Recently，Professor Wu Xiaoming of Fudan University in "On the Basis of Material History of Marx Political Philosophy" (hereinafter referred to as "Wu Wen"), he criticized some research on the academic circles of my country about Marx's political philosophy，Professor Duan Zhongqiao published "Political Philosophy、Marx Political Philosophy and Material History -Discussion with Professor Wu Xiaoming (hereinafter referred to as "Duan Wen")，This controversy around Marx's political philosophy has aroused widespread attention。"Wu Wen" proposed that in recent years, my country's research on Marx's political philosophy has unprecedentedly high，Many studies are committed to exploring Marx's views on "freedom", "justice", "equality", "fairness"，and try to enable research to form a theoretical dialogue with some issues that can be studied with some issues that can form a theoretical dialogue。But many studies have fallen into the intellectual theory of modern ideology，and starting from some priority intellectual views，Construction of the conceptual system of Marx's political philosophy through conceptual analysis。This illusory ideology solution，reversed the theoretical relationship between the real world and the conceptual world，Limited to subjectivity and therefore completely violate the philosophical nature of the historical view of materialism。"Wu bet365 live casino games Wen" proposed that the foundation of Marx's political philosophy is the reality of social history，Social and historical reality is not a direct reality，but the existence of historical inevitability，The primary thing about the research on Marx's political philosophy is to penetrate the current social history reality。"Duan Wen" clarified the concept of "Wu Wen" with the concept of analysis of philosophy，It is believed that "Wu Wen" is based on the political philosophy of Hegel French philosophy.，And think that the law and national theory in the historical view of materialism as Marx as Marx's political philosophy cannot be logical。"Duan Wen" believes that Marx itself does not have a standardized political philosophy，But Marx has a discussion on the concept of standardized political philosophy，These concepts can be studied combined with the normative research of contemporary Western political philosophy。This controversy presents the division of philosophical purpose and methodology，"Duanwen" tends to Rols -style modern standardized political philosophy paths，"Wu Wen" as "Plato -Hegel" tradition，In terms of methodology, it presents the division of analysis of philosophy tradition and the traditional research method of European philosophy。But if this discussion is only understood as a general differences in general differences between history between different philosophy traditions，or different discourse systems about the right to define the right to concept，Nothing new。The academic value of this argument lies in，"Cold Reflection" through the bet365 live casino games boom of Marx's political philosophy，Let us return to the prerequisite criticism of the starting point of the problem，To accurately grasp the nature of Marx's philosophy in the complicated opinions。

Marx's political philosophy，With the "political philosophy heat" with nearly ten years，Gradually become academic hotspots。In 2006, the 6th "Marx Philosophy Forum" with the theme of "Marxist Political Philosophy: Interpretation and Innovation" was held at Nankai University，It can be said that this meeting opened the prelude to the contemporary academic community on the discussion of Marx's political philosophy，An important consensus of this meeting is that the political philosophy constructed of contemporary Marxist nature needs to accurately grasp the realistic dimension。Along with the continuous and deepening of China's social reform and development process，Fairness and justice issues have become important time concern。In 2013 at Xiamen University, the "Four Merchants Forum" with theme of "Social Justice in Marx's Thinking Resources"，further promoted the academic world's attention to Marx's "justice" thought。But research around Marx's "justice" thought，Repeated entanglement with the so -called "Wood Difficulty" in the following years，Research on Marx's political philosophy to the analysis of pure ideas and even words and syntax。Proposal "Whether Marx believes that capitalism is justice" is a typical question of conceptual theory，It is the ideological maze that has long came out of the materialist history in 1845 when forced Marx bet365 live casino games to return to 1845。When we still treat such an inappropriate question as a "problem"，As a result, I can only hold Wood's paradox in the thorns of the words and paragraphs.。Professor Duan Zhongqiao's article "Analysis and Response of the Based on the Based on the" Wood Proposition "text" published in 2017 revealed the so -called "Wood Drops"，restore and analyze the misunderstanding of the "Wood Proposition"。Unfortunately, there are still many researchers who are trapped in the conceptual conceptual concept that cannot be escaped in the illusion of conceptual theory，Continue to make a unnecessary fight with this illusion。

At the same time，The historic dimension and practical dimension of Marx's political philosophy gradually hidden，Start from the subjective regulation，The conceptual system of conceptual analysis and logical deduction constructing the concept system of "Marx Political Philosophy"，Become a more common methodology，That is, through copying Rols，Tailoring and collage out of a political philosophy image shrouded in halo。This research path comes from the contemporary definition of political philosophy: the empirical research on political facts belongs to the field of political science，Political Philosophy is a standard study of politics，and should follow the subjective legislation，That is logic。But the criticalness of philosophy，Not only the request for the other side，At the same time, it is possible to ask for in fact，That is the prerequisite for the facts of the facts。Political philosophy should not ignore the prerequisite Bet365 lotto review criticism of politics，As Marx said: "Criticism of the true philosophy of the modern national system，Not only does it expose the contradictions in this system，Explain these contradictions，Learn the formation process of these contradictions and the inevitability of these contradictions。"in" The Critical Critical Criticism of Hegelfa "revealed the premise of" modern politics "is the separation of" political country "and" civic society "，Private birth is a sign of the birth of the modern country。At this point, Marx and Liberal Gentian's judgment in "The Freedom of the Ancients and the Freedom of Modern People"，Their understanding of modern politics shared the same narrative starting point。But the difference is，Liberal acceptance of this separation，and use this separation as a prerequisite for political philosophy of contract theory。and Marx does not accept this premise，Criticizing philosophy for this premise。Marx pointed out，This separation leads to the universality of human society，Abstract、Inverted and fictional "Political State" monopolized，Benefiting into a parallel and opposing "ultra -dust world" with the world of life，Politics has become the so -called "philosophy of the people's life"。The essence of this abstract "philosophy of the sutra" is just the reflection of "civic society"。Corresponding questioning of political philosophy，The pursuit of the normative system is understandable。But when we want to give it the name of Marx，The essence of always remembering the concept of materialism bet365 live casino games is，reveals the upper architectural nature of modern politics and its conceptual system，If our political philosophy stops only in the conceptual construction and logic analysis of the conceptual concepts within the abstract political field，There is a risk of deviating from the "Material History" in Handan's academic steps。

Back to the controversy of "Wu Wen" and "Duan Wen"，Although there are huge differences on the specific point of view，But the two also shared some basic consensus: First of all，Whether it is a broad political philosophy definition or a narrow political philosophy definition，Whether it is from the European tradition or the analysis tradition to investigate，Marx did not have a tradition of constructing a political philosophy system from Ying Ren's subjective legislative departure; followed by，Whether the historical view of materialism means in the Marx philosophy system, the body theory or methodology，The nature of the materialist history of Marx philosophy is determined。Looking back at the Marx Political Philosophy Research in the past ten years，These two basic consensus，Perhaps it should constitute our prerequisite reflection on this "boom"。After "Cold Reflection"，We will find that we must really promote the advancement of Marx's political philosophy research，It is necessary to take historical reality as the problem.，Taking the historical view as the theoretical orientation，Reappearing the theory。

bet365 Play online games