The relationship between individuals and bet365 mobile betting has always been an important issue in the history of human civilization，Moral reflections on this issue，The birth of individualism and collectivism。Since the 1960s and 1970s，The ideas of Western individualism and collectivism show an internal consistent development trend: both individualism and collectivism place the theoretical foothold on the realization of personal freedom。However，In recent years, this assertion of personal freedom has gradually exposed its inherent flaws in the face of complex changes in the times，This prompts us to return to Marx and Adorno to rethink this issue。

　　Individual freedom and bet365 mobile betting development are unified

Marx regards people as social beings，That is, people are practical individuals in historical reality。This means that human nature is not rigid and fixed，But it is constantly unfolding and developing in practical activities。Practice is not just a link to achieve the unity of subject and object，Here in Marx，It is more manifested as a specific social relationship structure based on differences in division of labor at different stages of historical development。Based on this social relationship structure，Marx pointed out that human beings are social beings，Then understand bet365 mobile betting as the mutual relationships formed by realistic and concrete individuals in production activities。After Marx analyzed the production relations of pre-capitalist bet365 mobile betting and capitalist bet365 mobile betting，Discover that bet365 mobile betting, on the one hand, is the mutual interaction between individuals based on division of labor，On the other hand, it is the "universal things" produced by individuals in the process of interacting with each other。This “universal thing” is the “bet365 mobile betting” that represents universal interests，So bet365 mobile betting is also understood as totality。

But，Marx discovered after analyzing capitalism and the era before it，Personal interests and the general interests of bet365 mobile betting are always antagonistic。Especially the internal structure of capitalist bet365 mobile betting manifests itself as a logic of capital，The logic of capital is based on the production of commodities、Exchange etc. are representations，But behind this appearance is exploitation and oppression，And capital’s dominance and coercion of the entire bet365 mobile betting。In a nutshell，The logic of capital leads to the alienation of capitalist bet365 mobile betting，This leads to the alienation of the relationship between individuals and bet365 mobile betting。

Therefore，Marx emphasized that there is a negative relationship between individuals and bet365 mobile betting in capitalist bet365 mobile betting。On the one hand，Freedom under capital relations is always limited，An individual’s life and self-state are limited by the material production conditions in which he lives。On the other hand，Negation is the inevitable condition for personal freedom，Only by negating the alienated capitalist production relations can the individual break the opposition between the individual and bet365 mobile betting。Marx elucidated the relationship between the individual and bet365 mobile betting through the dialectics of "negativity": the individual and bet365 mobile betting are always entangled，Cannot be separated。At the same time，The realization of personal freedom needs to be based on the negation of unreasonable social relations。It needs to be pointed out，This kind of freedom cannot be achieved by individuals alone，It is achieved by "united individuals" relying on developed productivity and realistic practical activities。This kind of realistic practical activity means the revolutionary negation of capitalist social production relations and the construction of new social production relations。So，Marx believed that the issue of individual freedom is essentially a social issue。

　　People and bet365 mobile betting are in intermediary

　　　　，Some scholars interpret Adorno’s thought as post-Marxism or post-modernism，This further separates the intrinsic connection between Adorno and Marx’s thoughts。From the perspective of the relationship between individuals and bet365 mobile betting，We found that this subjective separation does not hold true。Adorno was influenced by Marx，Understand bet365 mobile betting as a total existence，And understand the internal structure of capitalist bet365 mobile betting in terms of commodity exchange and other dimensions。At the same time，Adorno believes that people are social beings，People do some involuntary things to satisfy their own survival needs，These are the result of the restrictions imposed by bet365 mobile betting and nature on people。This kind of restriction makes people feel pain，And try to get rid of this restriction，Then people become the subject。Specifically，Adorno inherited and developed Marx’s thoughts from the following aspects on the relationship between man and bet365 mobile betting。

First，Inheritance and development of research methods。Adorno follows Marx’s approach to negativity and identity in Capital，Proposed a speculative method of identity and non-identity。The relationship between an individual and bet365 mobile betting is not an identity relationship，It is a non-identical relationship in which each other respects each other’s differences。Second，Inheritance and development of research stance。Adorno further analyzed the relationship between theory and practice in Marx's thought in "Marginal Notes on Theory and Practice"，Point out that theory does not refer to subject，Practice does not refer to objects。In the relationship between people and bet365 mobile betting，Adorno thinks，bet365 mobile betting does not only mean the object that is practiced，Because treating bet365 mobile betting as a practical object means having a mentality of belittling and conquering bet365 mobile betting。This kind of psychology is caused by the principle of supremacy of reason promoted by the Enlightenment，Because this principle will lead to the neglect of the objective content of bet365 mobile betting，Therefore Adorno proposed the principle of "object priority"，Emphasize that the relationship between people and bet365 mobile betting is not a relationship between practice and being practiced, but a relationship of "mediation" for each other。Third，Inheritance and development of research content。Whether it is Marx or Adorno，Both criticize the internal structure of capitalist bet365 mobile betting。Marx in the period of liberal capitalism，Criticism of the internal structure of capitalist bet365 mobile betting mainly points to the material means of production and means of living，And the alienated labor that people have to engage in to meet their survival needs。It needs to be pointed out，Because in Marx’s era，He focuses on the control of nature by rational logic，Thus it does not go further into the rational metaphysics of capitalism and the corresponding awareness、Culture、Criticism of art, etc.。Adorno pointed his criticism at the spiritual level and cultural field represented by reason。In Adorno’s view，Capitalism in its mature stage controls people not only in terms of material means of living，Also in spirit、Psychology、Ideology and other aspects。Therefore，Adorno’s criticism of the internal structure of capitalist bet365 mobile betting mainly focuses on the criticism of the “culture industry”。

On the basis of criticizing capitalist bet365 mobile betting，Adorno believes that there is an "intermediary" relationship between individuals and bet365 mobile betting。Adorno’s dialectical thought based on “mediation” breaks out of the traditional logic of identity，Rising to a non-identity logic。Because of the thing itself and the subject of knowledge、bet365 mobile betting and individuals are not identical，bet365 mobile betting as a non-identical thing is not directly unified by the subject through practice，It is not the so-called unity obtained by negating bet365 mobile betting through the dialectics of negation of negation，But to obtain the unity of the two through an intermediary。In Adorno’s view，Although the object can only be thought through the subject，But it is always something relative to the subject、Something different from the subject；The subject is by its nature an object first and foremost。We cannot imagine a subject that is not an object，But it is possible to imagine an object that is not a subject。The subject is also an object，This is part of the meaning of subjectivity，But the meaning of the object does not include it becoming a subject。Although the object can only reveal itself through the subject，But after all, it is an existence external to the subject，Therefore, it is necessary to use an intermediary to connect the subject and the object、Connecting individuals and bet365 mobile betting。

Therefore，Adorno pointed out that both individuals and bet365 mobile betting are intermediary entities，The two cannot be directly unified。The direct unity of individual and bet365 mobile betting is only a subjective theoretical assumption in Adorno's view。Adorno thinks，Both individuals and bet365 mobile betting are mediated，Instead of a completely independent existence。The individual cannot exist independently of bet365 mobile betting，bet365 mobile betting cannot exist independently of individuals。bet365 mobile betting is not a ready-made entity，It is a bet365 mobile betting mediated by individuals；Individuals are not independent entities，But an individual who is mediated by bet365 mobile betting。In other words，Only in mutual intermediary relationship，Individuals and bet365 mobile betting can become themselves。Therefore，The unity of individual and bet365 mobile betting is only possible in this mutual intermediary relationship。

What needs to be pointed out is，Adorno in the process of developing Marx’s thought，Some views are contrary to Marx。Marx believed that human beings have the power to change the world through practice，And use proletarian practice to solve the ills of capitalist bet365 mobile betting，Furthermore, it is believed that the proletariat will eventually master the power of reason，Thus eliminating the barbarism of capitalist bet365 mobile betting。Adorno is critical of the spirit of enlightenment，Therefore, we cannot see the progressive power of the proletariat and the prospects for the progress of human bet365 mobile betting，Thus falling into pessimism。Precisely because we cannot see the progressive power of the proletariat and are disappointed with social reality，Making his theory not directly facing the real world，Only for the identity thinking of traditional philosophy，Proposed a non-identical cultural criticism method。So Adorno is just explaining the world，But failed to change social reality。

　　(This article is a phased result bet365 mobile betting project "Research on the Moral Foundation of Modern Politics and Contemporary Western Normative Political Ethical Thoughts" (20QT003) funded by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities)

(Author’s unit: School of Philosophy, Faculty of Marxism, Northeast Normal University)