In the past five or six years，The German academic community set off a surge in Marx and Engels。The 200th anniversary of Marx's birthday in 2018、The 200th anniversary of the 200th birthday of Engels in 2020 greatly promoted the sudden increase in related publications。Only a few examples here，such as Michael Quante and David P. David P. Schweikard "Marx Manual: Life、Works and Impact ", 2016）、Michael Heinrich's "Karl Marx Und Die Geburt Der ModernellSchaft, 2018）、Detelerf Vond (Detelef Vonde "on the street: Friedrich Engels and the" Failure Revolution "(1848-1849)" Lution "Von 1848/49, 2019）、Rolf Hecker (Rolf Hecker) and Ingo Stützle's new version of Engels "Anti -Dulin Theory" (2020) and related essays、"Friedrich Engels: Red and Black Change Dragon" edited by Eberhard Illner。Although some of them use MEGA2 document，But a large part of the main concern is the different aspects of Marx and Engels theory，without paying special attention to the Mega version or mega research。

For the specific research of Mega，The controversy is usually published in the Marx-Eygels-JAHRBUCH，referred to as "Mej") and "Marx-WEUE FOLGE，referred to as "Mefnf")，Occasionally published in "Zeitschrift Für Marxistische Eriche Eriche Eriche Eriche Eriche Eriche Eriche Erneuer，referred to as "ZME" for short)。Except for journal articles，There are five other works directly involved mega research，"Critical Critical Criticism: Kritik Imhandgemenge.die Marx’ scheSchaftskritik Als Politisch Einsatz, 2018）、Hagen Klemer"New Vision of Marx and Engels: Mega"  Von Karl Marx Und Friedrich bet365 best casino games Engels. Die Marx-Engels-Gesamtausgabe (Mega), 2019）、Ulrich Pagel's "The only person and German ideology: The Der Einzige UND DEUTSCHE IDEOLOLOGIE TERANSFORMATION DES  Diskurs IM  2020）、"Research on the Basic Issues of Truth and Revolution: The Basic Issues of Marx Society" compiled by Matthias Bohlener ftskritik, 2020）、The "Boris N. Nicholaevsky: Marx N. Nicholaeus: The legacy of the Russian Social Democratic Archives (1922-1940)" (1922-1940 "(BORIS I Nikolaevskij. AUF DEN SPUREN Des Marx-WACHLASSES UND DERCHIVE DER Russischen SozialDemokraite (1922-1940), 2021）。

These arguments are roughly divided into four aspects。

First，Controversy on "German Ideology" (hereinafter referred to as "Form")。2017 MEGA2 version of "Form" was published shortly，"The Year of the Marx Engels" (2017-2018) published a series of latest research articles on "Form"。Gerald Hubmann (Gerald Hubmann) believes，Although Marxism in the 20th century Marxism's classic interpretation of "Form" tends to plan it as a complete work，But obviously Marx and Engels do not intend to publish this manuscript。The disorderly state of this manuscript is the reason why people have tried to provide the new version of "Form" many times。Hubman believes that "there is no" form "work"。This view is aimed at Inge Taubert, editor of the former MEGA2 version of "Form"，Because Taobert believes that "form" is not a bunch of different manuscripts，Instead, it belongs to the component of the same work。According to Hubman's statement，"Form" is not a complete work。On the contrary，It is an integral part of the journal published by Marx and Engels.，Among them, Moses Hess also played a certain role。Hes is not the writer of "Form"，Instead, the writer of the planned journal。Husman (and U. Pagel and Daniel Drewski (Daniel Drewski) emphasized，The central character Bet365 app download of the young Hegel who tried to criticize Marx and Engels is not Ferbaha but Max Steina。It was this confrontation that prompted Marx and Engels to focus on Felbaha。This is also U. Pagel's views made in his recent book (2020)。Pagel tried to change the state of the marginalization of Stener in the past research，Restore Steiner's importance to "Form"。Another，He also comprehensively sorted out and compared 12 different versions of the manuscript order of "Ferbaha Zhang" in the "Form"。Matia Burend continued Pagel's reason in "Truth and Revolution"，Try to completely reproduce the contact between Marx and Steina，and pay special attention to the refutation of Herne's Steiner。Christine WeCKWERTH comprehensively reconstructs the writing process of "Form" and its political philosophy context，and pay special attention to Marx and Engels that regard "true socialism" as ideology。Kuan specially explored the English version of "Ferbaha Zhang" edited by Terrell Carver and Daniel Blank。He thinks，The Capae version of "Ferbaha Zhang" attempts to reintegrate the interpretation of "Form"，But its work is very narrow in politics。This version tends to interpret a pure interpretation，instead of substantially examined different versions of the specific specific editing practice。Recent，Lucas Rudolph (Lucas Rudolph) strengthened the point of view，The main goal of considering "Form" is not to construct historical materialism，Instead of criticizing contemporary German philosophy and "real socialism"。

2，Controversy of the political concept contained in the social criticism of Marx in the "Form"，That is the debate about Marx's political philosophy。This dispute can be divided into two aspects: First, the "critical" view of Marx and Engels，The starting point is Marx's description of "critical" in the "bet365 Play online games Introduction to the Black French Philosophy": "Criticism involved in this content is the criticism of fighting; and in the fight，The question is not whether the enemy is noble，Is it equivalent to whether the fanfare，Is it interesting，The question is to attack the enemy。"The controversy about Marx's" critical "view originated from the research project of Marxist scholar at Osbaburuk University，They regard the philosophy of Marx in 1843 in 1843 as a re -interpretation of the leading clue of the social critical function evolution of Marx's social critical function of 1840-1850。Whether it is "Critical Critical Critical Critical Critical Criticism" in "The Holy Family"，It is still "critical communism" in the early 1850s，Criticism of political economics in the 1860s，Burend、Sch? 觟 nfelder and Spekker believe，Marx's critical concept needs to be transformed from an isolated text foot comments.，rebuild it as a product that helps to reshape the 19th -century political struggle。The second is the relationship between Marx and Engels and the socialist socialism。This debate about Marx's political thought occurred in the "New Cluster of Marxy Engels Research Collection" (2016-2017) around "Marx、The round table discussion of the launch of Engels and Socialist "，Core issues include the relationship between Marx and Engels proposed by Danga Vileisi with Early Communist's utilitarian views; Jan Hoff and Michael Brie (Michael Brie ) The proposed Marx's anti -borrower writer such as Robert Owen、Thomas Spencer、John Gray and Thomas Horgiskin's acceptance problem; Marx's criticism of the concept of contemporary freedom and equal concepts on Polida's concept of contemporary freedom and equality proposed by Nadja Rakowitz，and the relationship between Marx proposed by Bertel Nygaard in the early working class movement bet365 live casino games with the relationship between the communist politician William Weitling。

third，Controversy about the history of mega1。The latest published "Marx and Engels Research Collection New Series" Volume 6 of MEGA1 Researchers and David Londonov's proven by David Boris N. Nicholaevsky's research album Concentration reflects the perspective of all parties。Relff Hekel and Wladislaw Hedler (Wladislaw Hedler) fully examined the life of Nicholaevsky before and after the Russian revolution。1922，Nicholaevsky was forced to exile in Germany in the Soviet Union and was forced to exile in the Soviet Union。But two years later，He was assigned by Liang Zannov to coordinate and coordinate the communication with the Moscow's Marx Engels Institute with the German Social Democratic Archives，Assist the Institute to sort out documents、Files and collection information。Due to Moscow, especially the Anti -Moshewk cleaning campaign at the Institute of Marx, Egers Institute, and Hitler's power in Germany，Nicholaevs left Berlin in 1933 to Paris，In 1940, immigrated to the United States again。The other articles of this volume examine the process of Nicholaevsky's entering Amsterdam International Social History Research Institute，and traced back to the important part of the establishment of a research institute (including Marx、Engels、The role of Cattsky and William Libukneri) played the role of。The last part of the volume specifically introduced the Gustav Mayer、Hans Stein、V. V. Adoratskii (V. V. Adoatskii) and N. W. Posthumus (N. W. Posthumus)、Communication for archives administrators and editors of the Netherlands and Germany。

fourth，Special attention caused by Marx's notes in MEGA2's fourth part of MEGA2's debate on the economic theory of Marx in the 1850- 1860s。This research trend can be summarized as (but not bet365 Play online games limited to) research interest on Marx's "London Notes" and "Crisis Notes"。Although many Marx scholars pay special attention to the Asian production method concept in Marx's "Outline"，But what does "Asian formal form" mean that what is still an open question。SOICHIRO SUMIDA (especially London Note (especially the ninth notebook) and the third volume of "Capital"，Research on Marx's view of the Asian form of Marx's capitalist economic form，and try to answer this question。Norman Jakob tried to clarify Marx's intention to publish the book "Political and National Economic Criticism" in the mid -1844 in the mid -1844, and the development of the plan until 1851。other，He also inspected the attempts of Marx's search for publishers, as well as the communication between him and the Roland Daniels and Engels when they reached a transaction with German publisher Kota，and how Marx continues his economic research in the early 1850s。Research on Marx's "Crisis"，Mori Mori and Rahff Hekel's article are particularly worthy of attention。Senxianzhi believes，Marx's "Crisis" is the product of his research on the economic crisis in 1857，It is also a large amount of economic data and review results published in publications such as "Economist", "Times", "Morning News" and "Guardian".。Mori Xianzhi pointed out，Although the economic crisis is not uncommon in the 19th century，but the crisis in 1857 has significant significance。Because it is the first global crisis，The first mature case for economic models suitable for the business cycle。Before the crisis in 1857,，Marx has recognized it in the early 1850s，The next crisis will be different from the crisis of 1847，It will have industrial nature，instead of currency or business。He also foresees the dual crisis of industrial production and insufficient supply of agricultural product markets。Based Bet365 app download on "Crisis Notes"，Senxianzhi comprehensively explained how Marx developed this idea。Hekel overview Marx's influence on the 1857 crisis and its influence in Europe, especially the potential impact of the political revolution, which is interested in the political revolution.。Hekel thinks，Marx's main motivation for detailed research in "Crisis" is to use a special case of global crisis in 1857 to verify his economic crisis theory。

　　bet365 Play online games