■ Lex Bott interviewees/Figure

Since the 1980s，Global scientific research investment increased sharply，The number of scientific researchers has increased significantly，The evaluation system related to this researcher is also attracted much attention。Recent，The head of the Scientific Integrity Office of Cape Puton University in South Africa Lyn Horn and the Amsterdam Free University Methodism and Integrity Professor Lex Bouter, the Dutch Amsterdam, issued a text name，The evaluation of scientific researchers must break the traditional quantity priority method，Thorough reform evaluation standards and practice，At the same time, it is necessary to take into account the needs of developing countries，Provide it with more support。This reporter interviewed relevant scholars on related issues。

　　Bet365 app download

Currently commonly used publishing indicators，such as the H index、Impact factor, etc.，Mainly the number of publications、Care frequency, etc. For statistics。Compared with traditional evaluation methods such as subjective peer evaluation，Such indicators can make relatively easy evaluation and comparison of scientific researchers，May be more objective、More time -saving。Norway Nordic Innovation、Professor Liv Langfeldt, a professor at the Institute of Research and Education, said，During the scientific research evaluation process，Publishing bet365 Play online games indicators are a factors that continue to play an important role，Can be able to scientific researchers、Institutions and related funding organizations make incentives。Especially in the field of humanities and social sciences，Researchers are in their resume、The promotion application and funding application to display various academic indicators is a common practice。

But，People gradually realize the negative effects of the indicator class assessment method on the scientific research system and scientific research results。This method pays more attention to quantity rather than quality，It will give birth to adverse incentives，Frequent issues of scientific research and practice。Hohn Example，Among them, the "Sausage Thesis" is one of the typical cases。"Sausage Paper" refers to a behavior that belongs to the same study and published one -time published in multiple papers，To reduce the research cost of scholars，Increase the number of papers and the number of references。

Under the formulating scientific research evaluation method，Scientific researchers can increase their performance by increasing the number of papers，But this will greatly suppress potential pioneering research。Professor Warwick Anderson, Professor of Monash University, Australia, said，Impact factor dominates university、How to evaluate scientific researchers。This standard is not very scientific，Because even in a journal with the highest influencing factor，Some papers have never been cited by other researchers。Especially in the field of health and medical research，Scientific researchers must not only Bet365 lotto review consider the impact factor of the journal when publishing a paper，Also allows the paper to face the most suitable reader，As much as possible to have a greater social influence，It is best to affect the decision -making of public health policy makers，instead of only staying at the level of academic influence。

　　Avoid falling into the plunder journal trap

Another，The pressure on publishing articles is also easy to cause scientific researchers to fall into the trap of plunder journals。This type of journal uses the eager mentality of scientific researchers，Usually skipping peer review and other processes，Quickly release research results，As a result, a large number of low -quality or even false papers are published。Sioux McKenna, the person in charge of the Graduate Research Center of the University of Rodis University in South Africa, said，Pundable journals not only do not follow the quality guarantee process in academic publication，It will also charge high fees for articles publishing，Researchers from some developing countries have become the key goals of such journals。

McKenner pointed out，The main reason for this situation is that academic publications are closely related to performance evaluation or scientific research funding，Some scientific researchers will take risks to take shortcuts。Many South African scholars are like this，In order to fight for national subsidies，Tired of publishing papers，instead of creating knowledge as the mission。From the current point of view，African countries contribute to the creation of international knowledge very small，Africa's knowledge creation ability needs to be improved，Cultivating Bet365 lotto review this ability is by no means that it can be achieved by supporting the scientific research of individual personnel，You need to change the overall scientific research evaluation culture。

A number of scientific research assessment culture beyond quality，It makes some scientific researchers believe in the commitment of predatory journals。But related research shows，Research on the proportion of articles published in the dense university published in the plunder journal，greatly lower than other types of universities。This indicates，Having a powerful scientific research culture is the key。

　　Find more alternative methods

Bute said in an interview with reporters，The attention point of the current literature measurement index is too narrow，And the academic community has gradually realized this problem in the past few decades。Evaluation of scientific researchers should start from the academic behavior of scientific researchers，Including increasing transparency、Implementation of accountability system。Another，There are also some consensus on scientific research assessment，Scientific researchers can also become an excellent mentor、Can provide high -quality peer review reports、Constructive members of the research team、Enhance the social correlation of your own work、Able to conduct scientific research with the public。

The evaluation standards and practices of scientific researchers need thorough reform，Not only should we pay attention to "quantity"，Pay more attention to "Quality"。From Hohn and others,，Except for scientific research tasks in the strict sense of scientific researchers，Also need bet365 live casino games to complete peer review、Training guidance, etc., etc., etc., etc., and other important matters that are beneficial to improving the quality of scientific research，But currently，These matters have not been fully valued。

Horn thinks，To evaluate the whole process of researchers from the concept to the specific practice，Covering the development of the concept of research、Research Design、Method Theory、Execution and effective communication，Researchers should be accurate、Research process of transparent display and report。We must pay attention to open scientific practice，If an open method、Materials and data; attach importance to more extensive research and academic activities，If you copy、Innovation、Translation and integration; attach importance to a series of other contributions of researchers to responsible research and academic activities，Like the evaluation、Training、Academic Exchange, etc.。

When evaluating scientific researchers，You must recognize equality、The importance of diversity and inclusive。Bute told reporters，Many scholars firmly believe that the evaluation of scientific researchers should be flexible，Evaluate it according to the specific situation and standards。Members have more prominent performance of scientific research teams with complementary skills and complementary academic backgrounds，Therefore，Evaluate according to the role and contribution of individual researchers in the team。other，In addition to evaluating personal，Evaluation of the research team also helps to measure the overall level of the research department of an institution。Bute Suggestion，bet365 live casino games To obtain information from relevant researchers from multiple sources，Like a trip (colleagues working at the same level)、subordinates (such as being directed) and managers (such as department heads)。

　　Pay attention to the needs of countries in low- and middle -income countries

No doubt，The current evaluation method of scientific researchers should indeed change。Bute representation，For scientific researchers in high -income countries，Some criteria in the evaluation of scientific researchers，You also need to pay extra time and resources。Take the attention of open science as an example，Scientific researchers cannot do it with their own strength。They need enough infrastructure、Skills、Fund and even training support for specific disciplines，to ensure their data to find、accessable、Published by collaborative operation and reusable way。

But for many scientific researchers from low -income countries，Meeting the above principles may be a challenge that cannot be overcome。Australian Flindis University Humanities、Professor Claire Smith, a professor at the School of Art and Social Sciences, said in an interview with this reporter，Scientific researchers are the main force participating in scientific research evaluation，Therefore，Professional training for it is very necessary。Scientific researchers from institutions from resource insufficiency，May lose more opportunities because it cannot keep up with changing international needs。

Smith thinks，The international cooperation projects carried out around scientific research evaluation are also critical。Funders and heads of scientific research teams from higher -income countries must Bet365 lotto review make efforts，Support the development of scientific research systems in the regional scarcity of resources。