Knowledge、Science and practice is the three levels of relationship between people and world，It is also the basis and motivation of research and development of Marxist philosophy。Marxist philosophy is the essence of the spirit of the times，The spirit of contemporary times is deeply contained in contemporary knowledge、In science and practice。Surrounding knowledge generation、Social epistemology of scientific practice research not only effectively promotes the combination of Marxist philosophy and real life，It also strongly guides the research on the knowledge policy of contemporary people。Wish to know，Since the horn of the concept of the theory of the episodes of Perxa，The theory of epistemology has become the oldest castle in the field of philosophy，During more than 300 years，Master gathering，There are many genres，Perspectives are present，This has caused the combing of the theory and the purpose of the theory and the development of the development.，Quite deep philosophical skills and academic patience，In terms of the development of the 20th century, it has gone through empiricalism、Interpremism、Criticism、Experimentalism, etc.，The perspective between these genres and the academic contention built a beautiful stage for the development of the philosophy of the 20th century, especially the development of epistemology,bet365 best casino games 。From naturalization understanding to the transformation of social epistemology, it has contributed to the transformation of epistemology to knowledge theory，In the era of science，Knowledge has become an institutional product，From this，The perspective of the discussion has surpassed the general knowledge range，Entering the field of scientific policy research in knowledge，The policy dimension of social epistemology has begun to become an important research content and began to become eye -catching。

The birth of social epistemology，It can be regarded as a new challenge for the academic world。How to treat and evaluate such a social epistemology objectively? How to build the theoretical framework and the selection of many materials，Reasonably organize the evolution of epistemology from narrow spectrum to broad -spectrum? I have stubbornly thought，From the mid -17th century to the mid -19th century，Traditional epistemology has not achieved much achievements，From the late 19th century to the mid -20th century, with knowledge sociology、Development of scientific sociology，Some new social elements have gradually penetrated into the existing academic field of epistemology，The extension of epistemology has begun to expand significantly; from the 1960s to the 1980s，With the strong eruption of scientific knowledge sociology，Social Epidemia officially appeared on the stage of history and began to become the protagonist of epistemology。In this sense,，The appearance of social epistemology is not premature babies，but the inevitable result bet365 best casino games of water to the canal。From a more macro perspective，The evolution of social epistemology from traditional epistemology also meets the evolution of science from science to large science，This evolution also indicates that the knowledge production model changes from individual to collective，This transformation will be policy、specification、interests such as interests and defense embed the entire knowledge production chain，Traditional epistemology can never come back。

According to Professor Youyang's new book "Research on the Research on Knowledge and Social Disperture and Contemporary Social Contests"，An important social dimension contained in social epistemology is the research of scientific policies of knowledge。The famous American philosopher Steve Fuller, which the author has paid attention to, created a research path to pay attention to knowledge policies under the name of social epistemology，The earliest academic journal "Social Epidemic theory: a magazine of knowledge, culture and policies" its first -founding academic journal is "providing a forum for philosophy and social sciences，This forum combines the work of scholars from various disciplines，The production of knowledge for these scholars、Evaluation and verification have extensive attention。This magazine covers the origin and empirical research of the knowledge and specifications of the implementation of such research and regulatory factors，Guide to guide the contemporary knowledge cause "。This can be seen，Fuller's social epistemology is mainly a scientific policy study of knowledge，bet365 live casino games Its main task is the research on the normative research of coordination and knowledge of knowledge sociology。He regards social epistemologists as the formulator of knowledge policy，It can provide necessary and meaningful guidance to the improvement of the improvement of cognitive activities in cognitive labor distribution。For Fuller，Social episodes mainly focus on the organization of the knowledge production process，How to allocate the distribution of cognitive labor to achieve a certain goal，Therefore, he discusses the central issue of social epistemology as a question about how to organize cognitive activities。According to this understanding，Social epistemology is "a ideological movement with a wide range of interdisciplinary sources，It is trying to rebuild the issue of epistemology，Once the knowledge is regarded as the inherent social。It is usually regarded as a scientific policy of philosophy or a norms of scientific research "。Fuller is very prominent among many social epistemology researchers，Stars from his standardized research，At the same time, because of his research, it is to guide the entire scientific practice activity，For example, the management of science and the university、Retevation of scientific research institutions。Similar to most philosophers who are concerned about epistemology，Fuller believes that knowledge can be produced through social practice and what can be determined as knowledge. This should not only be descriptive，And it should be a standardized research。

In fact，Fuller is more regarding social epistemology Bet365 app download as a standard scientific policy research，Even looking at knowledge production from a standard perspective，Science、Public and specifications to be associated。With the deepening of research，People gradually realize that science is a social system，In order to better play its role，It needs to be managed by the rules obeyed by a set of scientific members，At the same time, it also needs to be coordinated with many other system areas，To this end, it is essential to clarify the internal working method of the scientific system under the demands of democracy.，This forms the source of the scientific policy research of knowledge。This kind of understanding naturally refutes three problems，First，Science is a system of autonomy。The scientific image of "Autonomy" is very convenient to isolate science and society，and close the door to the public。Second，Scientific manufacturing public products。For a long time，Science is described as the production and distribution system of open commodities，However, this is controversial。First，What are the open products provided by science，Is the research result or reliable knowledge or truth; second，What kind of open products are they，Is it the inherent open product brought about by the research or the public product generated by the system。third，Science is described as behaviors with some cognitive advantages。The scientific system establishes a specification，That is, all decisive steps and recognition results must be made public，But can this recognition advantage meet the selection Bet365 lotto review of norms，How to ensure their epistemology advantages? Therefore, the research on the scientific policy of knowledge has become a reasonable choice for social epistemology，and this view gives us a new field of vision to look at knowledge production。

I have given graduate students "Science Sociology" lesson，Indicates the sociology of knowledge、In the development process of scientific sociology at scientific knowledge (SSK)，You can see that social factors are in the production of knowledge、The degree of intervention and role in confirmation and defense is gradually strengthening。For example，Knowledge Sociology only pays attention to the external social conditions of knowledge production without paying attention to the system and content of knowledge production，and scientific sociology only pay attention to the production of scientific systems for knowledge、Acknowledged and allocated functions，Sociology of scientific knowledge is the content of scientific knowledge，Think that knowledge is constructed，This process is like power、Interest、The strong impact of many social factors such as class and gender。In this sense,，The emergence and development of social epistemology is the inevitable development of the times，Both the characteristics of the scientific development of the Great Science Age，The rise of scientific knowledge sociology in the 1970s and 1980s and the strong impact of social trends such as feminism。It is also in this sense，Fuller advocated social epistemology, that is, the research of scientific policies of knowledge, bet365 live casino games raised the aforementioned ideas to a new height。From this sense，Not only the generation and transmission of knowledge are the society，Organization of knowledge and even the entire scientific practice are also social。

　 Bet365 lotto review