The so -called "Wenwu First，Wuwu No. 2 "，The academic evaluation of philosophy and social sciences has always been a "boss difficult" problem。Its difficulties are mainly concentrated in two aspects: one is the relatively lack of "objectivity"，Different evaluations often have different or even different value judgments on the achievements of the same philosophy and social sciences，It is difficult to achieve value consensus，Especially when cross -door category、Academic evaluation of interdisciplinary disciplines，or the results of the evaluation itself are controversial。The second is that the academic evaluation needs to be completed by the subject of the evaluation.，and the evaluator itself is often limited in time and energy，May not be able to provide a "full sample background"，The study of "discipline convergence" and "discipline cross" is especially true。So，Where does the philosophy and social sciences and their evaluation go?

I think，Perfect of the academic evaluation system、bet365 live casino games Optimization of the institutional environment，On the one hand, it depends on the consciousness of practitioners，On the other hand, it depends on the further improvement of policies and regulations。The "Regulations on the Promotion of the Promotion of Philosophy and Social Sciences in Zhejiang Province" (hereinafter referred to as the "Zhejiang Regulations") issued in July 2022 in this area。"Zhejiang Regulations" proposed，"High School、Social science research institutions should improve academic quality、Social impact、The actual effect is the evaluation indicator of the measurement standard，Establish and improve the classification evaluation of academic achievements、Representative works evaluation、Third -party evaluation and other systems，Construction of scientific specifications、Open and transparent academic evaluation system "。So，How to build a scientific specification、An open and transparent academic evaluation system? Specific operational level，It should give full play to the research mechanism of peer review mechanisms in philosophy and social sciences、The leading role in the evaluation，Get rid of "only academic qualifications、Different bet365 live casino games Calendar、hat、Discipline、Only Project "is a bad tendency for。The research on basic theoretical research should highlight the academic evaluation of "small peer experts"，Explore the establishment of an academic evaluation system based on the "masterpiece" system; corresponding use and think tank -type research should highlight social benefits and consultation results.，Explore the establishment of an appraisal and think tank results evaluation system -oriented application of public service performance; popularization of social sciences、Application results，It should be explored and established social science popularization with communication effects and social benefits、Application results evaluation system。

With the continuous development of science itself，Employees in scientific research continue to increase，Cross and fusion between disciplines is becoming more and more extensive。The "Priles Curve" of literature measurement describes the law of the growth of scientific literature index，Synchronization with it is the continuous increase in the discipline、non -stop differentiation，so that science must be divided into "peers" as "big peers" and "small bet365 best casino games peers"。The "peer" familiar to the public，In fact, it is the "big peer" of the first and second disciplines under the subject category，and the third and fourth disciplines engaged in the "small peer" are conducive to the formation、Fine "Academic Community"。When the "big peer" cannot make accurate evaluation of the specific research of the rapid development of the third and fourth -level disciplines on many specific issues，To further improve the expert selection system，Make the results of the review and the expert more accurate，Ensure that the review opinions are more authoritative、Reliable。In recent years，The field of international scientific evaluation gradually emerges "small peers"、"Big Pass" supplemented by evaluation mode，Scientific research evaluation in the field of natural sciences in my country has also begun to pilot "Little Peer Comment"。For example，2012 my country National Natural Science Award for the first time conducted a "small peer expert" review pilot，further improves the scientific and authoritative nature of review。

Sollee，But "Little Payon Weight"。"Small Pass" often share highly subdivided discipline consensus、Theoretical preset、Basic issues and bet365 live casino games research methods，The so -called common paradigm。Common paradigm helps the commentary to truly understand the value and significance of specific research，to eliminate alienation of the review、Guarantee fairness and just。But，We should also see，Small peer reviews "There are usually disadvantages to over -prefer your narrow discipline or 'literati lightness"，Therefore, the value of other disciplines may be underestimated。In the book "Little Science · Large Science", Pois refers to the informal but close communication between scientists as "intangible college"，Share the common paradigm in the "Intangible Academy" and maintain a close and non -formal communication "small peers"，enough to form a "core exchange network"，It may affect the paradigm of specific disciplines。

Although the "small peer" review is not perfect，But its potential "only see the tree without seeing the forest" can be used to avoid the quantitative assistance of literature to maximize the avoidance。How to accurately find a sufficient number of "small colleagues" is a very challenging thing，Editorial for journal as a "academic goalkeeper"、The project funding committee is especially like this。bet365 best casino games Zhu Weizhu、Li Chunfa and others propose to use field ontology、Social network analysis and common word analysis and other scientific measurement methods to build conceptual knowledge network，to find a "small scientific community" with the same scientific context and scientific concept system，This is useful。However, the workload is very large、A large -scale "small peer evaluation" for hundreds of thousands to be reviewed by hundreds of thousands of review projects，It is still a big challenge，To this end, you can consider giving full excavation of the auxiliary functions of the intelligent system。

Introduction of "Little Peer Evaluation" in the philosophy and social science evaluation system，helps promote the further improvement of the peer evaluation system，Improve academic evaluation scientificity、Justice，To create a better academic atmosphere，Stimulate the enthusiasm and creativity of philosophy and social science workers。

　　bet365 Play online games