Recently，Guntram B. Wolff, Director of the Belgian Institute of International Economics, Belgium、Senior researcher Mario Mariniello and research assistant Lionel Jeanrenaud published a "What Do Vaccination Passports Mean For for the vaccine passport for Europe" entitled "What does vaccine passport?" Europe?) Article。Putting on the article，"Vaccine Passport" proposal can be accepted，Depending on whether the distribution of the timetable of the vaccination timetable can be recognized。

　　bet365 best casino games

　　Wolf and other researchers think，In the current current of the prevention and control of the new crown pneumonia，Travel restrictions from EU countries、Self -isolation and new crown detection requirements，The concept of the boundary suddenly reappeared within the EU，This highlights the importance of the person's freedom to flow.。The European Union Treaty and Schengen Agreement stipulate and ensure a basic principle of EU citizenship -allowing the border inspection due to hygiene reasons。Obviously，certain restrictions on freedom of action and strict control within the country，All are effective means to control the spread of new crown pneumonia，These policies are reasonable and necessary: ​​because everyone may become the transmitter of the virus，Therefore, it brings to others that may be unbridled，The negative externality defined in the economic academic term。

Organizational work of vaccine and large -scale vaccination is not only a key factor in the EU's future economic recovery，It is also whether the EU is capable of improving personnel liquidity、Keep key factors that relax the restrictions between the country and the state。So far，The promotion of the new crown pneumonia vaccine in the EU is still very slow，Europe may not be able to promote vaccine until mid -2021。Wolf and other researchers said，Their article aims to explore to what extent to.。

Article thinks，One problem that needs to be explored at present is，Whether a person who has been vaccinated with new coronary pneumonia is still likely to infect the virus。Although there is no conclusion on the research on this problem，But it can be assumed，Injecting vaccine can reduce negative externality to a certain extent: those who have vaccinated new crown pneumonia vaccines will be unlikely to spread the new crown virus。Where to assume，There seems to be no reason to continue to restrict the basic right of vaccine vaccination。Individuals who have vaccinated the vaccine are not contagious，How to ask him or she accepts isolation after bet365 best casino games traveling abroad? therefore，Including the European Union，More and more countries are considering whether to introduce the so -called "vaccine passport"，This will make it easier for their holders to get some outbound convenience including travel，Reduce the negative effects caused by the epidemic。Inside the European Union，Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis is a firm supporter of the "vaccine passport" solution，He called for the establishment of a common "EU Standard"，to make the internal travel within the European Union easier。Ursula

Von der Leyen) also expressed her support for promoting vaccination certificate，But I did not make a statement of travel restrictions on whether individuals can only rely on this certificate。other，Danish、Cyprus、Poland、Belgium、Estonia and Spain have expressed support for the "vaccine passport" proposal。

　　EU "Vaccine Passport" solution is facing resistance

Despite this，The implementation of "Vaccine Passport" also faces a certain resistance。For example，Under the dual effects of public opinion and legal barriers，France quickly rejected this idea。Some legal experts think，As long as the vaccine cannot really popularize to everyone，The limited openness of certain services will be discriminatory。other，Promoting the "vaccine passport" must also make clear exemptions to individuals who cannot vaccine (such as pregnant women or potential bet365 live casino games serious allergic reactions)。but but，From the perspective of Wolf and others，These legal problems are not insurmountable obstacles。Many European countries have implemented a certain form of compulsory vaccination plan for multiple diseases，As a condition for getting some public services。In recent years，France and Italy have expanded the number of forced vaccinations。2020，In order to curb the new round of outbreaks of the measles epidemic，Germany also added the ranks of mandatory vaccination countries。

Wolf and others pointed out，The most powerful opposition to the "vaccine passport" is that this measure may adversely affect social cohesion。As long as the vaccine has not yet fully popularized，"Vaccine Passport" may be considered unfair。European countries can restrict the enrollment of children who have not inoculated measles vaccine，It is because the measles vaccine is quite common。So，Whether to lift the limit of personal rights who take the lead in vaccination，Depending on whether the distribution of the vaccine vaccination timetable is accepted。For example，Indonesia's vaccination strategy is given priority to the population of the working age (it is said that there is no vaccine test for the elderly)，I have caused some criticism of criticism。Similar things also happened in Europe。It is reported，Suggestion of local managers in Italy，More vaccine Bet365 app download shares should be obtained to promote economic recovery，Treating a strong protest。Article representation，According to the experience model，Perhaps the vaccine should be vaccinated first.。

In the EU，State competent authority is responsible for formulating priority policies for vaccination。Article thinks，If the public recognizes that these policies are fair，It is possible to relax the requirements for the control of the vaccine for vaccine，Temporarily maintain restrictions on other people。The opinion of the refutation may be，In EU countries，The disadvantaged group did not be treated fairly。Although the European Commission has purchased vaccines through a central plan，But the distribution of vaccines from the EU countries is based on per capita，Ignoring the difference in the country's age structure。For example，If the national population is the basis for allocation，Italy will account for 13.51%of the vaccine purchased by the European Commission.。But if it is allocated by the country's population over 65 years of age (one of the high -risk factors of the new crown virus) accounted for the population of the EU 65 years old，This number will become 15.2%。At the same time，Countries such as the age structure of young population like Poland，Maintaining the existing allocation scheme is more favorable。Assuming the "vaccine passport" Bet365 app download becomes realistic and Poland's vaccination rate of vaccine in Poland and Italy is similar，The young Polish citizens will give priority to getting a chance to travel。

This problem is more prominent on the global level。Rich countries can already implement the vaccination plan earlier than poor countries，The correlation between higher per capita domestic product and higher number of vaccines will be enhanced in the next few months。Global Aviation Travel depends on whether passengers hold vaccination vouchers? Whether a wealthy country will only allow people who have vaccinated vaccines to enter the country，Eliminates the people of poor countries?

Wolf and others think，The above questions are difficult to answer。Eliminates the people of poor countries?，You can cancel the restrictions on travel。To ensure social recognition，The distribution of vaccines should be based on public opinion support。Wolf and others emphasized，Decision on allocation is extremely important，Because related decisions are related to people's life safety and social acceptance。