China Higher Education has officially entered the stage of popularization in 2019，University governance must also be compatible with the characteristics and requirements of this stage。So，What are the main challenges faced by research university governance at this stage? How should Chinese research universities respond?

Downside of the scale of higher education in the era，Make higher education with social political and economic life highly integrated，Unprecedented dependence on external participation and external resources，further eliminating the boundary between research universities and society。At the same time，The speed of knowledge innovation and the increase in global innovation cooperation and competition，It also profoundly affects the development of research universities that are innovative as a knowledge innovation。In the era of popularization of higher education and globalization of knowledge production，Global Research University generally faces two major governance problems。

First, the tension between academic development internal bet365 best casino games requirements and external accountability。The main governance task facing the current research university is to increase the intensity and speed of knowledge innovation，This requires the initiative and enthusiasm of academic producers，Give academic personnel greater academic freedom，Encourage more bold academic exploration; but the external accountability system for external pressure for university knowledge production，To a large extent, the development direction and development focus of research universities is limited，Limit the academic freedom and academic exploration of scholars。The definition of academic and academic value -added is constrained by external forces，The right to speak scholars is missing to a certain extent，Governance for knowledge innovation actually becomes a governance for external accountability，Departs from the core mission of the university。A contradiction between internal free exploration and external accountability，Become a major contradiction faced by the early research university in the governance。

Second, the tension between globalization requirements and local practice。Research universities entered a Bet365 lotto review global innovation and competition system in the era of popularization，Therefore, its response to the new knowledge production model and social accountability，All are in the context of global competition。Since the intersection of the century，Extremely out of various types of world universities fully illustrates this。As Clark Cole said: "A highly competitive real international academic community is emerging，This is the first time in history。If you want to walk into that circle，You must enter with your merits。"The formation of the circle standard allows the standard and imitation mechanism to produce effects in the global higher education field。Various World University rankings allow research universities，Including learning their governance mode; but any university governance，All products of the environment，Aquate to be subject to the historical and cultural tradition and basic rule of law，This makes learning often flow on superficial and formalize，Can't penetrate the fundamental。

Dual pressure in the internal and external parts leads to short -term target -oriented and performance management as the main feature of the current university governance，Quantitative methods are bet365 best casino games undoubtedly the most effective means to detect short -term goals and performance。The quality of talent training is simply equivalent to a student teacher、Employment rate and international students ratio，Teachers' appointment and evaluation have been simply converted into the number of thesis published、Number of items and winnings，Disciplinary level is quantity of the paper、Number of projects、Definition of the number of hats and funds，The success of the management and otherwise depends on the degree of implementation of these quantitative indicators。Breaking "Five Wei" is so touched today，Because "Five Wei" is not only an educational evaluation or academic evaluation problem，To a large extent, a superficial、Digue academic ecology and university governance status。

Current，Academic evaluation reform is the entry point and key to solve the problem of governance problems。Academic evaluation of Chinese University，It's not just an evaluation question，It is a problem of governance。Solving the problem of governance，Academic evaluation has also become an important starting point。Reason through academic evaluation，It can effectively cool the impetuous state of university governance，bet365 live casino games Promote the rationalization and modernization of university governance。Analyze academic evaluation from the perspective of governance，You can’t just start with evaluation methods and methods，And should discuss whether to comment、Why review、Who will comment。From the philosophical level of the problem，The answer is obvious: the fundamental goal of academic evaluation is not in the academic evaluation itself，Not in the bright and beautiful of various indicators and data，It is to achieve the school's tenet of a research university，The development of truly promoting academic productivity，Promoting the original innovation of knowledge and the cultivation of high -level talents。To improve academic productivity，It is necessary to fully mobilize the initiative and enthusiasm of universities and scholars，instead of forming constraints。

University move towards good rule，Need to ease the pressure that the external accountability brings to the university，Avoid universities from disregarding school laws and academic laws，Holding the nose by various rankings and external indicators。This requires rational rationality through reasonable authorization、Autonomous bet365 live casino games mature quality。Only with the quality of rationality and autonomy，University may be based on the time of the times，Consciously explore appropriate binding points in academic laws and social needs，instead of simply chasing flow with waves。

Scholars' independent scientific research，You need to transform the academic evaluation of performance into an innovative academic evaluation，Avoid standardization of academic evaluation、Tools and commodities。Academic evaluation should pursue the principle of simple and simple non -tossing，Ask a few more "why" before the evaluation，To create an academic environment with deep water flow、Mature academic community，And as much as possible from the complicated and complicated indicators and interests as much as possible，Explore high -profile knowledge for scholars and pursue the truth of the truth。

　Bet365 app download