In social survey research,Researchers often use questionnaire surveys and other methods to collect data。But can the interviewed performance evaluation questionnaire truly reflect the actual behavior of the respondent in the interview? May 2020,"Field Research" magazine published the post -doctoral post -doctoral Laura Jacobs、Professor Gert Loosveldt at the University of Lov Laurn's Sociology Research Center, and the empirical research papers of Koen Beullens, a senior researcher Kon Beullens, can accurately reflect the acceptance of being accurately reflected. Do you visit?。This article is based on the seventh European society survey data,Use a quantitative inspection method,It proves that the interviewed performance assessment can objectively reflect the response mechanism of the respondent in the interview survey,It is conducive to data assessment Bet365 lotto review and data quality improvement。But,The evaluation of the interview performance is not sensitive to the behavior that is not easy to detect。Therefore,Training for pre -visit for the interviewer、Optimized interviewees performance evaluation questionnaire and applicable to research conclusions,The reporter interviewed the first author of the paper Laura Jacobs。
bet365 best casino games
In Social Science Investigation,The quality of ensuring the collected data is the prerequisite for ensuring the overall quality。Because some participants have negative answers, etc.,Reduce the reliability of the data,More and more researchers advocate the evaluation of interview performances after the interview.,and use it as an effective parallel data source。In a large -scale data collection project such as a European Social Survey,The interviewer was required to fill in a questionnaire after each interview,To evaluate the quality of the interview and the performance of the interviewees。The interviewer assumed the function of "expert witness",It is both a participant at the scene,Observator again,Provide researchers with bet365 best casino games first -hand information about the research process。The interviewer determines the extent of the role of the interview performance evaluation in a sense。
Jacobs said,Pay attention to the interviewer effect in the evaluation of the interviewed performance。Each interviewer has its own way of working,and may adopt different standards in work。This shows that in -depth training is very important for the interviewer。The purpose of this in -depth training is to allow the interviewees to identify the "bad interview performance",and understand the potential source of the interviewer's deviation。
Jacobus thinks,To make the interview performance evaluation a reliable research tool,Interviewers need to learn how to cope with the inadequate interviewees,and identify the interviewed performance in time,Make sure the interviewer uses similar judgment standards as much as possible。At the same time,Interviewers should also realize that their own behavior will affect the respondents。Researchers must pay attention to the training of the interviewees。
Design scientific and reasonable survey questionnaire
Assessment questionnaire due to the performance of the interview is a medium for the interviewer bet365 Play online games to evaluate the performance of the respondent,Therefore,How to make questionnaires more scientific and reasonable as the focus of researchers。For this question,Jacobs put forward two suggestions on improving the quality of the questionnaire on the improvement of the interviewed performance evaluation。First,Under the premise of not increasing the burden of the interviewer,Let the evaluation questionnaire contain richer questions as possible。Questionnaire design can also try to add questions about the situation in the interview,and add some additional indicators that have not yet become conventional issues in the assessment questionnaire,If the concentration of the respondent's attention、Do the respondents keep listening before the interview question and ask。Second,Some problems in the current interview performance evaluation questionnaire,The expression is not very clear,It may also have subjectivity and different interpretation methods。Therefore,The wording of the evaluation questionnaire should be perfected,To ensure the evaluation problem faced by the interviewer is completely clear。
In this study,Although Bet365 lotto review the researchers affirmed the importance of the interview performance evaluation as a whole,But they also found,The correlation between different interviewed behaviors and evaluation of the interviewed performance is at different levels。Specifically,Interviewers are more likely to capture the two interviewed behaviors of the project (Item Nonresponse) and using the USE of Extreme Categories。This study found that it shows,The interviewer is more delicate、The response mode that is not easy to observe may not be too sensitive。For this,Jacobs told reporters,Effective training on different reactions and behavioral mode can be relieved to a certain extent。
Applicive problems about this research conclusion,Jacobs told reporters,This study based on the seventh European social survey,Its results should also be applicable to other face -to -category surveys,Organizational methods for evaluation of the interviewed performance are also similar in other face -to -face investigations。but,She does not think that this research conclusion can be generalized in other interviews and surveys,Ru telephone interview。In the face -to -face survey,The interviewee's evaluation of the interviewees bet365 Play online games depends to a large extent on visual clues。Although some clues can also be found in other types of interviews,But the information they get will be much less than the face -to -face visit。If the interviewee refuses to answer the question,The effect of this in phone interview and face -to -face interviews should be related,But in other respects,For example, understanding questions, etc.,The difficulty of judgment of telephone interviews is higher。Jacobs told reporters,This is a good extension direction for this study,In the future, you can explore the evaluation of the interview performance during telephone surveys。
Friendship link: The official website of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences |
Website filing number: Jinggong.com Anxie 11010502030146 Ministry of Industry and Information Technology: Beijing ICP No. 11013869
All rights reserved by China Social Sciences Magazine shall not be reproduced and used without permission
General Editor Email: zzszbj@126.com This website contact information: 010-85886809 Address: 11-12 floor of Building 1, No. 15, Guanghua Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing: 100026
>