The field of interdisciplinary research has not yet formed an influential evaluation model，Choose the appropriate scientific research influence evaluation standard to face challenges。The British Journal "Environmental Science and Policy" recently published by Elena Louder, a scholar of the University of Arizona Geographical Development and Environment,、Articles written by Carina Wyborn, a scholar of National University of Australia，The article summarizes the four principles that should be adhered to in the design influence evaluation standard，and explained the relationship between the knowledge production and communication of the evaluation framework and specific forms。Related issues around the evaluation of scientific research influence，Our reporter interviewed relevant experts and scholars。

bet365 live casino games

Evaluation of scientific research results on the influence of policies and practice is challenging。The influence has a variety of expression forms，Some can only appear in a longer period of time，Among them, many delicate and difficult changes。So，Only relying on traditional academic indicators such as publications and quotes，It is difficult bet365 Play online games to reflect the different influences of research results。But，Researchers from all over the world need to prove the influence of their work，To help their funding application or career development。

Therefore，Academic and practitioners explored a series of science、Policy and Practice Influential Evaluation Method，Drive the development of many new evaluation frameworks。These frameworks surpass traditional academic indicators，All aspects that try to depict influence。Different frameworks try to capture the non -linearity of different disciplines and fields of scientific research results and is vulnerable to environmental influence。But，In this rapid development area，Face these frameworks，Funder、Researchers and practitioners are difficult to accurately understand the effects of the influence of scientific research。

Laud and others through research，Test the epistemological foundation and assumption of different frameworks，and point out their similarities and similarities，To improve the scientific research influence evaluation。Based on literature review and qualitative analysis，Researchers summarized four rules of experience，Come to guide scientific researchers to accurately choose different backgrounds、Influential evaluation framework and indicators of disciplines and fields。1. Definition of the basic assumptions bet365 best casino games and influence of knowledge production。clarify how the research activities will have influence，This is an important prerequisite for the design evaluation framework。other，Definition influence is the first step of selecting indicators。Among them, it is clear why certain activities will have influence，and these influential possible manifestations。Second, try to measure the influence related to the process。Whether it is the scope of the definition of influence，Improve evaluation quality，Still evaluate different factors "contribute to influence"，All indicators that can reflect all kinds of subtle changes。other，Influential evaluation should pay attention to knowledge collaborative production activities，The focus of the evaluation can be placed on the individual changes of the participants，Improving these changes involved capabilities、Changes in professional knowledge，and changes in the way of understanding or defining the problem。Following these intermediate influencing factors is very important，Because they can be used as an important part of the evaluation results。Third, we must balance new development and expected results。Establish a part of an open evaluation standard，To cope with the newly generated or unexpected positive and negative results。Fourth, we must balance the indicators of fine differences and Bet365 lotto review simple quantitative indicators。For large research institutions，Quantitative assessment of influence may be very useful，But the accounting score sometimes concealed conceptual changes or other subtle changes。Simple quantitative evaluation may not record why the influence or how to change。So，When the design evaluation framework,，Must consider these situations。

Researchers discovered，The existing influential evaluation framework is in the overall design、Principles and the number of indicators、Time arrangement and implementation methods are different。These differences reflect the in -depth differences in people's understanding of the way of knowledge understanding and the definition of influence。But，The common theme is，Influential assessment must capture non -linear subtle changes。The above four experience rules are designed to provide a set of overall principles，Help researchers、Funders and practitioners based on their specific purposes and backgrounds，Select the appropriate influence evaluation framework。

　Promote the diversification of influence evaluation

In the evaluation of academic influence，A flexible and adaptable academic influence evaluation method should be adopted。Policy analyst at the Federation of Humanities and Social Sciences of Canada, Peter Severinson, thinks，The current academic circles are focused on how to better show academic influence，Bet365 app download The definition of "influence" itself lacks in -depth exploration。Cevrillinson thinks，Academic influence refers to the extensive impact of academic and creative exploration on society，This influence may be instant，It may also be delayed; it may be intentional，It may also be unintentional。Diversified indicators can be adopted when evaluating the influence，Researchers should also give full play to the subjective motility。Scientific research institutions、University、Society should provide necessary resources，Fully supports scientific research influence evaluation work。

Huang Maoxing, Dean of the School of Economics, Fujian Normal University, said，Influential evaluation research is a comprehensive、Cross work，Both need to adopt a variety of evaluation theories and methods，Based on practice，Make adjustment and scientific analysis with the times。This is a challenging research field。This article published by the British journal "Environmental Science and Policy" proposes four principles for design influence evaluation standards，It has strong guidance and practical significance。Where，Evaluate "Contribution to Influence"，It is necessary，This is the core content of the influence evaluation work，It is comprehensive to the evaluation objects、A must pass by three -dimensional Bet365 app download analysis。other，This article also emphasizes the need to balance new development and expected results，In the past, I often only pay attention to the results of theoretical and measurement simulation，but failing to feedback the reality well，As a result, some evaluation results only pay attention to whether it meets expectations，without reflecting new development in all aspects。This principle for personnel engaged in influential evaluation，Has strong inspiration and reference value。

Guo Cunhai, Director of the Social Culture Research Office of the Latin America Institute of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences，Academic influence evaluation plays an important role in academic development。In the new era，academic influence development also faces new requirements。Enhance academic influence、Academic Talk right，Promoting scientific research results Overseas communication，Need to optimize and innovate academic influence evaluation mechanism。academic evaluation agencies should strengthen communication with related research institutions，Time to feedback Times Requirements，Broaden academic communication channels。