The arrival of the era of big data cloud computing highlights the ghost of currency。Different from simple commodity circulation process (W—G—W)，The monetary circulation process of capital (G—W—G) is actually a capital logic that is different from the logic of ownership。The capital logic of money essentially contains the ghost state of dematerialization，The formal regulations attached to this ghostly currency will reshape people and their state of existence in social reality。The non-linear results bring about the rejection of the monetization of personality，When the era comes when the meaning of the use of objects once again takes precedence over people's possession of objects，As a new intermediary method for the circulation of objects in the network system, the credit mechanism may completely lose the possibility of being abstracted as a monetized intermediary。Small data-based credit that uses the monetary system as the only measure of bet365 score，May also be replaced by distributed credit。Then next，Can the pursuit of “use” replace the pursuit of “all”，It becomes an important factor in whether the logic of capital has the possibility of self-subversion。From this perspective，The use bet365 score of goods that valorizes "use" becomes a concept that needs to be clarified，We need to return to Marx’s text itself，Exploring the philosophical meaning of the concept of "use bet365 score"。

　The concept of "use bet365 score" always runs through currency、labor force、Constant capital and many other links，Thus affecting the production and exchange of capitalist society，Is an important category of Marx’s labor bet365 score theory。Marx in "Das Kapital"，Defining use bet365 score by the usefulness of things，“The usefulness of things makes things use-bet365 score”。He divided the use of use bet365 score into three different situations，That is, the use bet365 score of useful things、The use bet365 score of labor products and the use bet365 score of commodities。The first two use values ​​outside the logic of capital are the use values ​​excluded from political economy by Marx，As for the use bet365 score of the last commodity produced by capital，becomes the core issue to be discussed in the criticism of Marx’s political economy。The third use bet365 score，That is, the use bet365 score of the commodity，Together with the exchange bet365 score of commodities, they constitute the duality of commodities。“This duality of labor contained in the commodity，First proved critically by me。This point is the key to understanding political economy，Therefore，To be explained in more detail here。”Marx’s understanding of the use bet365 score of commodities is based on his critique of capital logic constructed in Capital，That is, "This is the special status of use bet365 score in certain economic relations"。

In Marx’s view，In the logic of bet365 score under the conditions of capital production，Production is production for the needs of others，Because only in this way can capital increase；However，The usability of things is only to meet the needs of individuals，Not produced for others，So if the exchange is only based on the usefulness or use of the thing，It is impossible to achieve capital growth，Usefulness is valuated into use bet365 score，Exactly the manifestation of capital alienation。Then，Is use bet365 score in the philosophical sense of Marx political economy?？Answer to this question，In fact, changes are also taking place in Marx himself，"Become a use bet365 score，For products，It seems to be a necessary prerequisite，And become a commodity，For use bet365 score，It seems to be an insignificant provision。Use values ​​unrelated to the economic formal regulations，That is to say，Use bet365 score as use bet365 score，Does not belong to the research scope of political economics”。

This text appeared in Marx’s final draft in 1859、In the original text published in the book "Critique of Political Economy"，Influenced many successors' understanding of the concept of "use bet365 score" when studying "Das Kapital"。The famous American Marxist economist Sweezy in the 20th century said in his book "Theory of Capitalist Development"，“Marx excluded use bet365 score (or ‘utility’ as it is now called) from the field of political economy，The reason is，It does not directly reflect a social relationship”。However，The reason why Marx believes that becoming a commodity is irrelevant to use bet365 score，In fact, the logic of capital cannot yet rule all production and life，That is, there is a method of exchange of labor products or products that is external to the bet365 score system constructed by the logic of capital。

In the 1970s，The concept of "use bet365 score" was reawakened and explained by the French postmodern social theorist Baudrillard。He focuses on the concept of use bet365 score，Developed a critique of Marx’s political economy。Baudrillard regarded Marx's understanding of use bet365 score as the usefulness of things that can satisfy human needs as an anthropological illusion。"In Anthropological Illusion，It only focuses on the relationship between human needs and the useful qualities contained in things that can satisfy the needs，The opposite，Use bet365 score itself is a social relationship。”Baudrillard’s criticism of Marx seems very sharp，However, in fact it also contains a lot of subjective "misjudgments"。First，This is his critique of Marx’s “anthropological” assumptions about use bet365 score。Baudrillard discusses the concept of "use bet365 score" in the sense that Marx excludes it from political economy and repositions it in political economy，Use bet365 score in the Marxist philosophical sense is in capitalist society，With its unique historical conditions，That is, it is premised on the overall relationship between production and exchange，Rather than the rigid presupposition of metaphysics that transcends specific historical stages as understood by Baudrillard。

Next，Baudrillard understands use bet365 score as an abstract usefulness，The reason is that the needs it meets are also human abstract needs。However，This confuses the logic of exchange bet365 score and the logic of use bet365 score distinguished by Marx。In the capitalist exchange system，The exchange process abstracts away the difference in use itself，Turn to exchange bet365 score，Convert commodities into things comparable in bet365 score for exchange。The difference in exchange bet365 score between commodities，The essence is the difference in bet365 score，Therefore Marx said，Commodity has the dual attributes of use bet365 score and bet365 score。“The commodity sheds all traces of its naturally formed use bet365 score in its bet365 score form，Sloughed off all traces of the special useful labor that created it，The chrysalis becomes the same social incarnation of undifferentiated human labor。Therefore，It is not clear from the currency which commodity it is converted from。In monetary form，One product is exactly the same as another。”In this process，What is abstracted is bet365 score，Instead of use bet365 score，Use bet365 score is only an abstract existence in form。“Misreading” from Baudrillard，Precisely what will be concrete in the Marxist sense、Historical、The usefulness of things，That is, the natural attributes of objects are directly incorporated into social relations，The fetishism that believes there should be more than exchange bet365 score，There should also be fetishism of use bet365 score。

　“Individuals do not first relate as subjects of need，Relationships as individuals，Only when each person exceeds his or her own special needs，Only then can he enter into the social relationship structure，Only in order to truly meet your own needs。”Marx believed that everyone must use other people as a means to achieve the goal of satisfying their own needs，But at the same time，This process of satisfying one’s own needs will also become a means for others to satisfy their needs。In this sense，Marx indeed weakened the anthropological presupposition of use bet365 score，The special historical situation of the capitalist system in which it is located is highlighted。But，In fact, it has to be said that this approach is accompanied by its in-depth research on the logic of capital，Aware of its social erosion、Theoretical responses based on the depth of control。

About this issue，Hiromatsu Wataru's answer is more clear: "Then，In what sense does use bet365 score belong to the scope of political economics？‘Only when the use bet365 score itself is formally determined’，Think that ‘it is directly reflected in certain economic relations, that is, the material basis of exchange bet365 score。’”This is exactly what Rosdolsky is concerned about，The distinction between “content” and “form”。Sweezy、Hilferding and others’ understanding of Marx’s distinction between “use bet365 score” and “exchange bet365 score”，It’s all a simple dichotomy of the content of the economic fact of commodities。

According to Rosdolsky，Such an understanding loses the historical dimension emphasized by Marx，That is, the duality of commodities is a concept based on the historical process of the development of the capitalist mode of production。This leads to such an understanding that goes against the grain，Returning to the ahistorical thinking mode of classical political economics criticized by Marx。In other words，First，Rosdolsky thinks，When in specific social production relations and social historical conditions，Use bet365 score is not just regarded as a natural materiality and is excluded from the scope of political economy discussion，When the materiality of use bet365 score is modified by a specific social form，It should be included in political economy。"In other words，Should the use bet365 score space be considered to have economic significance，It can only be determined based on whether it is related to social production relations。To the extent that it affects these relationships or is affected by these relationships，Of course it is an economic category，And beyond that - in terms of its purely natural properties - it does not belong to the scope of political economy。”

Next，Rosdolsky thinks，Marx’s exclusion of “use bet365 score” from economics has certain limitations，That is, limited to simple commodity circulation。In pre-capitalist societies，There is a surplus of the products people produce，Is the basis of exchange，The direct purpose of people’s production and exchange is use bet365 score。The use bet365 score in this historical scenario for the owners and buyers of the goods，All are expressed as the direct usefulness of things，Can satisfy the needs of both parties at the same time。

However，Once you enter capitalist society，Production and consumption will begin to separate，Exchange bet365 score replaces use bet365 score and becomes the purpose of social production and exchange。And because of the intermediary exchange bet365 score，Use bet365 score has also become the use bet365 score of a society where people are interconnected，Simple commodity circulation is not what Marx wanted to focus on，Use bet365 score after entering the capitalist system has acquired its economic significance。At the same time，“Use bet365 score” that acquires its own form of development within the capitalist system，In turn, it also begins to participate in influencing and changing this economic relationship。Because the abstract form of labor is premised on individual concrete labor，Therefore use bet365 score is also the premise of the bet365 score form。

In the process of equivalent exchange，bet365 score must be expressed in the form of use bet365 score，And the completed form of this equivalent form，It’s currency。Therefore，It can also be said，Use bet365 score directly affects the emergence and development of this equivalent form of money。“When goods are exchanged for money，Material changes and form changes occur simultaneously，Because in currency，The content itself falls within the formal requirements of economy。And here，Money is converted into commodities，At the same time, capital is transformed into material production conditions。What happens is the reproduction of a certain use bet365 score，It is also the reproduction of bet365 score itself。”

In summary，An answer or judgment to the question of whether Marx’s use bet365 score belongs to political economy，No matter the answer is yes or no，In fact, you can find relevant textual basis，You can also use it to explain your own views。So，The key to the problem is，What is the purpose of this judgment。Use bet365 score is not just the premise of the bet365 score form of money，It is also the prerequisite for the establishment of all other commodity bet365 score relationships。In the historical context where capital logic dominates，Use bet365 score can certainly be discussed as a concept inherent in Marx’s political economy。But if based on current big data cloud computing、Blockchain、Under the new historical background brought about by various new technologies such as the global logistics system，Returning the concept of use bet365 score to a certain pre-capitalist natural materiality，You can deny that it is a purely internal concept of political economy。In other words，The connotation of the concept of use bet365 score itself should also be interpreted in line with the times according to specific social forms，So that it can strip away the bet365 score attributes assigned by capital logic in the possible future sharing society，Thereby returning to true usefulness。

　(Author’s unit: Department of Philosophy, Capital Normal University)