bet with bet365 newspaper’s comprehensive foreign media reports American scholars suggest measures to be taken in the academic publishing field，Prevent papers that have bet with bet365 from journals from being cited by other researchers。

According to the official website of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign on January 5，Jodi Schneider, assistant professor at the school of information science, found in a new study，A deceptive clinical trial bet with bet365 continues to be cited by other scholars 11 years after it was retracted by the journal，And the citation rate is higher than before being withdrawn。This bet with bet365 on drugs for respiratory diseases was published in 2005，Withdrawn in 2008 due to falsification of clinical trial data。2006-2019，This bet with bet365 has been directly cited 148 times，2542 secondary citations。Schneider analyzed the context of 112 of the direct quotes，Discovered that 96% of them did not mention that the bet with bet365 had been withdrawn。This illustrates the problem with the current digital library environment in providing information about whether a paper has been retracted。

According to Schneider，Most journals do not check whether studies listed in the references have been retracted when publishing a new article。On the one hand，Notices about retracted papers are often hard to find，Only a few websites and databases place paper retraction notices in a prominent position。On the other hand，The same article may be reproduced by multiple websites，But not every website will indicate whether this article has bet with bet365 by the journal。Also，There are many reasons why papers are withdrawn，Including errors or misconduct during research。But，Many databases do not include complete information about paper retractions，About 10% of paper retraction notices do not mention the reason for retraction。

Schneider analyzed the background of other scientific researchers citing the above clinical trial bet with bet365，for example，Do you know that the bet with bet365 has been withdrawn、Whether to use the bet with bet365 as the basis for your own research、Are you talking about the methods or results in the bet with bet365。After Schneider discovered that the bet with bet365 had been withdrawn，Studies that still cite the bet with bet365 and do not mention its retraction，41% described the bet with bet365 content in detail。Unlike most retracted studies，The citation rate increased significantly after the bet with bet365 was withdrawn，One reason may be that the bet with bet365 authors claim that this is a question that has rarely been studied before，The first randomized clinical trial。

Schneider said，The process of retracting a paper can be lengthy and involve an institutional investigation，The paper may still be cited during this process。The current information environment is conducive to the dissemination of scientific research results，But the news that scientific research results have bet with bet365 does not spread as quickly as the results themselves，Ignorance of the retracted paper、Unintentional citations may be a common phenomenon。Schneider has organized several workshops for academic publishers，Aims to discuss how journals can better review citations of retracted papers。Proposed by workshop participants，All retraction notices should be made public，Academic journals should establish conventions on how to mark retracted papers。

　　（Wang Youran/Compiler）