning" and "United Nations"。It should be said,Peripheral research and United Nations research are all traditional research fields of international relations,But with the changes in China's international status in recent years,"Surrounding" and "United Nations" have rejuvenated new meaning。Based on this,The voices of establishing a new discipline will appear。"Study around China" isShiyuanhuaA concept proposed in 2018。In 2020, he again stated in a special article launched by International Observation,The proposal of new concepts around China and the construction of new disciplines are the demand and product of the construction of modern socialist power in the new era。Study on the surrounding China from the perspective of discipline construction,It helps to change the current situation of surrounding surrounding research lag and fragmentation。Zhang GuihongAlso proposed,Based on the international status of the United Nations and its significance to Chinese diplomacy,It is necessary to establish "United Nations Studies"。But it is similar to the discussion of the establishment of the area and the country.,Such a method may stay more at the ideological level,Specific research still needs to be further expanded in the dispute。Take peripheral learning as an example,Liu XuelianProposed in the contention article,Constructing the academic surrounding Chinese must first clarify it with Chinese frontier studies、The theoretical boundary of the discipline and other disciplines of the region and the country。

  6. Evaluation and prospect

2020,China International Relations Research is in Marxism,Especially the excavation of the original contribution of Marxism in the 21st century,and the excellent academic tradition of inheriting and promoting the long history of the Chinese nation can be remarkable。

First of all, the excavation of the theory of Marxist international relations。Zhang Xiaobo, Liu ShiqiangThink,In the international relations discipline led by Western discourse,Marxist international relations theory has long been underestimated and marginalized。Actually,In the main research areas and issues of international relations,Marxist international relations theory has rich theoretical innovation and practical value。It deeply criticizes the mainstream theory of Western international relations,and directly affect the rise of international relations critical theory,thus promoted the diversified development of international relations disciplines。Diplomacy of New China,Especially since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, General Secretary Xi Jinping proposed to promote the establishment of diplomatic ideas such as the community of human destiny and new international relations,It is a new development of the theory of international relations in Marxist.,I made important contributions to the progress of international political civilization,Is a transcendence of the mainstream theory of the West。Followed by the modern conversion of traditional Chinese culture in the theory of international relations。For example,Pan ZhongqiDiscovery from the comparison of the "potential" and Western international relations theory of traditional Chinese culture,As a concept of international relations in China,"potential" is extremely Chinese characteristics,Reflected the Chinese people’s strategic thinking,It has important guidance value for understanding contemporary international politics and Chinese diplomacy,and to a certain extent can make up for the lack of existing theory of Western international relations。Persist in guiding Marxism,Digging Chinese tradition,Summary Chinese experience,Construction of international relations theory departing from China,It is always the foundation and starting point for the advancement of China's international relations.。Only this,The development of China International Relations Discipline can truly live up to our great era。

Should be seen,Frequently from the current international emergencies、Reality of the sharp increase in uncertainty,2020 China International Relations Studies are still inadequate in the following aspects。

First,For globalization、Global Governance、The research and judgment of the "general trend" or rough lines of the relationship between the relationship between the great power,Lack of perspective is more ambitious、The results of more delicate arguments。The exploration of this era topic itself will definitely be a cross -disciplinary、System engineering for cross -research。This also requires international relations research to break through the restraint of disciplines,Consciously placed in the background of the development of philosophy and social sciences,System inspection every possible variable。such asYang XuedongWords,The current globalization process has entered a turbulent and twisted platform period,Consensus rupture of major global issues between major powers,Global value serious deficit,Need to build a more inclusive global value concept to bridge the dispute。Value conflict and reconstruction of globalization,Unexpected need to invest more attention。Followed by the basic method of discipline、The controversy of the basic concept needs to be deepened,Relevant interdisciplinary、The appeal of cross -study needs to be "landed" in the research,For artificial intelligence、New technologies such as big data on the influence of disciplines still need to be increased。such asYu XiaofengWords,International Relations Discipline is a specific "knowledge field" and academic platform,It not only has multiple binary complexability,and the space -time complex associated with "front and back"。Studying the development of international relations disciplines requires both disciplines related to "left and right",It is also necessary to inspect the development of disciplines and examine the discipline miscellaneous in the future through the use of "value time and space".,Especially the "net" ballization of the new scientific and technological revolution will lead to,It has constructed new space -time coordinates and disciplines for "post -human international relations"。

Generally speaking,2020,China International Relations Discipline is not responsible for the times,I made due efforts。Looking forward to the "post -epidemic era" Chinese international relations community with greater patience and determination,Moving forward,Sticking more and better works。

(writing: Zhang Ping)

Editor in charge: Cui Cen
QR code icons 2.jpg
Key recommendation
The latest article
Graphics
bet365 live casino games

Friendship link: Official website of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences |

Website filing number: Jinggong.com Anmi 11010502030146 Ministry of Industry and Information Technology: Beijing ICP No. 11013869

All rights reserved by China Social Sciences Magazine shall not be reprinted and used without permission

General Editor Email: zzszbj@126.com This website Contact information: 010-85886809 Address: 11-12, Building 1, Building 1, No. 15, Guanghua Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing: 100026