Chatgpt would cause academic editors to unemployment?
November 03, 2023 15:13 Source: "China Social Sciences", November 3, 2023, Issue 2765, Issue 2765

Since 2023,ChatGPT and other generated artificial intelligence and universal language models have brought huge shock to the academic world。When we give a few keywords,Chatgpt can generate a papers that look good,These papers generated by artificial intelligence can hide the eyes of some senior editors and scholars,Turned into a formal article published in the journal。Some students have also used the paper edited by ChatGPT,I gave it to the teacher as a job,and get the teacher’s high score evaluation。These phenomena,No doubt point to such a question,Whether artificial intelligence like ChatGPT will make those humanistic intellectuals full of versatiles,Especially academic editing unemployment?

  bet365 Play online games

Before analyzing the challenge of ChatGPT on academic editors,We can recall a historical event in academic history -the famous Sokar incident。The New York Times headline on May 18, 1996,An important information is published,The famous quantum physicist Alan Soccal generates a paper with a computer,There are a lot of so -called "post -modern vocabulary" mixed in it。This article won the favor of "Social Text", which was quite status in the American literary world at the time,Subsequent "fraud" generated by this computer,Published on "Social Text" in 1995。Intera,No matter the academic editor of "Social Text", Arnrovitz、John Brunkeman,Still later Duke University well -known scholar Friedrick Jameson,All expressed affirmation of this article。But after a few months in the article,,Soccal has entered the New York Times to clarify the clarification of "fraud" generated by this computer。Sokar explained: "I decided to try a moderate (although it is obviously incompetent) experiment: a North American magazine of a cultural research -its editor team includes such as Friedric Jameson and Andrew · Outstanding Masters in these intellectual circles -Will this papers be published?,However (A) It sounds good,(b) It should coincide with the editor's prejudice。"Obviously,Sokar did this,I don’t want to insult a magazine and editor,and humanities。In his opinion,Writing of humanistic works under the banner of "postmodernism",Whether bet365 Play online games in the scholar circle,Still in the academic editor circle,and even the reader circle of the entire humanities,All are a kind of "advanced superstition"。

Questions caused by the Soccal incident,It is not just a quantum physicist and an influential academic magazine.,More importantly,Socal's computer editing "nonsense" "fraud",It opened a hidden mystery of the academic research of the entire philosophy and social sciences: whether the philosophy and social science papers are really talking about it; or according to a certain fixed format and template,and a certain specific prejudice,Synthetic articles for anesthetic human scholars? If it is the latter,This writing technology,It can be simulated and formatted by the computer,Imitation of the "No Secret" in the writing of scholars in philosophy and social sciences,and cater to the tendency and hobby of specific academic editors,It is produced as an academic cultural product on top -level academic platforms such as "Social Text",and spread widely in the so -called academic circle。In other words,Socal incident is important,Not in a challenge initiated by physicists,Instead of questioning the foundation of philosophy and social science research,That is, the ability of philosophy and social science does not have the ability to study real problems,They just repeated for thousands of years,In the college circle, it is just a fans who produce specific cultural products according to fixed templates and formats。Because of this,Many well -known humanities scholars are involved in this protruding argument,There are many scholars participating in the competence,Such as French philosopher Jacques Drida、Sociologist Bruno Latur,and North American philosophy and social science scholar Richard Robiti、Bruce Robins and others。These philosophy and social science scholars join the argument,Its purpose is no longer a counterattack on the mockery of philosophy and social sciences caused by the Soccal incident,but reinterpret the positioning of philosophy and social science based on academic writing and editing。In other words,Later scholars who were involved in the debate of the Soccal incident,Without exception, realize,If the essays and monographs of philosophy and social sciences,Can't truly touch the core question of human society,Just creating some beautiful in vocabulary and form、But in fact, there is no discussion on core issues,I am afraid it is not the blessing of philosophy and social bet365 live casino games sciences。Because once this atmosphere is in the banner of "postmodernism", it is after the banner,No one thinks about the real human reality problem,They only pay attention to whether their words are cutting -edge and professional,Whether the structure is symmetrical and logic is smooth,and ignore the empty soul behind these gorgeous words。

  Research on Artificial Intelligence and Philosophy Social Sciences

Care lens through the Soccal incident,What is the challenge brought by ChatGPT to humanistic academic editors? Although it is now 2023,Various words and words of post -Western postmodernism are no longer popular,The situation of the Chinese academic community and the cultural research with capital guidance tendencies in the West also have a difference,But in the face of large -scale language models and generation artificial intelligence,Today's Chinese philosophy and social science research also faces similar challenges。

Remember at a meeting of artificial intelligence,A scholar engaged in experimental physics asked such a question: "ChatGPT is easier to imitate the articles of liberal arts,Or is it easier to imitate articles in science and engineering? "The answer given by these scholars is,Articles in liberal arts are easier to make ChatGPT imitate,The reason is whether it is a liberal arts or a science department,The writing of the article has a certain form and template,This is the easiest part of ChatGPT。But there is an important part of the articles of science and engineering,It is not just the form of text,And there are a lot of experimental data,and theoretical interpretation and calculation based on these experimental data,These parts cannot be imitated at all。These experimental data can be obtained only through real scientific experiments,The deduction and calculations of all theories If you leave these reality experimental data and conclusions,Can't become a real scientific papers at all。

What are the articles in philosophy and social sciences? After launching version 4.0 in ChatGPT,People are surprised to discover,These generation of artificial intelligence can not only write a form of complete form、Logic perfect、Gorgeous papers on the rhetoric,You can even imitate the style of writing specific imitation papers of some famous artists。It can imitate Lu Xun’s style,Write a miscellaneous text full of laughter and scolding; you can also imitate Fei Xiaotong's style,​​Write a sociological papers Bet365 lotto review with deep academic skills。In other words,In the writing of philosophy and social sciences,There are indeed some associations and structures,ChatGPT can learn through machine learning,Through a large amount of corpus library,Discover and create it as a form of creation。but but,For the study of philosophy and social sciences,Such papers style and form,It is exactly what they applied as basic rules in unconsciousness,Even in writing,Can't directly understand them in their forms。Whether it is the peer in the academic world,It is still an academic editor in the journal industry,When they read an article,There is often an evaluation standard,Is this article conforming to the so -called academic specifications、Whether the word is accurate,Whether the form is rigorous and decent,These constitute a basic scale for the evaluation of academic papers。At this scale,can we further explore whether this article is involved in a real academic question。Since ancient times,There is a contradiction between things and literary talents,Han Yu、Liu Zongyuan's neo -essay movement,It is solving the gorgeous essay of the resignation.。and today,ChatGPT can be through the deep learning of the machine,Learn the writing style and form of philosophy and social science articles,But the same as the real scientific experimental data,Chatgpt cannot face us to face real social life,It can only put together various expressions and words in a limited corpus,But the academic editor and author of the philosophical social sciences and the author's keen touch on real humanistic and social problems。

Chatgpt would replace academic editors? the answer is,Partial energy,Partial cannot。Energy part is to help the article modify the sick sentence、Mistakes、Increased expressions and unsuccessfulness,Makes the article's rigorous and appropriate,This part can be given to generate artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT for。But the work level of the current generation of artificial intelligence,Even if this part,It also needs a lot of manual editing work to detect its validity,In this sense,The form of rigorous and logical form,Artificial intelligence can replace some jobs,But it is impossible to completely eliminate humans。In the connotation part,Chatgpt's ability is obviously a little stretched,The substantial content of these papers needs to be edited by rich academic care,Use your keen and profound academic experience to bet365 Play online games identify the value contained in these papers research。

  Artificial Intelligence and my countryPhilosophy and Social Science Research

The fundamental practice of philosophy and social science with Chinese characteristics is the great practice of rooting in the new era of socialism with Chinese characteristics,You need to see whether today's Chinese philosophy and social science scholars are subjective and original,Can it "based on the actual situation of China,Persist in problem orientation,Shouzheng Innovation、New Kaishi New "。Researchers for Chinese philosophy and social sciences today,Still academic editors,All need to think from this perspective to think about the dialectical relationship between genetic artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT and the research of philosophy and social sciences with Chinese characteristics。

First,From specific work,,The main idea of ​​academic editors should be guided from the form of the article to the problem orientation of the article。Because ChatGPT is not involved in the socialist practice of Chinese reality,There is no personal experience and perception,From the now look,Its function is still limited to the editing and generation of the article。Chatgpt and other artificial intelligence,The purpose is not to replace human work,So far,It is still an auxiliary tool in the specific research of human beings,In some formats and expressions,Chatgpt can obviously provide more effective assistance,Let the problems and ideas contained in the article,Show greater vitality at the new level。The work of academic editors is more about whether the questions talked about by the scholars have been fully developed and discussed,Have you given effective ideas and strategies,Whether to solve the problem in the end。In other words,Studies centered on problems,The focus of the work of academic editors。

Next,ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence is a tool for improving the level of philosophy and social science research,Academic editors and artificial intelligence can form an effective cooperative relationship。Many discussions today,People worry that ChatGPT will replace human work,Especially the work of academic editors,The core point of its core is that artificial intelligence like ChatGPT and the work of humans itself is a relationship of zero -sum game。Actually,The thinking of this zero -harmony game is not the era of artificial intelligence widely used today,Times in Marx,The spinning workers of that era were worried about hydraulic or steam ingot essence machine,Bet365 lotto review Will replace their work。Then history tells us,Those huge machines did not completely eliminate human work,On the contrary,The operation of those machines,Still requires workers to control and assist。similar to it,Today's academic editor,You can hand over some relative formal work to artificial intelligence processing,and artificially need to test and renovate the results of artificial intelligence treatment。For example,Now using Midjourney to enter the painting created by AI,Still need a real human painter for post -correction and modification,What kind of articles are generated,What kind of painting image is generated,In fact, human input guidance words are needed,to assist in generating artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT to create。This,On the one hand, it can save human academic editors to engage in a large number of repeated labor,On the other hand, you can also create another artificial work,How to more effectively enters the artificial intelligence and input keywords to guide it for creation。Brief words,In the era of artificial intelligence,More likely to generate the model of generating artificial intelligence and human beings closely collaborate,The good order collaboration of academic editors and artificial intelligence will greatly improve the efficiency of modification and editing papers and monographs。

Last,In the mode of academic editors and generation artificial intelligence cooperation,Realizing the prosperity of social sciences with Chinese characteristics。Philosophy and Social Sciences of Chinese Characteristics not only requires the practical wisdom of socialism with Chinese characteristics,It is also necessary to create an independent knowledge system and discourse system with independent Chinese characteristics。Of course,Knowledge system and discourse system for Chinese characteristic philosophy and social sciences,Not generated in the mind of a certain author or editor,Instead, researchers and academic editors of Chinese philosophy and social sciences from generation to generations have been generated in the construction of socialist construction with Chinese characteristics。Of course,If we are in the research and practice of philosophy and social sciences,Do not have the consciousness of self -consciousness of China's self -discourse system and knowledge system,At this time,Genesis artificial intelligence has a unique role,That is, it can absorb a large number of articles and monographs,Analysis Bet365 app download of the background algorithm and machine learning,In the end, this kind of discourse system and knowledge system is presented in front of Chinese scholars and academic editors。Of course,Even in the process of providing discourse system and knowledge system,Genesis artificial intelligence is just auxiliary,Real wisdom still depends on human scholars and editors。Tongli cooperation with artificial intelligence through academic editors,It can create a Chinese style papers and monographs,Let the development of Chinese philosophy and social sciences present Qianyan Jingxiu、Wanzhang fight for flow、The style of the cloud steaming Xia Wei。

  (The author is a professor at the Department of Philosophy of Nanjing University)

Editor in charge: Zhang Jing
QR code icon 2.jpg
Key recommendation
The latest article
Graphics
bet365 live casino games

Friendship link:

Website filing number: Jinggong.com Anmi 11010502030146 Ministry of Industry and Information Technology:

All rights reserved by China Social Sciences Magazine shall not be reproduced and used without permission

General Editor Email: zzszbj@126.com This website contact information: 010-85886809 Address: 11-12, Building 1, Building 1, No. 15, Guanghua Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing: 100026