Recent，Mike Saffir, professor of science and technology communication at the University of Zurich, Switzerland. Sch?槌fer) and Niels Mede, a research assistant in the Department of Media and Communication, stated in an article published in the journal "Public Understanding Science" of Shizhe Publishing House，Compared to populist sentiment directly targeting politicians，The concept of science-related populism has not yet been clarified。They think，bet365 bonus code louisiana refers to，The antagonism of ordinary people who have a high evaluation of their own moral standards against intellectual elites who are considered to lack moral standards。

　The result of some public distrust of bet365 bonus code louisiana research

Safir and Mead emphasized，bet365 bonus code louisiana and other challenges to intellectual authority (such as anti-intellectualism、Conspiracy theory culture, etc.) have some overlap，But don’t confuse。Science populism is a variant of anti-science stance，It should also be distinguished from political populism。After a widespread wave of populism，This variant may become increasingly important。They said，Compared to political populism，bet365 bonus code louisiana can occur in all areas of personal and public life，Covers highly politicized topics (like climate change) as well as topics not directly related to politics (like nutrition)，The complexity cannot be underestimated。

Opinion poll、Experiment、Interview、Research carried out using discourse analysis and other methods have shown that，A considerable portion of the public distrusts bet365 bonus code louisiana research，This distrust is reflected in climate change、Vaccination、On various topics such as physical therapy。There is a likely link between populism and anti-science stances。There are research findings，Supporters of populist parties have low trust in universities。For example，Supporters of American populist politicians “trust the wisdom of ordinary people more than the opinions of experts and intellectuals”。In the populist worldview，Expertise is suspect。

But，The relationship between populism and knowledge production and dissemination has not been fully systematically studied。Shafir and Mead think，Academic circles have not yet carefully demonstrated that there are similarities with political populism，But there is also a crucial distinction between specific phenomena – whether bet365 bonus code louisiana has arisen。

　　bet365 bonus code louisiana popularity and influence

Safir and Meade said，bet365 bonus code louisiana and political populism are both "confrontations" between the masses and the elite。However，Because bet365 bonus code louisiana arises within the scope of the production and dissemination of scientific knowledge，The concept must therefore be epistemological rather than political、Understand from an economic or cultural perspective。Therefore，The core actors constructed by bet365 bonus code louisiana are “ordinary people with moral integrity” and people with intellectual authority。

In the concept of bet365 bonus code louisiana，The characteristic of "moral ordinary people" is common sense、Reliance on daily experience and even intuition，Common sense reasoning is what they think is the most reasonable or even the only reasonable mode of thinking。Common sense reflects the truth shared among ordinary people，Thereby strengthening group homogeneity。In the ideals of scientific populists，Science will not disrupt the order of life through unnatural innovations (such as genetic technology) and assumptions (such as climate science)。The intellectual elite is a subset of social elites including political elites，Have knowledge authority and be able to use organizations such as universities and scientific research institutions to participate in science-related decision-making，Includes scientific agenda、Research Methods、Publications, etc.。At the same time，Similar to other forms of populism，The intellectual elite is described as being detached from ordinary people’s lives and needs、Untrustworthy person。

　In the cognition of bet365 bonus code louisiana，The power that "moral ordinary people" should have is reflected in two aspects。First, decision-making power in the scientific field。For example，Some scientific populists think，Legitimate scientific research must bring immediate returns to taxpayers。The second is the power to define truth，Refuse to obey scientific authority。They think，Scientists’ knowledge production method relies on ivory tower theory、Detached from ordinary people’s daily experiences and perspectives，The legal subject who defines truth must be the general public。

Safir and Meade said，Future，Carry out empirical research on bet365 bonus code louisiana，Assess its prevalence in different countries or social groups，Study the sociodemographic factors or attitudinal drivers behind it，And what this tendency does to people’s cognition、Emotion、Influence on behavior and other dimensions，It will be of great significance to the mass dissemination of scientific knowledge。