Recent,Professor Mike S. SCH? FER), a professor of science and technology communication at Zurich University in Switzerland, and Niels Mede, a research assistant to the Department of Media and Communication, "Public understanding of public understanding at Shizhe Publishing House" Science presence published an article,Civilian emotions directly targeted at politicians,Science-Related Populism has not yet clarified the concept。They think,Scientific populism refers to,Apocalypse of an ordinary person who has a higher level of self -moral levels on the opposite emotions of intellectual elites that are considered lack of moral standards。
bet365 Play online games
Safir and Made emphasized,Scientific populism and other challenges to knowledge Bet365 lotto review authority (such as anti -intellectualism、Conspiracy theory culture, etc.),but not confused。Scientific populism is a variant of anti -scientific position,It should also be different from political populism。After experiencing a wide range of populist waves,This variant may become more and more important。They said,Compared to political populism,Scientific populism may appear in all areas of individual and public life,Covering highly political topics (such as climate change) and topics that are not directly related to politics (such as nutrition),Its complexity cannot be underestimated。
Public Opinion Survey、Experiment、Interview、Discourse analysis and other methods expand all the ways to expand,A considerable part of the public has no trust in scientific research,This kind of dislike is reflected in climate change、vaccination、Physical therapy and other topics。Positioning and anti -scientific positions Bet365 lotto review are likely to have contact。Study discovered,Ambulance party supporters have low trust in colleges and universities。For example,Supporters of American populist politicians "more believe in the wisdom of ordinary people rather than experts and intellectuals"。In the worldview of populist,Professional knowledge is suspicious。
but,The relationship between populism and knowledge production and communication has not yet been sufficient systemic research。Safir and Midd think,The academic world has not carefully demonstrated a similarity to political populism,But there is a specific phenomenon of key differences -whether scientific populism has risen。
Evaluation of the degree of popularity and influence
Safir and Made said,Scientific populism and political populism are "pairs" between the public and the elite。but but,Because scientific populism is generated within the scope of scientific knowledge production and dissemination,Therefore, this concept must be from the perspective of bet365 best casino games epistemology rather than politics、Economic or cultural perspective to understand。So,The core actors constructed by scientific populism are "moral ordinary people" and people with an authoritative authority。
In the concept of civilian civilianism,The characteristics of "moral ordinary people" are common sense、Daily experience and even intuition dependence,Common sense reasoning is the most reasonable and even reasonable thinking mode they think they think。Common sense reflects the principle of sharing between ordinary people,Therefore, the group is homogeneous。In the ideal of scientific populists,Science will not disturb the order of life through non -natural innovation (such as genetic technology) and vision (such as climate science)。and the knowledge elite is a sub -collection of social elites including political elites,With knowledge authority and can use organizations such as universities and scientific research institutions Bet365 app download to participate in scientific related decisions,Including the scientific agenda、Research method、Publications, etc.。At the same time,similar to other forms of populism,Knowledge Elite is described as out of life and needs from ordinary people、People who are not worthy of trust。
In scientific populist cognition,The power that "moral ordinary people" should have in two aspects。The first is the decision -making power in the scientific field。For example,Some scientific populists think,Scientific research with legitimacy must immediately bring returns to the taxpayer。The second is to define the power of truth,refuse to obey scientific authority。They think,The knowledge production method of scientists depends on the theory of ivory tower -type、Daily experience and perspective from ordinary people,The legal subject that defines the truth must be the general public。
Safir and Made said,Future,Empirical research on scientific populism,Evaluate bet365 Play online games its popularity in different countries or social groups,Study the social population factor or attitude driving factors behind it,and this tendency to cognition for people、Emotional、Behavior and other dimensions,It will be of great significance to the popular spread of scientific knowledge。
Friendship link: Official Bet365 app download Website of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences |
Website filing number: Jinggong.com Anmi 11010502030146 Ministry of Industry and Information Technology: Beijing ICP No. 11013869
All rights reserved by China Social Sciences Magazine shall not be reprinted and used without permission
General Editor Email: zzszbj@126.com This website contact information: 010-85886809 Address: Building 11-12, Building 1, Building 1, No. 15, Guanghua Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing: 100026
>