Since 2023，Generative artificial intelligence and large general language models such as ChatGPT have brought great shock to the bonus bet365 community。When we give a few keywords，ChatGPT can generate a paper that looks good，These artificial intelligence-generated papers can hide from the eyes of some senior editors and scholars，Become a formal article and be published in a journal。Some students have also used papers edited and generated by ChatGPT，Sent to the teacher as homework，And received high marks from the teacher。These phenomena，All undoubtedly point to such a problem，Will artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT satisfy those knowledgeable humanistic intellectuals，Especially bonus bet365 editors are unemployed？

　　Sokal incident and its bonus bet365 effects

Before analyzing ChatGPT’s challenges to academic editors，We can recall a historical event in academic history-the famous Sokal incident。New York Times headlines on May 18, 1996，Published an important message，Famous quantum physicist Alan Sokal used a computer to generate a paper，It contains a lot of so-called "postmodern vocabulary"。This article won the favor of "bonus bet365 Text", which was quite prestigious in the American literary circle at the time，The following computer-generated “fake article”，Published in "bonus bet365 Text" in 1995。In the meantime，Whether it is Aronowitz, academic editor of bonus bet365 Text、John Brunkman，Frederick Jameson, later a well-known scholar at Duke University，All expressed their affirmation of the article。But a few months after the article was published，Sokal published a clarification of this computer-generated “fraudulent article” in the New York Times。Sokal explains: “I decided to try a modest (though obviously uncontrollable) experiment: a leading North American magazine in cultural studies—with an editorial staff such as Frederick Jameson and Andrew Would Ross, a distinguished figure in the intellectual community, ever publish such a paper？This paper contains obvious nonsense in the text，However (a) it sounds good，(b) It appeals to the ideological biases of the editors。”Obviously，The reason why Sokal did this，I don’t mean to insult a certain magazine or editor，and humanities scholars。In his opinion，The writing of these humanistic works under the banner of so-called "postmodernism"，No matter in the circle of scholars，Still in the academic editorial circle，Even in the entire circle of readers in the humanities，It’s all a kind of “advanced superstition”。

Problems caused by the Sokal incident，It’s not just a dispute between a quantum physicist and an influential academic journal，What’s more important，Sokal’s computer-edited “nonsense” “fake article”，Revealed a hidden mystery in the entire academic research of philosophy bonus bet365: Are the papers in philosophy bonus bet365 really talking about real issues；Still according to a certain fixed format and template，And a certain bias，A synthetic article used to anesthetize the minds of humanities scholars？If it’s the latter，This writing technique，Can be completely simulated and formatted by a computer，Imitate the "untold secrets" in the writings of philosophy and social science scholars，And cater to the tendencies and preferences of specific academic editors，Produced into academic cultural products on top academic platforms such as "Social Text"，And it is widely circulated in the so-called academic circles。In other words，The reason why the Sokal incident is important，Not that this is a challenge initiated by physicists，But it questions the foundation of philosophy and social science research，That is, philosophy bonus bet365 do not have the ability to study real problems，They are just repeated for thousands of years，Just fans who produce specific cultural products according to fixed templates and formats in academic circles。Because of this，Many well-known humanities scholars have been involved in this protracted debate，There are many famous scholars participating in the debate，For example, French philosopher Jacques Derrida、Sociologist Bruno Latour，There is also the North American philosophy bonus bet365 scholar Richard Rorty、Bruce Robbins et al。These scholars of philosophy bonus bet365 join the debate，The purpose is no longer to counterattack the mockery of philosophy bonus bet365 triggered by the Sokal incident，Rethink the positioning of philosophy bonus bet365 from the perspective of academic writing and editing。In other words，Scholars who were later involved in the controversy over the Sokal incident，Recognize without exception，If the writing of papers and monographs in philosophy bonus bet365，Cannot truly touch the core issues of human society，Just create something that looks beautiful in terms of vocabulary and form、But in fact, it is a treatise that does not touch on the core issue at all，I’m afraid it’s not the blessing of philosophy bonus bet365。Because once such a trend becomes popular under the banner of "postmodernism"，No one thinks about real human reality problems anymore，They only focus on whether their words are cutting-edge and professional，Is the structure symmetrical and logically smooth，Regardless of the fact that behind these gorgeous words is an empty soul。

　　Artificial intelligence and philosophy and bonus bet365 science research

Through the lens of the Sokal incident，Let’s come back and think about the challenges that ChatGPT brings to humanities academic editors？Although it is already 2023，Various Western postmodern terms and discourses are no longer popular，The situation in Chinese academic circles is also very different from the capital-led cultural research in the West，But in the face of large general language models and generative artificial intelligence，Today’s scientific research on Chinese philosophy bonus bet365 is also facing similar challenges。

Remember at an bonus bet365 conference，A scholar engaged in experimental physics once raised this question: "ChatGPT is easier to imitate liberal arts articles，It is easier to imitate articles written in science and engineering？”The answer given by these scholars is，Articles on liberal arts are easier for ChatGPT to imitate，The reason is that regardless of liberal arts or science and engineering，The writing of articles has certain forms and templates，This is the easiest part of ChatGPT to imitate。But there is another important component to articles about science and engineering，It is not just a form of text，And there is a lot of experimental data，As well as theoretical deductions and calculations based on these experimental data，These parts are completely inimitable by ChatGPT。These experimental data can only be obtained through real scientific experiments，If all theoretical deductions and calculations are separated from these real-life experimental data and conclusions，Cannot be a real scientific paper at all。

What about articles on philosophy bonus bet365？Launched in ChatGPT 4.After version 0，People were surprised to find，These generative artificial intelligences can not only write a formally complete article、Logically perfect、A rhetorically gorgeous essay，You can even imitate the writing style of some famous writers and write specific imitation papers。It can imitate Lu Xun’s writing style，Write an essay full of laughter and curses；You can also imitate Fei Xiaotong’s style，Write a sociology paper with profound academic foundation。In other words，In paper writing in philosophy bonus bet365，There are indeed some connections and structures，ChatGPT can be learned through machine learning，Through a massive corpus，Discovered and created as a form in becoming。However，For philosophy and social science research，Such a paper style and form，It is precisely what they apply unconsciously as basic rules，Even while writing，It is also impossible to directly grasp that they are within their form。Either academic peers，Also an academic editor in the journal industry，When they review an article，There is often an evaluation criterion，Whether this article complies with the so-called academic standards、Is the wording accurate，And whether the form is rigorous and appropriate，These constitute a basic criterion for the evaluation of academic papers。At this scale，Only in order to further explore whether this article touches on a real academic issue。Since ancient times，There is a contradiction between having something to say and being literary and talented，Han Yu、Liu Zongyuan’s New Ancient Chinese Movement，It is to solve the problem that gorgeous parallel prose is better than eloquent and connotative writing style。And today，ChatGPT can use deep learning of machines，Learn the writing style and form of articles in philosophy bonus bet365，But the same as real scientific experimental data，ChatGPT cannot replace us in facing real social life，It can only piece together various expressions and utterances from a limited corpus，But it cannot replace the keen sense of real humanistic and social issues of academic editors and authors in philosophy bonus bet365。

Will ChatGPT replace bonus bet365 editing？The answer is，Partially capable，Partially cannot。The best part is to help the article correct the wrong sentences、Typos、Poor and fluent expression，Make the vocabulary of the article more rigorous and appropriate，This part can be left to generative artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT。But as far as the current working level of generative artificial intelligence，Even this part，It also requires a lot of manual editing work to test its effectiveness，In this sense，The formal and logical part，Artificial intelligence can replace some jobs，But it is impossible to completely eliminate humans。And in the inner part，ChatGPT’s capabilities are obviously somewhat limited，The substantive content of these papers requires knowledgeable editors，Use your keen and profound bonus bet365 experience to identify the value contained in the research of these papers。

　　bonus bet365 and my countryPhilosophy bonus bet365 Research

The foundation of philosophy bonus bet365 with Chinese characteristics is rooted in the great practice of socialism with Chinese characteristics in the new era，We need to see whether today’s Chinese scholars of philosophy bonus bet365 have subjectivity and originality，Whether it can be "based on China's reality，Adhere to problem orientation，Keep integrity and innovate、Consolidate the foundation and open a new one”。No matter for today’s Chinese philosophy and social science researchers，For academic editors，We all need to think about the dialectical relationship between generative artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT and scientific research on philosophy bonus bet365 with Chinese characteristics from this perspective。

First，In terms of specific work，The main idea of ​​bonus bet365 editing should be from the form orientation of the article to the issue orientation of the article。Because ChatGPT is not physically involved in China’s actual socialist practice，No personal experience or perception，At present，Its function is still limited to editing and generating articles。Artificial intelligence like ChatGPT，It is not intended to replace human work，so far，It is still an auxiliary tool in human concrete research，In some formats and expressions，ChatGPT can obviously provide more effective assistance，Let the questions and ideas contained in the article，Exhibiting greater vitality on a new level。The job of bonus bet365 editors is more to check whether the issues discussed by scholars have been fully developed and discussed，Whether effective ideas and strategies are given，Have the problem been finally solved?。In other words，Problem-centered research，will become the focus of bonus bet365 editors。

Secondly，Artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT is a tool to improve the level of philosophy and bonus bet365 science research，Academic editors and artificial intelligence can form an effective cooperative relationship。Many discussions today，The reason why people are worried that ChatGPT will replace human jobs，Especially work such as academic editing，The core point is that the relationship between artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT and human work itself is a zero-sum game。Actually，This kind of zero-sum game thinking is not produced in today’s era when artificial intelligence is widely used，In Marx’s era，The spinners of that era were worried about water-powered or steam-powered spinning machines，Will replace their jobs。Then history tells us，Those huge machines did not completely eliminate human work，Opposite，The operation of those machines，Still need workers to control and assist。Similar to this，Today’s Academic Editor，Some relatively formal work can be handed over to artificial intelligence，And humans still need to check and re-modify the results of artificial intelligence processing。For example，Now using Midjourney to create paintings using AI，Real human painters are still needed for later correction and retouching，And specifically what kind of articles are generated，What kind of painting image is generated，A human being is actually required to enter the guide word，To assist in the creation of generative artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT。This way，On the one hand, it can save the time of human academic editors doing a lot of repetitive work，On the other hand, another kind of artificial work can also be created，That is, how to enter keywords into artificial intelligence more effectively to guide it to create。In short，In the era of artificial intelligence，The more likely model is the close collaboration between generative AI and humans，The well-ordered collaboration between academic editors and artificial intelligence will greatly improve the efficiency of revising and editing papers and monographs。

Finally，Under the model of cooperation between academic editors and generative artificial intelligence，Realizing the prosperity of philosophy bonus bet365 with Chinese characteristics。Philosophy bonus bet365 with Chinese characteristics not only need the practical wisdom of socialism with Chinese characteristics，It is also necessary to create an independent knowledge system and discourse system with Chinese characteristics。Of course，For the generation of the knowledge system and discourse system of philosophy bonus bet365 with Chinese characteristics，Not generated out of thin air in the mind of an author or editor，It is generated by generations of researchers and academic editors in Chinese philosophy bonus bet365 who continue to combine the construction of socialism with Chinese characteristics。Of course，If we are in the research and practice of philosophy bonus bet365，Does not have the awareness to independently think about China’s independent discourse system and knowledge system，At this time，Generative artificial intelligence has a unique role，That is, it can absorb the discourse of a large number of articles and monographs，Analysis and machine learning through background algorithms，Finally present this discourse system and knowledge system in front of Chinese scholars and academic editors。Of course，Even in the process of providing a discourse system and knowledge system，Generative artificial intelligence is just an auxiliary，True wisdom still depends on human scholars and editors。Collaboration between academic editing and artificial intelligence，Can create papers and monographs with Chinese style，Let the development of Chinese philosophy bonus bet365 show off a thousand rocks、Thousands of rivals contending、The grace of Yunzhengxiawei。

　　(The author is a professor at the Department of bonus bet365, Nanjing University)