In recent years，Health in the world、Climate、Energy and other problems appear frequently，Scientific discovery and daily life present a high degree of correlation，People from all countries can be more intuitive through news media or other ways、Convenient to understand the scientific discovery related to yourself，At the same time, you can also express your opinion on scientific discovery more directly。In this environment，News media has changed the consistent practice of scientific research in public space。At the same time，Scholars of Natural Science and Social Sciences also regard the correct scientific news as their responsibility。How to actively fulfill scientific communication obligations around how scientists、Promoting the scientific spirit、Improving issues such as the quality of the whole people，Our reporter interviewed relevant foreign scholars。

　bet365 Play online games

Preprint refers to the purpose of scientific researchers for the purpose of communicating with peers，Volunteer publishing on the Internet has not yet been reviewed by peers、Research works that have not yet been published。During the epidemic，The academic and the media has added reprints and reports to the pre -printed book。Luisa Massarani is a scientific communicator at the Institute。2021，Massarani and others surveyed the European region、North America、Latin America、Asia Pacific region、Middle East and North Africa regions、633 scientific reporters from south of the Sahara Desert and South Africa report on the epidemic report。Studies show，67%of the United States and Canadian journalists and 69%of European and Russian journalists have reported pre -printing books during the epidemic。

Researcher Alice Fleracker, a researcher at the Academic Exchange Laboratory of Simon Fraser University in Canada, said，More and bet365 Play online games more reporters will be regarded as the sources of novel scientific research results that are easier to obtain during the epidemic period。Pre -printed book allows reporters to bypass the lengthy peer review，Discover the latest scientific discovery in time，Relieve the people's urgent sense of crisis。But，If a reporter analyzes the angle of the pre -print book, it deviates from the original intention of the scientist，Not only will you misunderstand scientific research information，It will also cause serious public consequences。

To explore how the epidemic changes the reporter's search、Verification and dissemination of scientific research pre -print methods，and how scientists perform the new responsibility of communication science，Freanker and others in Canada in March 2021、Reporters from 19 reports from the United States and Europe have interviewed health and scientific news.。Flry Lank discovered，Most reporters lack the professional knowledge that has not verified research that has not yet been reviewed by peers。Different media institutions verify、Clarifying and spreading pre -print methods and standards are very different。pragmatic，Some reporters strive to practice the information verification standards of scientific press and publishing，For example, invite third -party scientists to objectively judge pre -print research。but，Many reporters in order to meet the period of submission for several hours or days，greatly reduced the steps to verify the results of scientific research。Freank thinks，Some reporters confuse the definition of pre -printing books and formal research，Not to mention the difference between the readers in the context,。

During the epidemic，The public is accurate、Demand of scientific information that is closely related to policies，Let more scientists realize the significance of participating in scientific research reports。Flry Lank discovered，Reporters who are interviewees hope to play the role of educators or interpreters，Allow reporters to track interviews。But，Researchers' contribution to scientific research reports，Not only adding bet365 best casino games contexts or by acting as a "source of information" to make research legalization as simple。Freanke observation thinks，The new cooperation model between scientists and reporters is more like a partnership with serving the public as the common goal。This work requires scientists to understand the time limit of the reporter; use academic background to help reporters verify their scientific reports; in the research method、Discovery and other aspects to avoid using talked or hype。other，Scientific researchers should also take full into account the social impact of research，Especially the relationship with public needs。

Flirak talks，Facing the politicalization and fragmentation of the Western media ecosystem，Scholars from different cultures and regions need to unite，Therefore, it accurately spreads more valuable scientific information; the healthy development of society depends on this。Therefore，Flirak appeal，Scientists should readily help the media spread the correct scientific information，Establish a pre -printed report style and specification with reporters，Open more cross -industry cooperation，While strengthening the popularity of national science，Reduce the relevant risks of pre -printing reports。

　　Update the scientific quality measurement index of the whole people

Researcher at the University of Sydney, Australia, Yala N. Golumbic (Yala N. Golumbic) proposed，Non -scientist groups when they communicate daily and speak on the Internet，Frequently unable to thoroughly、Correctly understand the concept of science。2017，Professor Priti Shah, a professor of psychology at Michigan University，In addition to mastering objective scientific basis，Personal beliefs、expectations and emotions also affects the public about hygiene in life、Decisions for the problems of nutrition and vaccination。Therefore，Thinking about how people exposed to scientific concepts and applied scientific information from the perspective of the public。

The Western academic community invented the concept of "scientific literacy" in the 1950s，It refers to under the situation such as daily bet365 Play online games life and citizen problems，Individual sexual and knowledge that individuals realize scientific participation。But the previous scientific literacy survey focuses on evaluating the public's scientific knowledge reserves and views on scientific issues，Ignoring the public's understanding and use of scientific information。Professor Baruch Fischhoff at the Department of Engineering and Public Policy of Carnegelon University in the United States and CAITLIN DRUMMMND, Caitlin Drummond, doctoral researchers，"Scientific reasoning" ability is everyone to understand scientific methods、Prerequisite for evaluating the quality of scientific research，It is an indispensable part of the scientific literacy national survey。2017，Philiphoff and others through their own scientific reasoning table，Test whether a person holds a belief in consistent with scientific consensus when facing controversial questions，ability to analyze scientific information。

2022，Colombic is based on the results of Fishhoff and others，Developed the scientific reasoning capacity of individuals in the context of measurement of daily life。This scale contains 11 scientific concepts (single -blind and double -blind、Confusion variable、Confusion variable、Scientific consensus、Construction effectiveness、control group、Ecological effect、History、Random allocation、reliability and reaction bias)。Subsequent，Colombic and others used this scale to investigate the scientific reasoning ability of some Israel population; experimental objects need to determine the right or wrong of the statement covering the above scientific concepts。Research results show，The higher the education level of the respondent，The better the daily scientific reasoning ability。Colombic thinks，This discovery is consistent with the content of the "2018 Science and Engineering Index" published by the Australian National Science Foundation，That is, people with a high degree of education have more scientific knowledge，More interested in science，The possibility of participating bet365 Play online games in scientific activities is also greater。

Colombic also found，The scientific reasoning ability of the respondent has nothing to do with academic majors。This indicates，Regular scientific education does not significantly improve personal daily scientific reasoning ability。Colombic said，Scientific education focuses on teaching students' scientific knowledge、Cultivate scientific skills，instead of emphasizing the complexity and uncertainty of science。The scientific knowledge covered by textbooks is often with students' off -campus experience、Life and interest have nothing to do with，Therefore，It is difficult for students to find opportunities to use scientific knowledge。Colombic also speculate，Interviewees who have received general education can use logical thinking and other abilities to infer basic scientific concepts。This can be seen，Volkswagen's scientific reasoning ability seems to be built through exposure to academic thinking，instead of being cultivated in scientific classroom。For this，Colombic said，The use of scientific and technological concepts and principles in life scenarios is not only conducive to spreading scientific facts to the public，It can also encourage the public to express scientific basis on controversial issues。

　　Build a public communication paradigm for social science

Researcher Andy Bartlett, Researcher, Britain, told reporters，Current，Social science professional knowledge has suffered many slander in the public field，The legitimacy of the discipline is threatened。Although some scholars believe that distorting science facts are the characteristics of the so -called "post -truth era"，But in the eyes of Bartilite，There has never been a "golden age" that sociologists can participate in public and political debate without considering risks。

Batlite Discovery，When the public discusses a topic that is a subject of social sciences，Rarely to give discipline experts as the privilege status of the proposed and interpreter of the topic。Batlite talked about in the interview，Most British newspaper column authors who have bet365 best casino games no professional background are writing crimes、Unemployment and education issues are rarely referred to the opinions of social scientific experts，Although the latter uses its entire career to study and solve these issues。You can be sure，The same column writer will not publish discipline insights on natural science without consulting experts。Batlite thinks，This media style has dissolved the special characteristics of social science research，equivalent the professional knowledge of sociologists with the prejudice of others。other，The "flat" phenomenon of social science professional knowledge not only reduces the quality of public debate，It also limits the ability of social science to improve policies。

More and more social sciences think，I have the responsibility to make the public contact the fine social science knowledge，At the same time, guide the public to expand the method of seeing problems from the perspective of the subject。but，​​Social Science and Natural Sciences have large differences in epistemology。Batlite thinks，Social science needs to develop different public communication paradigms，Cultivate a unique social science and public understanding system。Bartilite said，Social science research involves the subject，instead of object。The subject constitutes social，It is composed of society。Definition to social science is based on this situation，That is, social scientists can understand a social group with interaction with their members。The knowledge proposed by social sciences often discuss more directly how people should organize、Management、Improve society，This is closely related to everyone’s daily life。Volkswagen can，I also think that I can put forward reasonable knowledge propositions on the problems and objects in the field of social sciences。

Bartlite Suggestion，Scholars in the field of social sciences actively practice "responsible boundary work"，Cultivate an environment that is more suitable for retaining the voice of the masses，At the same time, open a proper space for public communication of social sciences，Actions bet365 live casino games to challenge any weakening of expert status or make professional knowledge losing the particularity。"Responsible Boundary Work" is not to reduce the legitimate interpretation of social science issues，Instead of adding the confidence of social scientists。This kind of understanding is not just "perspective"，It has been based on the strict scientific research and professional participation of the knowledge system for decades。Betlite believes，As long as each scientist does enough，"Responsible Boundary Work" will become the fields controlled by social science institutions and academic communities。