Social psychology to develop the rule of China
August 09, 2023 10:03 Source: "China Social Sciences", August 9, 2023, Issue 2709 Author: Lu Xiaokang

China's rule is the governance system and governance road of Chinese characteristics。Realize Chinese governance,It is necessary to construct a philosophical and social science autonomous knowledge system that can explain the characteristics of practical practice and lead its development。Psychology as a hub discipline,Both natural science、Social Sciences and Humanities Triple Profit,A camp that also belongs to philosophy and social sciences,It is obliged to continue to provide discipline wisdom for the rule of China。In several branches of psychology,Social Psychology is related to the high degree of modernization of national governance and social governance in terms of research themes,The theoretical closeness to serving China internally,It should be displayed in the process of constructing China's independent knowledge system.,Become the rule of serving China、Development Original Theory、Disciplinary pioneer for constructing a knowledge system。

Bet365 app download  

Social Psychology has the difference between social psychology and sociology of psychology。From the theoretical perspective,The former focuses on the impact of social situations on individual psychology and behavior,Its theoretical center is still focused on the individual itself,Social situations are just emphasized as an external variable that affects individuals; the latter focuses on explaining individuals from the position of "social/collective/cultural first",Pay attention to the individual's current psychological content and behavior as the objective facts created by traditional culture and the current system。In terms of research methods,The former focusing on the dominant method of using psychology is the experimental method,Taking fine control and micro measurement of variables as the main purpose,Drawing on the method of imitating natural sciences to prove a small -scale causal relationship; the latter is more mixed in the method,Relatively speaking, questionnaire survey and typical case analysis。In terms of problem solving strategy,The former is more inclined to adopt micro -change strategies,If you change your own characteristics (such as personal attitude、Thinking Formula, etc.)、Change the small group characteristics of the individual (such as group atmosphere、Leadership style、Organizational culture, bet365 best casino games etc.),or changing the characteristics of the stimulus that directly contacts the individual (such as changing the color of the trash can to promote garbage classification、Use visualized methods to present government information to facilitate public knowledge, etc.); the latter is more inclined to use macro design ideas,Join the individual or group problems with the social system and historical and cultural,The conceptual concept of these problems into "social problems",Then seek the overall change of the social system and social mechanism,Dedicated to change the creation system incentive for the change of individual psychology and behavior。

Division and integration of social psychology of two orientations,runs through the development process of social psychology for more than 100 years from the beginning of the 20th century to the beginning of the 21st century。In this process,Division is the main line,Integration is a secondary line; integration is more as a subject vision and exists,Often when two orientation social psychology is unable to explain or solve certain practical problems,Only being remembered and mentioned。The late 20th century,Social psychology with two orientations does have some trends that blend with each other。This is mainly manifested in: the ecology of psychology research is becoming more and more deeper,In the research involved in social psychology,The interpretation of laboratory research gradually allows the interpretation of the experimental research on the spot,To strengthen the social and cultural attributes of individual behaviors; social psychology research in sociology continues to penetrate the hinterland of psychological research,The theoretical resources of the theoretical resources of psychology are more comprehensive theoretical claims,Emotional Sociology、Social Cognition、Behavioral decision -making and other topics have highly blended the methods and results of mainstream psychology。

Even so,Social psychology with two orientations is far from organic integration。Because the two major parent disciplines involved behind the theoretical perspective、Fundamental differences in the discipline system,The degree of integration that can be achieved by the intermediate discipline of social psychology,Therefore, it also limits its interpretation and promotion of social practice。

The knowledge construction path from the center to the center to the center of the problem center 

The history and reality of the social psychology of the two orientations of the two orientations,In fact, it reflects the bet365 live casino games adverse effects of paradigm split on discipline integration。Proposal of the concept of "paradigm",Scientific historian Kun himself thinks,Paradigm is just different interpretations of the world based on different values,Between paradigm is unpopular,Can't make simple advantages comparison and right and wrong。This definition mode of paradigm,It has implied potential propositions that do not need to be integrated between paradigms。This claim is for the development of the theoretical specific knowledge system,own positive functions,Because of this relativism position, it provides a methodologies at the theoretical system of the theoretical system based on its own understanding of philosophy and social sciences.,This helps the independence of discipline branches and the innovation of the theoretical knowledge。but,This has also weakened the communication motivation and cooperation demands of different disciplines to a certain extent。Since the paradigm of the bottom of the subject is already incomparable,No need to be in the method、The theme and countermeasure level To force fusion,The focus of the researcher only needs to be innovated in the method based on its own discipline paradigm、Refinement and countermeasures for theme,instead of considering whether these theoretical achievements and action claims can be coordinated at the practical level、Promote each other。

The knowledge production model formed there is the following characteristics: When facing the same social problem, different disciplines,More tendency to quickly discipline it、Paradist,Through the operation of real problems into the research problem within this subject,In -depth in -depth academic explanation,Then propose the corresponding governance strategy。In this mode of academic division of labor and knowledge innovation,The evaluation criteria for its research results mainly comes from the internal consensus of the discipline community,instead of the actual benefits from corresponding knowledge in social practice。This is here,The academic world and the social world have formed a certain degree of isolation。This isolation naturally guarantees academic freedom and academic independence to a certain extent,But it also largely restricts the actual influence of the discipline。Experts in different disciplines in different disciplines communicate with the same social reality and propose a solution strategy,Often eager to highlight its own subject characteristics,instead of paying attention Bet365 lotto review to the ultimate effectiveness of these strategies for solving practical problems,It is also less able to get rid of the barriers of discipline systems to objectively measure the effectiveness of this discipline strategy relative to other discipline strategies -because once it is considered not the best strategy to solve the problem,It is easy to damage the public image of the discipline,Not conducive to researchers to show the social value of their own subjects,It is not conducive to the social resources required for this discipline to obtain the development of their own development。

But,If the differences between the discipline cannot be combed reasonably,Try to reconcile the opposition with only "putting" without "solving",It will delay the speed of solution of real problems,This affects the credibility of all disciplines and the entire knowledge community in society。This actually illustrates how the way of thinking of the "paradigm center" or "discipline center" constitutes the complex tension that has both promoted and restricted in the development process of disciplines。

More importantly,As Professor Chen Yanqing thinks,"The actual problems in social life are often not based on the discipline,Slightly complicated question,Multiple disciplines will be involved when solutions,Need to conduct comprehensive research "。The origin of the question is so,The proposal of the problem countermeasures is even more like this。In front of complex practice,All theoretical paradigms are too simplified。Strengthen communication and integration between paradigms,Maybe it is not the inherent appeal of the theory or discipline development under the theory of the Kun style,But it must be the inherent requirements of social development and its governance process。Marx himself pointed out,"philosophers just explain the world in different ways,The question is to change the world ",It is intended to emphasize theoretical research or knowledge claims should have necessary action character and practical functions。What needs to change the world is a joint force,But there is no micro -discipline paradigm and the action solution based on these paradigms that can provide all the forces that help the world change。

For this,Social Psychology and other philosophy and social sciences,Both should face the basic trends and specific practice of Chinese and human society,Adjust the subject's center of gravity around the problems arising around the reality、Optimize the discipline layout、Reconstruction Bet365 lotto review Knowledge System。This requires the development of a problem -centered knowledge rather than a paradigm.。"Question" here,It should be a "big problem" that requires disciplines itself and requires discipline wisdom,instead of being a "small problem" within the field of vision within the subject of the discipline,The final criterion for solving the problem is not in what new theoretical sayings are provided for related disciplines,and to how much it provides practical wisdom for solving realistic problems。

Based on Chinese Practice Refining the Idential Social Psychology concept 

Concept is the cornerstone of academic。No logo concepts that belong to the nation and culture,It is impossible to create an independent knowledge system。Refinement of Chinese practice、Have the depth of the theory、A series of logo concepts that can be accepted by the international community,It is the development of philosophy and social sciences with Chinese characteristics、Key paths for constructing China's independent knowledge system,It is also the theoretical advantage that reflects the Chinese academic community、Academic advantages and discourse advantages must pass。

But it's just at this point,The theoretical constructive and subjective influence of Chinese social psychology is still lacking。Looking at the popular social psychology textbooks and research,The terms it uses almost all comes from Western psychology,Figure (schema)、Self Deplent、Flow (Flow), etc.,The psychological experience or psychological characteristics depicted by it certainly have a certain universality,But from definition to translation,There is a certain separation of the psychological experience and cultural traditions with the Chinese people。Social psychological textbooks that are "assembled" through these concepts、Theory and knowledge,Naturally, it is impossible to have a Chinese style、Independent knowledge system of Chinese weather。Of course, this is not exclusive to use these concepts,But it should be pointed out that we cannot rely on them to build China's independent social psychology system。

The vivid practice of the rule of China,In fact, it has provided historic opportunities for the concept of social psychology with Chinese characteristics。For example,Social mentality concept represented by "gain",It has reflected the theoretical potential of becoming a signature social psychology concept。As the "Standards and Good Governance Rule of Standards for National Governance in the New Era",The word "gain" has the political meaning of the people -centered,bet365 live casino games However, it is necessary to use scientific methods to explore and conduct theoretical interpretation。Conceptual speaking,A sense of gain will inevitably associate with the state's governance input (physical quantity) and the subjective experience (psychological quantity),How to scientifically measure the sense of obtaining different governance fields,Precisely grasped the transformation of the material input of governance and its psychological output and proposes precise governance countermeasures,All social psychological perspectives that need to be integrated with two orientations,Pay attention to individual psychological experience,Pay attention to social constraints,to improve the effectiveness of governance。At the same time,A sense of gain and security、Happiness sensation、A sense of justice and other series of social psychology concepts also have internal associations,There is both correlation and distinction。They together constitute the social mentality of the context of Chinese context.,Provides conceptual materials that can be further developed and utilized。How to develop social psychology theory that can be taken to unify these concepts and logically self -consistent,For the institutional efficiency of China's national governance、It has an indispensable important role in promoting the modernization level of national governance。Similar to this,The construction process of the social psychological service system,It has also triggered the difference between the unique "social psychological service" of the academic community and the "mental health service" universal "psychological health service" in the academic community。How to understand this kind of integration of mental health policy into social governance policies、Incorporate health China operation into the system practice of Ping An China Action,Then grasp the unique characteristics and general value of China's rule,The collective collaboration of social psychology researchers from psychology and sociological orientation also needs to,So as to provide a seemingly contrary to explain it、In fact, the theoretical framework of complementary governance practice。This constitutes another important way to develop social psychology of social characteristics。

In short,The question is the starting point of theoretical innovation、Source and home。Chinese -style modernization process has created many unprecedented achievements,It also faces many complex and difficult bet365 Play online games problems。Solve the process of these problems,It is both a process of governing modernization,It is also the process of deepening the science vertical vertical。The concept of social psychology refine、Construction of theoretical innovation and independent knowledge system,Only in the process of solving such problems,Only to get the greatest promotion and generate the greatest social benefits,Therefore, the theory of social psychology that serves the rule of China,Then push the construction of Chinese practice、Disciplinary system for serving the Chinese people。

(This article is the "Research on Network Space Governance of Doctors and Patients' Social Mental State" (20ASH015) staged achievements in this article) 

(Author is a researcher at Nankai University Base of the Socialist Theoretical System Research Center of Tianjin、Professor of Social Psychology at the School of Social Psychology, Zhou Enlai University of Nankai University) 

Editor in charge: Zhang Jing
QR code icons 2.jpg
Key recommendation
The latest article
Graphics
bet365 live casino games

Friendship link:

Website filing number: Jinggong.com Anxian 11010502030146 Ministry of Industry and Information Technology:

All rights reserved by China Social Sciences Magazine shall not be reprinted and used without permission

General Editor Email: zzszbj@126.com This website contact information: 010-85886809 Address: Building 11-12, Building 1, Building, No. 15, Guanghua Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing: 100026