King Solomon was one of the rulers of the ancient kingdom of Israel，Because he is good at intelligently analyzing some difficult problems for bet365 mobile betting，And became famous throughout the kingdom，Regarded as a model of wisdom。Despite Solomon’s wisdom in handling the affairs of bet365 mobile betting，But when dealing with matters related to yourself，He behaved rather unwisely。Grossmann, a professor at the University of Waterloo in Canada, and Kross, a professor at the University of Michigan in the United States, named the above phenomenon Solomon’s Paradox，Means relative to solving self-problems，Individuals are better at solving other people’s problems。

　　What is Solomon’s bet365 mobile betting

Grossman and Cross first empirically verified Solomon’s paradox within the framework of interpersonal conflict。They found out，Compared to dealing with the interpersonal conflicts you encounter (hereinafter referred to as "self-conflict")，People show higher levels of intelligent reasoning when dealing with interpersonal conflicts experienced by bet365 mobile betting (hereinafter referred to as "bet365 mobile betting' conflicts")。That is, when dealing with self-conflict，Individuals often can only pay attention to their own position、Opinion、Needs and interests，Difficulty thinking about problems from different perspectives，Unwilling to make concessions and seek compromises，There is still a lack of foresight for future development，Only focus on the immediate causal relationship and interest relationship。These all limit the individual’s intelligent reasoning ability。The opposite，When dealing with conflicts with bet365 mobile betting，Individuals can transcend their own positions、Perspective、The influence of subjective emotions，Acknowledge the limitations of your own knowledge (intellectual humility，intellectual humility），A willingness to adopt a broader perspective of cognition；Aware of the uncertainty and dynamics of conflict，Tend to view current conflicts from a developmental perspective；Able to flexibly formulate plans based on dynamic changes in conflicts，Also tend to seek compromise solutions，To avoid further deterioration of the conflict。These can promote individual intelligent reasoning performance。

Actually，Solomon’s Paradox is not a new research topic，In previous studies, we can find a research topic that perfectly summarizes the phenomenon of Solomon's Paradox - the study of rational differences between self and others' bet365 mobile betting。Develop relatively mature research on the rational differences between self and others’ bet365 mobile betting，Belongs to the field of bet365 mobile betting psychology。Liu Cuicui and others reviewed relevant literature in 2013，It is found that this type of research mainly focuses on people's irrational behavioral tendencies in bet365 mobile betting of self and others，Including but not limited to loss aversion (being more sensitive to losses than gains of equal value)、Confirmation bias (tendency to support one’s existing beliefs、Consistent information assumed or expected)、Pre-decision distortion (distorting information to support one's own bet365 mobile betting), etc.。This result is still valid ten years later，Currently this type of research still focuses on people’s irrational performance in two types of decisions。Research on Solomon’s Paradox is mostly found in the field of wisdom psychology，Focus on the differences in people’s intelligent reasoning performance when dealing with self-conflict and conflict with others。These two research topics appear to be different on the surface，But intelligent reasoning behavior is actually a kind of rational behavior，People are subject to their own perspective、The inability to achieve intelligent reasoning due to factors such as position and subjective emotions is essentially an irrational bet365 mobile betting。It can be thought from this，Solomon’s Paradox also reveals the rational difference between self and others’ bet365 mobile betting，And Solomon’s Paradox is similar to the empirical results of research on rational differences between self and other bet365 mobile betting，It is found that people are not good at resolving their own conflicts or problems，And better at resolving conflicts or problems of others。

　　Paradoxes mostly originate bet365 mobile betting self-centeredness

Reasons for Solomon’s Paradox，Can be roughly divided into six points: reasons-based bet365 mobile betting assumptions、Difference in perspective、Interaction of positive emotions and situational self-transcendence、Self-construal type、Narcissistic personality traits、Intellectual humility。Among these six points，In addition to reasons-based bet365 mobile betting assumptions，The remaining five points are closely related to the concept of self-centeredness。Self-centeredness causes people to be immersed in their own opinions and emotions，Ignore important information in the situation and different ideas provided by others，Difficulty considering other people’s perspectives，And tend to stick to their own positions。These will inhibit people’s intelligent reasoning performance。As far as the last five reasons are concerned，First person perspective、Low context self-transcendence、High independent self、High narcissistic personality traits、Low intellectual humility will lead to self-centeredness，And the third person perspective、High situational self-transcendence、High interdependence self、Low narcissistic personality traits、High intellectual humility will promote ego-decentering，Thereby promoting intelligent reasoning performance。

First，Reason-based bet365 mobile betting assumptions。Proposed by Liu Cuicui and others，The rational difference between self and others’ bet365 mobile betting can be explained from the reason-based bet365 mobile betting hypothesis。specifically，According to the formula of general decision theory "Decision = Probability Theory + Utility Theory"，When making decisions for others，In addition to focusing on maximizing bet365 mobile betting results and positive emotions for others、Beyond minimizing losses and negative emotions，You also need to consider how to explain the rationale of your decision to others。This is not just to enhance the persuasiveness and credibility of the plan，To avoid responsibility and blame when making mistakes。In comparison，When resolving self-conflicts or problems，Individuals do not need to clarify and clarify the formation process and reasons behind the bet365 mobile betting plan。Therefore，When making decisions for others，People will be more cautious，Make decisions based more on rational thinking rather than subjective emotions，Promote people to intelligently resolve conflicts or dilemmas they encounter。

Second，Difference in perspective。Normally，When it comes to your own conflicts or problems，People mostly think from the first-person perspective，Easy to fall into self-centeredness，Unable to make intelligent reasoning。Different from this，When making decisions for others，People mostly use the third-person perspective，Long psychological distance，Often able to transcend egocentric bias，Promote people’s intelligent reasoning performance。Recent，Chen Qing and others are discussing the differences in bet365 mobile betting performance from different angles and ways of thinking in complex situations，Make it clear that although in decision making for self and others，People have an obvious tendency to choose perspective，But there is not a one-to-one correspondence between bet365 mobile betting situation types and bet365 mobile betting perspectives。The relationship between the two is，There are first-person and third-person perspectives in both self-bet365 mobile betting and bet365 mobile betting for others，And the bet365 mobile betting perspective of individual choice is crucial to the impact of bet365 mobile betting results，Even more significant than the decision type itself has a more significant impact on the decision outcome。When making decisions for others，Although people mostly use the third person perspective，But if other people’s bet365 mobile betting involves family members who are close to the individual、Partner or friend, etc.，Or the individual has high empathy，Be able to empathize with the difficulties and challenges faced by others，Or share values ​​and common goals with others，Then the individual will have higher emotional and psychological involvement，The bet365 mobile betting perspective will gradually shift from the third-person perspective to the first-person perspective。So，It is difficult for individuals to remain objective and rational，It is difficult to make wise decisions。At the same time，In decisions involving self-interest，If individuals can put the conflicts they face into perspective、Think and deal with difficulties and challenges as other people’s problems，That is, using the third-person perspective，It is more likely to provide higher quality solutions。Visible，This kind of self-detachment cognitive operation，Can effectively achieve self-centeredness，Thus effectively reducing the difference in individual performance between self-bet365 mobile betting and other people’s bet365 mobile betting，Reduce or even eliminate Solomon’s Paradox。

Third，The joint effect of positive emotions and situational self-transcendence。2022，Xu Wentao and others discovered through empirical research，The difference in positive emotions experienced by individuals in situations of self-conflict and conflict with others，Will affect their situational self-transcendence level，In turn affecting its intelligent reasoning performance。In other words，Positive emotions and situational self-transcendence play a chain mediating role between bet365 mobile betting type and intelligent reasoning level。In conflict situations with others，Individuals tend to experience strong positive emotional arousal、Weaker negative emotion activation，This effectively expands the individual’s attention、Scope of Cognition and Action，And improve individual cognitive flexibility，Promote individuals to form a cognitive mentality that transcends themselves，The ability to transcend one’s own perspective and emotional limitations，Beyond one’s own position、Opinions and interests。So，You can effectively achieve self-centeredness，And then improve the individual’s level of intelligent reasoning。Opposite，In self-conflict situations，The individual’s positive emotional activation is low，The level of situational self-transcendence is inhibited，Thus exhibiting a lower level of intelligent reasoning。

　Fourth，Self-construal type。An empirical study conducted by Wei Xindong and Wang Fengyan in 2021 showed that，An individual’s self-construal type plays a key role in Solomon’s Paradox。To be specific，Individuals with high independent self have clear self-boundaries，Emphasis on individual independence and personal interests，Pay more attention to your own needs、Goals and desires，Shows a strong egocentric tendency in bet365 mobile betting，Difficulty dealing with difficult self-related issues objectively，Leading to Solomon’s Paradox。Different from this，Individuals with high interdependence will not face or are less likely to face Solomon's Paradox。This is because，This type of individual has more flexible self-boundaries，Value the ideas and interests of others，Less self-centered，Thus when resolving conflicts and problems related to oneself，Can give a more sensible bet365 mobile betting solution。At the same time，Individuals with high interdependence will include important others into their own boundaries，In dealing with conflicts and problems of others，Susceptible to emotions and subjective biases，Thereby inhibiting the occurrence of intelligent reasoning behavior。From this，The difference in intelligent reasoning between self-bet365 mobile betting and other people’s bet365 mobile betting among individuals with high interdependence is reduced，Solomon’s Paradox phenomenon can be weakened or even eliminated。In addition，Not only the trait interdependence of the individual self，The same pattern was found when activating an individual’s interdependent self，Individuals with high situational interdependence are less likely to exhibit Solomon's Paradox。

　Fifth，Narcissistic traits of individuals。Wang Fengyan clearly stated in the book "Wisdom Psychology" published in 2022，The individual’s narcissistic personality traits also have an important influence on the emergence of Solomon’s bet365 mobile betting。The problem or conflict occurs within the individual，If the individual is too narcissistic at this time，It will lead to unlimited self-expansion，And the ability to reflect is reduced，Lack of basic empathy。This is a typical manifestation of self-centeredness，Hinders individuals from intelligently solving problems related to self-esteem and love。

　Sixth，Intellectual humility。Except for narcissistic traits，The book "Wisdom Psychology" also proposes another explanation of Solomon's Paradox，Intellectual humility。According to the article "Predictors and Effects of Intellectual Humility" published by Grossman's team，Intellectual humility refers to the ability of individuals to recognize the limitations and errors of their bet365 mobile betting knowledge and opinions。The problem or conflict occurs within the individual，If the individual lacks intellectual humility at this time，It is difficult to realize one’s bet365 mobile betting limitations，And difficulty respecting and accepting other people’s opinions。So，Not only do individuals not think about problems from other perspectives，On the contrary, the preference for one’s bet365 mobile betting perspective has increased，It is easy to fall into self-centeredness at this time，Causing Solomon’s Paradox。

　　De-egocentric: How to solve the bet365 mobile betting

Except for assumptions based on reasons，Self-centeredness is the core reason for Solomon’s Paradox。Because of self-centeredness，People are unable to rationally deal with conflicts or problems they encounter。Therefore，When considering how to solve Solomon’s Paradox，Can be cut directly from the perspective of de-egocentricity。In self-decision，If you can get rid of your self-centeredness，It can improve the quality of bet365 mobile betting to a certain extent，Weaken or even eliminate Solomon’s Paradox。

First，Adopt the perspective of a distant observer。When faced with life difficulties or life events that are closely related to oneself，Can adopt the perspective of a distant observer，Detach yourself from the authority，Treat your own predicaments or problems as those of others。This kind of self-centered cognitive mentality，It can effectively suppress or even get rid of the interference of an individual’s own subjective emotions and cognitive biases，Promote individual wisdom expression。Not only that，This mentality can also inspire individuals to generate new insights、Solutions and Creative Thinking，Then give a more informed bet365 mobile betting plan。

Next，Proactively seek other people’s perspectives and opinions。When dealing with self-related conflicts or problems，Individual before giving final decision，Can hold different positions with those、Active exchange of ideas and opinions with people，And deeply analyze the logic and arguments behind their opinions。Use other people’s ideas as radiation，Individuals are more likely to break away from the current situation，Examine and adjust your own ideas from an outsider’s perspective、Opinions and positions，To improve the quality of bet365 mobile betting。

　Finally，Carry out self-detachment reflection。In resolving conflicts and problems involving yourself，Insist on self-detachment reflection rather than self-immersion reflection，Continuously review your own views and positions to see if there are cognitive biases and subjective biases，Examine whether your emotional state affects the objectivity of bet365 mobile betting，Examine whether your thinking process is logical、Have all relevant factors been taken into account。Through these reflective processes，Individuals can increase the psychological distance from the current situation，Helps identify and correct one’s own cognitive biases、Subjective tendency、Emotional emotional deviation、Logical errors and bet365 mobile betting loopholes，Thus improving the quality of self-bet365 mobile betting。Generally believed，People can guide individuals to conduct self-detached reflection on their own bet365 mobile betting process through the following methods: 1，Targeted questions。For example，Have you collected enough available information？Do you consider the positions and ideas of others in conflict situations when making decisions？Part 2，Proactively challenge your own bet365 mobile betting basis、Thinking logic、Opinions and positions, etc.，Look for possible errors and inconsistencies。Third，Thinking in multiple dimensions。Try to examine your own bet365 mobile betting behavior from different angles，Consider your own views and interests as well as those of others，Consider the long-term and short-term effectiveness of bet365 mobile betting，Thus avoiding the limitations of thinking。These methods can effectively promote positive reflection in individuals，In turn, improve the quality of self-bet365 mobile betting。

　　(This article is a phased result of the National Natural Science Foundation of China project "Cultural Differences in Solomon's bet365 mobile betting and its Cognitive Neural Mechanism" (31971014))

(The author is a doctoral candidate at the School of bet365 mobile betting, Nanjing Normal University；Professor, School of bet365 mobile betting, Nanjing Normal University)