bet365 promo codes newspaper comprehensively reports from foreign media A new study shows，The effectiveness of the general public in completing bet365 promo codes tasks is close to that of professional verifiers。

According to a report on the official website of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology on September 1，David G, professor at the school’s Sloan School of Management.Rand（David G. Rand) and others’ paper “Using the Wisdom of the Crowd to Expand Fact-Checking” was published on the same day in Science Advances, a journal edited by the American Association for the Advancement of Science。Hiring professionals to verify whether the bet365 promo codes content is true is an important method to combat fake bet365 promo codes，But the huge volume of online information and limited verification time make the workload of fact checkers too heavy。To this，This new study explores solutions for hiring lay people to identify misinformation。

Researchers used 207 bet365 promo codes reports that were flagged by Facebook’s internal algorithm for fact-checking，Randomly selected 20 articles and asked ordinary participants to read the titles and opening summary sentences of these articles，Then answer 7 questions about the extent to which the article is true and credible，Finally generate an authenticity score for each article。At the same time，3 professional fact-checkers reviewed and scored all 207 stories。

Experiment results display，The judgments of 3 professional fact-checkers were generally consistent。When the average participant is divided into groups with equal numbers of Democrats and Republicans，Their average ratings of bet365 promo codes stories are highly similar to those of professional fact-checkers。Regular participants also completed a political knowledge test and an analytical thinking tendency test。Overall，Learn more about sociopolitical issues、Participants who were better at analytical thinking judged bet365 promo codes reports more closely than professional fact-checkers，Whether they are Democrats or Republicans。

Rand et al.，The performance of ordinary participants is encouraging。In many practical cases，The judgment of the general public is similar to or better than that of experts。This study shows，Even in an activity such as identifying misinformation, which is deeply affected by the polarization of opinions，The wisdom of the general public still plays a role。The above findings have a wide range of applications，Some large social media platforms are actively trying to “crowdsource” fact-checking tasks for bet365 promo codes reports。The wisdom of the general public can be used to label content，Can also be used to provide reference for ranking and recommendation algorithms。

Researcher reminder，Any organization that adopts the "crowdsourcing" model needs to find a good participation mechanism，If the opportunity to participate is open to everyone，The “crowdsourcing” process may be unfairly influenced by partisanship。In addition，News organizations and social media platforms may not find enough active users。Although identifying false news is beneficial to the whole society，But how to motivate individuals to invest time and energy in bet365 promo codes is also an issue that needs to be considered。

　(bet365 promo codes/Compiled)