Humanities and Social Sciences academic publication must establish a consensus on knowledge theory
April 20, 2021 09:56 Source: "China Social Sciences", April 20, 2021, No. 2150, April 20, 2021 Author: He Yunfeng

In recent years,Academic publication in the field of humanities and social sciences in my country (only refers to Chinese publication,Same below) There is still lack of knowledge of knowledge、Low -level duplication and other phenomena。At the same time,The publication of humanities and social sciences in my country also appeared in the total number of papers atrophic、Academic works Publishing costs increase、The decrease in the publication of academic works。According to China Zhiwang data, it shows,The annual total number of annual issuance of most of the core journals of humanities and social sciences in my country has been in a general decline in the past 5 years。The reduction of academic publication reflects the decline in the contribution rate of humanities and social sciences in Chinese humanities and social sciences to the total amount of human knowledge。To reverse the current situation,The priority is that the academic publication of humanities and social sciences in my country should reach some basic knowledge theory consensus as soon as possible,Promote the number and quality of academic publication simultaneous improvement。

bet365 live casino games The first knowledge theory to be established is the consensus is,Academic publication belongs to the category of human knowledge innovation。Academic publishing is different from general press and publication,More care about the cause of human knowledge progress and development。The purpose is to spread the personal knowledge of the researchers through strict scientific demonstration and logic test to the academic community,The inspection and criticism of other researchers、Repeated verification and multi -view angle confirmation,Last acceptance as public knowledge。So,Academic publishing is essentially a category of human knowledge innovation,Researchers must be objective、The conclusion of the results and logical derivation of neutral and truthful reports。This indicates,Academic publication is not to explain your views or so -called ideological expression at will,Not to express personal subjective opinions,The conclusion that it must publish a strict scientific program。

The consensus consensus to be established in the second one is,Academic journals and academic publishing institutions engaged in formal academic publications should conduct standardized academic publications。Modern production bet365 Play online games is performed in a standardized method,Modern knowledge production must also be performed in a standardized way。For example,Academic papers should be published in academic journals or published publicly in academic works,It must be evaluated by peer experts。Because knowledge production is a professional field,Only peer experts in the same field can determine whether the paper has the characteristics of knowledge innovation。Although there is a possibility of misjudgment of the peer review,But overall,Putting all researchers in the equal position of academic publication,Using knowledge innovation as an important criterion for measuring papers。So,The peer evaluation mechanism is regarded as the academic publication of the most consistent knowledge theory standard。From the practice of the international academic community,It is impossible to be identified as standardized academic publication without the publication of peer reviews。Another example,Academic papers must have the essential characteristics of knowledge theory,You must consider the accumulation of knowledge。So,Any researcher must first have a sufficient and accurate grasp of the cutting -edge dynamics of existing related research bet365 Play online games areas,This reflected in the schedule of the paper should be a standard configuration。However, there are situations in the field of humanities and social sciences in the field of humanities and social sciences that despise and even ignore the literature review,Scholars often set up past studies without care。Knowledge is cumulative,Related existing knowledge innovation should become new knowledge innovation "lighthouse",This is determined by the essence of knowledge published by academic。If the academic publication of our country will move towards internationalization,Then academic journals and academic publishers must seriously conduct academic norms based on the standards of knowledge theory。

The consensus consensus that the third to be established is,Humanities and social science researchers must strictly abide by the logic of knowledge innovation when conducting academic creation。Humanities and Social Sciences Research is committed to discovering social laws,Only beyond the description of the level of social phenomena,Explore the essence behind the phenomenon,It is possible to produce beyond unknown knowledge。but but,Transcendence of existing knowledge,Not the researcher's self -claiming that surpassing bet365 live casino games it is surpassed,Instead, to withstand repeated verification。Researchers must objectively and accurately present the reliability of scientific research conclusions、Strictness of logic、The credibility of the theoretical description,and the conclusion must be tested and repeated。Only this,Personal knowledge can be gradually recognized as universal public knowledge after the personal knowledge is published。If the scholars are too passionate about personal opinion,Specializing in non -academic publication away from knowledge innovation,Even if you do not follow the basic logic, you can publish at will,It will lead to the abuse of humanities and social sciences' academic publication resources,Unable to play the function of promoting human knowledge growth。

The consensus consensus to be established in the fourth to be established is,Manage the rules of academic publication in accordance with the laws of human knowledge development。New knowledge that meets the standards of knowledge often has incomplete places。If you do excessive management of academic publications and publications,Using too harsh standards to measure new knowledge,Although this may stem from a good motivation to pursue academic publication of high -quality development,But in fact, in the process, Bet365 lotto review the opportunity to promote human knowledge growth。From the development experience of countries around the world,Academic publication is basically the natural growth of the research needs of the academic community。So,Academic publication needs to introduce knowledge theory standards,Manage it in accordance with the law of human knowledge。

In short,To improve the current status of humanities and social sciences,Need multi -party collaboration,Formation of knowledge theory consensus。Researchers should write and engage in scientific research in accordance with the standards of knowledge theory; publishers (publications and publishing agencies) shall prosper and engage in academic publications in accordance with the standards of knowledge theory; Published。

 Bet365 app download

Editor in charge: Zhang Jing
QR code icons 2.jpg
Key recommendation
The latest article
Graphics
bet365 live casino games

Friendship link: Official website of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences |

Website filing number: Jinggong.com Anxian 11010502030146 Ministry of Industry and Information Technology: Beijing ICP No. 11013869

All rights reserved by China Social Sciences Magazine shall not be reprinted and used without permission

General Editor Email: zzszbj@126.com This website contact information: 010-85886809 Address: 11-12, Building 1, Building 1, No. 15, Guanghua Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing: 100026