Rhetoric research can be divided into two categories: traditional rhetoric research and cognitive rhetoric research from the perspective of research。Traditional Congress Studies believe that,Rhetoric is common in literary works,The role is just a modified text,to achieve aesthetic effect,A added component belonging to daily language,It is an informal language phenomenon; cognitive rhetoric research believes,Rhetoric is a common phenomenon,Decisure to have essential differences in the existence of literary language and daily languages,The role is not limited to the modified text,but an important reflection of human thinking。The author elaborates the cognitive research of the rhetoric,It aims to explain the dependence relationship and organizational model of a series of rhetoric,And think that this is a major progress in rhetoric cognitive research,It reflects a strong theoretical tension and original thinking。
As an important scholar in this field,Famous Cognitive Linguist in Spain、Review of Cognitive Linguistics Professor R. De Mendoza proposed a rhetoric cognitive network model。New achievements of the study of cognitive research,It makes up for the imbalance of previous rhetoric research,Integration of cognitive linguistics and rhetoric,It has opened up a broad prospect for the cognitive research of various rhetoric。
bet365 Play online games
Cognitive research on Bet365 lotto review rhetoric began in Metaphors We live by G. Lakoff and M. Johnson。They think,Rhetoric is an important language phenomenon that reflects the human cognitive system。Since then,Conceptual metaphor (Conceptual Metaphor)、Conceptual Metonymy and the interactive research of the two have received unprecedented attention。But,As of now,Cognitive research in other rhetoric in the language is still in a vacuum or gray area。To solve this problem,Mendoza proposed the rhetoric cognitive network model,Think that all the quotations in the language can get a reasonable explanation from the perspective of cognitive operations,and the rhetoric is not isolated,Instead, there are various associations,There are also differences in semantic effects。
The cognitive operation of the rhetoric involves two basic relationships: one,Domain-Internal Relations,that is A for B,There are two types: Expansion and Reduction,Metonymy can be explained;,Cross-Domain Relations,that is A IS B。Cross -domain relations or cross -domain reasoning: there are two types: similarity between the two areas and the differences between the two areas。The former can explain Simile、metaphor (metaphor)、OverStatement and UNDERSTATEMENT,The latter can explain the anti -language、Paradox and Oxymoron。Of course,Relations and cross -domain relationships in the domain can also interact。
The rhetoric is in a interconnected and hierarchical network,Divided into basic (basic) rhetoric and non-basic (Non-Basic) rhetoric。Conceptual Structure and Meaning Effects do not need to rely on other rhetoric,bet365 live casino games Self-Standing,Including all the quotations listed above。The latter derives the former,Including Hypocatastasis、Synesthesia、analogy (Analogy)、Alegory、Synecoche、Merism (Merism)、Anthimeria (Anthimeria)、Antonomasia、Proverbs、Move (hypallage)、Auxesis、Auxesis、anti -narrative (litotes)、Ironics (SARCASM)、Antiphrasis、satire and expected description (prolepsis)。
Rhetoric Type Network Create a connection in three ways: first,Type-Type-Token Relationship,If there are categories of metaphors under the metaphorical type、Xiangdai、Transfer category、Instead of name and move。2,Overlap relationship,such as metaphor、analogy and various forms of bright metaphors,There are overlapping in some characteristics between them,But who does not exist who is whose variant。third,Convertibility relationship,If the expected description can be transformed into another rhetoric under certain context and language conditions through the pretentious description。Another,The semantic effects of the rhetoric: The semantic effects and attitudes of the indicator (Denotational)。Metaphor、analogy、Mingyu、Metaphors、Paradoxes and Specific Independent Segents,Their attention points are mainly through a class of entity、Situation or event to interpret another type of entity、Situation or event。Anti -language and exaggeration are specifically used to express the attitude of the speaker。
Rhetoric Cognitive Network model reflects the integration of cognitive linguistics and rhetoric。MENDOZA believes that each type of non -basic rhetoric has a strong correlation with Bet365 lotto review a cognitive operation of a basic rhetoric,It is also the basis of the semantic effect of quit。
Take the basic rhetoric anti -language (Irony) as an example。Professor of Mendoza thinks,This resignation is a sharp comparison in the conceptual situation or concept event in the two cognitive domains,As a result of the conflict。The target domain is an observed reality (Observable Reality),The speaker default it is obvious for the obedient; the source domain is the error assumption or belief that the speaker pretends to be agreed。The conceptual conflict in the two areas eventually leads to a cross -domain mapping,The conceptual structure of the source domain (Cancellation of Conceptual Structure),that is, Professor Mendoza's "frame structure coverage" (Frame Structure Override)。Of course,This is a compromised clue based on the obedient.、Tone clues、Gesture clues and other。"Frame Structure Cover" is the key to understanding the meaning of anti -language attitude through the conventional reasoning mechanism。
An example is an example with non -basic rhetoric (AUXESIS) as an example。As the name suggests,It is the maximum value of Hyperbole,Its semantic effects also come from cross -domain mapping。Where,The source domain is an enlarged amplification of the concept of a certain scarar concept (up-scaling),It is virtual; the target domain is the concept of this scalar,With physical、The true representation of the situation or event。Obedient emotional response to the exaggerated target domain,Caused the significance of the attitude of the quit。
It has important theory and application value
Bet365 lotto review The theoretical value of rhetoric cognitive network model is,It emphasizes the theoretical feasibility of rhetoric cognitive research。New achievements of the study of cognitive research,Rhetoric Cognitive Network model realizes the integration of cognitive domain operation and rhetoric research,Reflected the interdisciplinary character,Because it integrates cognitive linguistics、Essays of disciplines such as rhetoric and semantics。Its core point of view,If the generality of cognitive operations、The correlation of the rhetoric、The regularity of semantic effects, etc., is well reflected in this network model。
Rhetoric Cognitive Network Models make up for the imbalance of rhetoric cognitive research。Cognitive linguistics and rhetoric is closely linked,Added each other、complement each other。But when dealing with rhetoric language,The attention of cognitive linguists is mainly focused on the so -called main rhetoric,Especially metaphor and metaphor,Occasionally exaggerated and ironic,Other rhetoric has not received enough attention,Its theoretical significance is generally underestimated。Another,The association and semantic effects between rhetoric are rarely attracted to the academic circles。The rhetoric cognitive network model presents the following features: at the same time, pay attention to the cognitive interpretation of the main and non -main rhetoric; the inherent connection of the type of rhetoric in the type of the type;。All these,All to a certain extent make up for the imbalance of rhetoric cognitive research。
Rhetoric cognitive network model has strong application value。Under the rhetoric cognitive network model,All rhetoric phenomena in language expression bet365 live casino games have been uniformly explained,Including basic rhetoric and non -basic rhetoric、Common rhetoric and rare rhetoric。Rhetoric Cognitive Network model provides a comprehensive and systematic research path for language research,Requires we cannot only pay attention to metaphor and transposition phenomenon,should be placed in the entire rhetoric cognitive network,Seeking a unified cognitive explanation of various rhetoric,Construct the interconnection between them。To explain the cognitive motion and semantic effect of a rhetoric,It can only be carried out in the network system through comparison and comparison with other rhetoric。Although the foundation of the rhetoric cognitive network model is based on English,But in the study of Chinese and other languages,Especially the systematic interpretation of cognitive operations behind a certain language based on a certain rhetoric,Have great advantages and application prospects,It has to be verified and improved in future research。
(This article is the "Main Inter -Erejue Study of the Maggie -based English Construction" (2019QN03) phased achievement of the Youth Project of Hebei University of Economic and Trade)
(Author Unit: Institute of Foreign Language and Language, Beijing University of Foreign Languages、Foreign Language Teaching Department of Hebei University of Economics and Trade)
Friendship link: The official website of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences |
Website filing number: Jinggong.com Anmi 11010502030146 Ministry of Industry and Information Technology:
All rights reserved by China Social Sciences Magazine shall not be reprinted and used without permission
General Editor Email: zzszbj@126.com This website contact information: 010-85886809 Address: 11-12, Building 1, Building 1, No. 15, Guanghua Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing: 100026
>