In the academic world，Academic production and consumption，or research、Published、Evaluation and even management and other links，Together constitutes an academic ecosystem。Since 2019，As the Ministry of Education has pushed the "New Liberal Arts" construction，The development of digital humanities in China is also accelerating，You can feel the impact of digital humanities in the field of humanities and social sciences。Digital humanities entering the academic ecosystem，It's like a new fish that has been cast into the pond，There is a subtle effect on the overall ecology of the pond，and trigger the humanistic discipline in the knowledge basis、Research method、Literature acquisition and other changes。

　　Bet365 app download

Digital Humanities mean the knowledge transformation of the humanities in the digital era，This transformation is performed at least in two levels: First, knowledge representation，Show the existing knowledge in a digital manner; the second is the level of knowledge discovery，that is, find new knowledge with the help of digital technology。Digital humanities focus on knowledge in the early days，It is the auxiliary of traditional research; the maturity stage will focus on knowledge discovery，and become a tradition of traditional research, even alternatives。

The first digital humanistic form that was accepted and used by the academic community，Digitalization of literature on the level of knowledge。With the advancement of the literature，The original paper pile of the original paper pile of literature was pushed to the frontier of the digital。Starting in this area，Tading back to literary scholars such as Qian Yanshu began in the 1980s' efforts。"Academic Training and Academic Standards" published by Professor Rong Xinjiang more than ten years ago，List the "Search of Electronic Text" Special Festival，And said that you should write a "Electronic Chinese Studies"。Professor Huang Yinong, "Tsinghua University" in Taiwan also proposed the concept of "E research" based on digital literature。Tsinghua University China Classical Literature Research Center has advocated the construction of the "Chinese Classics Knowledge Base，referred to as CCKB for short)，This structured、association、The database of knowledge recycled type is the product of the integration of big bet365 Play online games data technology and traditional literature，It is expected to provide new infrastructure for academic research。

As people gradually digitize the existing knowledge，and the continuous growth of digital native knowledge，A Bolges -style "Babel Library" project has been started。Facing the "Yuan Universe" of this knowledge，People’s pain points have changed from the lack of knowledge to knowledge "premium"。Digitalization expressed in knowledge，Call the corresponding knowledge to discover the way。Before the appearance of digital technology，An idea of ​​processing text in a quantitative manner，But the substantial changes of knowledge discovery appear after using the digital method。For example，Moliti's 2000 when he proposed "Far Reading"，Not really combined with digital technology yet，It was not until 2009 that he started using big data analysis for research。

Changes in the way of knowledge discovery，In turn, it has caused further changes in knowledge representation。Knowledge representation from digitalization to data，Then to structured data and associated data，You can discover knowledge on the unprecedented magnificent volume。For example，"Statistical Analysis and Research on Chinese Classical Poetry Law" project uses big data technology，Statistics of vocal rhythm in the classical poetry database close to the full sample，The true law of the rhythm of poetry may be revealed，Therefore, the old theory that was previously based on local samples。We have reason to look forward to，In the limit of the traditional research department or the limit of each word，Digital humanities may develop breakthrough development，major impact on academic research。

　　Digital humanities call for new academic publishing

In the printing era，Between different texts、Between different media、Different forms of knowledge keep distance，In the digital era，These relationships have become more direct and timely。For example，The results of digital humanities may not be text，but a data set、Software or website，This has challenged the concept of academic publishing in the printing era。Real digital publishing may not be a digital version of paper publications，but database publishing、Semantic publishing, etc., is different from traditional publishing in new forms，The readers of the semantic publishing are not human but machine。Tim Bernas-Lee once said，Web3.0 is "Semantic Web"，The Internet itself will be converted into a giant database，Computers will simulate human methods Bet365 lotto review to process content，All data can be based on context、Concept to understand and connect。

Views from the more wide accepted academic circles，Publishing refers to a behavior that puts the work in any way，But in the digital and Internet era，What exactly is "public" seems difficult to define。Max Bascal believes that there are two activities in the center of publishing，That is review and promotion，Because they solve the problem of "what is the public"。("King of Content: Undested and Rebirth of the Publishing Industry") and，Maybe more fundamental publishing elements are still review，Because if there is no review，There is only the media without publishing。Audit activities include screening and evaluation，From this sense，Publication itself is also an evaluation behavior。

Development of digital humanities，On the one hand, it is driven by the endless digital technology，On the other hand, after the human knowledge and information reached a certain scale，There are inherent needs for new methods for information processing。With the continuous accumulation of knowledge data in the digital era，Human worry about the lack of information is decreased，The trouble of information overload is increasing。Facing the predicament of information overload，People’s main countermeasures are search and filter。Google with search services、Baidu and other search engines，and Zhiwang、Founder、Weipu and other journal databases。Current，The mainstream mode of digital publishing in the field of humanities and social sciences，Known as "Zhiwang Mode" by scholars such as Zhu Jian，That is, it is published by the journal editorial department to complete the paper journal，Zhiwang and other database vendors will then database the digital version of the paper journal，Published in the form of a database。This is essentially a combination of paper publishing and database publishing，It is under the management method of the decentralized industrial layout and concentrated publishing number of Chinese journals，Special products for digital transformation of academic publishing。The disadvantage of "Zhiwang Mode" is，Database vendors and journals lack the ability to become digital publishing subjects，Objectively caused the absence of digital publishing subjects，Learn database publishing and academic production alienation。Only find a new model that can stimulate academic production and academic communication potential，The subject of digital academic publishing will Bet365 app download only be born，Digital transformation of academic publishing will be really completed。

Information filtering function，Traditionally published by journals and other publishing media，But in the era of digital media and digital publishing，It will inevitably call a new type of filtering function。This new mode of digital academic publishing，It has to be jumped out of its own limitations，Explore on the basis of benign interaction and cooperation。Some people in the industry proposed，This may be a "platform media"，This media retains the editing review and screening function，The quality of the publishing content is guaranteed，At the same time, it will also push it targeted to users，Realizing the promotion function of publishing。Based on this，Such platform media can also promote publication and content production、Academic Research, etc., such as fusion of the original separation links，Accommodation of open acquisition、Enhanced publication、Semantic publishing and other new publishing forms，and embedded in OCR、Deep Learning、Technical tools such as natural language treatment，Integrate various types of databases，Solution and personalized services that provide knowledge and information，Create convenience for new academic research under the humanistic paradigm。In the field of humanities and social sciences，"Chinese College Series Professional Journal" established by academic journals and Zhiwang of some universities，Preliminary factors that have some platform -type media，But there is still a lot of distance with the digital publishing form that is truly suitable for digital humanities.。

The combination of new digital publishing and digital humanities，It is conducive to the emergence of new academic models。As Annie Berdick, etc.，"Due to open source、The introduction of the concepts of crowdsourcing and the penetration of digital publication and open acquisition，Digital humanities have fundamentally touched the knowledge production methods and academic exchange models in the field of humanities and social sciences "(" Digital Humanities: Game Rules to Change Knowledge Innovation and Share "。

　　The impact of digital humanities on academic evaluation

As a new research form，Digital humanistic achievements are often difficult to recognize in the evaluation system。Therefore，Digital humanist scholars often issue the demands of the existing evaluation standards，Even calling for a new evaluation system。If you want to change the unfavorable position of digital humanities bet365 live casino games in evaluation，Digital humanities also need to pay more attention to academic evaluation，Even actively participated in the optimization of the academic evaluation system。This includes the establishment of digital humanities and academic standards and exerted an impact on the existing evaluation system。

Inside the digital humanities research community，Need to gradually clarify the concept boundary of digital humanities，Against the consciousness of academic community，Freshly identifies the specious fake and inferior digital humanities research and remove it，Gradually establish the basic framework and evaluation standards of digital humanities research; from the perspective of humanities and academics，Then more scholars need to prove the academic value of digital humanistic research with solid digital humanistic achievements，Establishing horizontal judgment standards between digital humanistic achievements and broad humanistic achievements，So competing for digital humanities。That is，Digital humanities need to adjust the research direction，Improve your overall research level。Digital humanities research is not outside the humanities，Not to mention it。Digital humanist scholars need to connect the academic context of traditional disciplines，The key difficult problems that really solve the key difficulties affecting the development of disciplines，Even launching subversive results，Humanities and academics to traditional disciplines bring new ideas and vitality，This makes the humanistic community look at the digital humanities and humanities。Only this，The academic standards of digital humanities can really be established，This is an important path for digital humanities to get out of the evaluation difficulties。

In addition，Digital Humanities Evaluation Dilemma and some other performances，This is related to the current status of Chinese humanities and academic evaluations。For example，The results of digital humanities are often judged because it is difficult to include the mainstream of the discipline、Published、Quote、Reprinted and other links are at the edge position，Even some results are not journal papers or monographs，Instead of data set、Visualized data、Website、Software and other forms presentation，This is even more difficult to enter the existing evaluation system。

The current academic evaluation system itself still has some unsatisfactory things，For example，Documents and light other achievements。The tendency of the "Thesis" of the Bet365 lotto review academic world is still serious，The tendency of the "Thesis" of the academic world is still serious，It is also related to the scientific research management system that is quantitative standards and result -oriented，Humanities with digital humanities; in fact, the "Journal Comment" principle is used in the essay evaluation，Mix academic evaluation with periodical evaluation，There are serious logic misplaced; in the journal evaluation，Quantitative evaluation is favored by the management department for its objectivity，Occupy the mainstream position，The logic of "Journal Comment" again，Get the advantage of the peer evaluation in the essay evaluation;，Heavy influencing factor and light other indicators; in the composition of the factors，Pay attention to a single indicator of reference behavior，Analysis of the differences between disciplines and reference motivation; cross -research is not obtained because of not obtaining discipline status，It is inevitable to be marginalized in academic evaluation。

From the perspective of digital humanities research，In the design of the academic evaluation system，It should be more friendly to cross -disciplinary cross -disciplinary cross -disciplinary research; because in quantitative evaluation，The influence factors with citation statistics as the core are too single，Pay attention to "Classification Evaluation"，Analyze the motivation behind the reference behavior。The interesting thing is，This kind of evaluation system that is not friendly to digital humanities，The mainstream method is a quantitative evaluation based on the influencing factor as the core，It is justified with digital humanities。The earliest group in China that pays attention to and invested in digital humanities，Groups with quantitative evaluations from research actually come from the field of maps。The bell must be tied to the bell，To solve the dilemma of digital humanities，Perhaps it is also necessary to actively participate in the design and construction of the humanities and social science evaluation methods。

Despite the consensus of peer evaluation and quantitative statistics，But digital humanist can introduce richer algorithms in academic evaluation，Promote a more diversified and refined quantitative evaluation system。For example，The era of prevailing in social networks，Quote and evaluation can be expanded to Weibo、WeChat、Facebook and other social media evaluations、Like、Push and other behaviors。Some scholars have proposed alternative/supplementary measurement based on this idea，Hope，This is a direction bet365 best casino games worth looking forward to。

The diversification and refinement of the emphasis on evaluation methods and indicators mentioned above，All are the strategies for optimizing the standard of academic evaluation;，It is also necessary to change the administrative dominant evaluation system，Let the evaluation power return to the academic community。Academic evaluation is the key link for the formation of academic ecology，Looking forward to people from all walks of life work together，Make full use of new thinking and new technical means，Promote the healthy development of academic evaluation，to guide academic research and academic publishing, etc.。

In short，The development of digital humanities is expected to trigger the knowledge foundation of Chinese people in knowledge、Methodism and publishing evaluations and other changes。We are optimistic，Looking forward to the era of digital humanities，It can form a discipline to integrate with each other、New humanistic academic ecology of humanistic and technical benign collaboration。

　　(The author is the editorial board of the "Digital Humanities" magazine of Tsinghua University)