Constructing grammar research that is consistent with the actual bet365 sportsbook review language
August 11, 2020 08:53 Source: "bet365 sportsbook review Social Sciences Journal" Issue 1986, August 11, 2020 Author: Xiong Zhongru

Since its inception, bet365 sportsbook review grammar has been deeply influenced by Indo-European grammar。Late 1930s,Wang Li and other scholars began to consciously break away from the constraints of Indo-European research habits,Explore the grammatical rules of bet365 sportsbook review itself。From a global perspective,The view that requires getting rid of the Indo-European perspective has been around for a long time。Descriptive linguistics at its inception,Calling people to get rid of traditional linguistic concepts and methods,That is, getting rid of the Indo-European perspective to highlight the personality of the language。Later generative grammar,It is even more demanding to get rid of the Indo-European perspective to highlight the commonality of languages。But to this day,Lu Jianming、Scholars such as Shen Jiaxuan still write articles calling on the academic community to get rid of the influence of Indo-European perspective in the study of bet365 sportsbook review grammar。In the study of bet365 sportsbook review grammar,There are probably two ways to get rid of the Indo-European perspective,First, highlight the language personality,The second is to highlight the commonality of languages,In the final analysis, we should conduct research based on the bet365 sportsbook review language。

  Highlight bet365 sportsbook review personality

Highlight the language personality to get rid of the Indo-European perspective,It is a valuable legacy of descriptive linguistics。Gong Qianyan said in his "History of bet365 sportsbook review Grammar": "Since "Ma Shi Wentong",bet365 sportsbook review grammar is mainly influenced by European linguistics,But around the 1940s,The influence of American structuralism (descriptive linguistics) has strengthened。”This is probably from 1936,In this year,Wang Li published "A Preliminary Study on bet365 sportsbook review Grammar",The article points out that "our research on the grammar of a certain language,It is not difficult to compare another language to prove similarities,The difficulty is to find the differences between the native language and other languages ​​​​of the world","Our most important work from now on,Care about striving to find the characteristics of bet365 sportsbook review grammar”。This article is viewed from the perspective of linguistic history,In fact, it is the earliest echo of the proposition of descriptive linguistics。

Published "Beijing Colloquial Grammar" by Zhao Yuanren (translated by Li Rong),It has had a profound impact on modern bet365 sportsbook review grammar。As my country’s first comprehensive application of descriptive linguistics methods to study bet365 sportsbook review,It goes against the traditional approach: when analyzing sentences,The direct component analysis method (analytic hierarchy process) is used,Instead of the traditional center word analysis method;When determining the subject and object,Based on positional relationship,Instead of the traditional giving and receiving relationship;When dividing parts of speech,Based on the combination relationship between words,instead of traditional syntactic components。"Modern bet365 sportsbook review Grammar Lectures" by Ding Shengshu and others and "Grammar Lecture Notes" by Zhu Dexi,They are also masterpieces of applied descriptive linguistics,are the two peaks of bet365 sportsbook review descriptive linguistics。After several major grammar discussions and continuous research,The basic theories and methods of descriptive linguistics have gradually become the mainstream theory of bet365 sportsbook review grammar,such as distribution theory、Word order theory and analytic hierarchy process, etc.。

With distribution theory,You can more consistently divide bet365 sportsbook review into categories of speech。If you think that parts of speech are reflections of morphology,Then bet365 sportsbook review has no parts of speech,Because bet365 sportsbook review nouns have no number form,Verb has no aspectual form,Adjectives have no grade form。In order to speak good grammar,bet365 sportsbook review scholars have been exploring suitable methods,If using meaning or dividing speech categories based on sentence components。After distribution theory,Zhu Dexi further pointed out in his "Grammar Questions and Answers" that there is no simple one-to-one correspondence between bet365 sportsbook review parts of speech and syntactic components (commonly known as sentence components),And regard this as the characteristic that distinguishes bet365 sportsbook review from Indo-European。

With word order theory,The syntactic components of bet365 sportsbook review can be determined more consistently。If you think that syntactic components are reflections of morphology,Then bet365 sportsbook review has no syntactic components,Because there is no nominative case in bet365 sportsbook review,No accusative case,There is no subject-predicate agreement either。In order to speak good grammar,bet365 sportsbook review scholars usually determine the subject and object based on the relationship between giving and receiving。After word order theory,It has become the norm in bet365 sportsbook review that the subject-predicate structure serves as a predicate。Zhu Dexi pointed out in his "Grammar Questions and Answers": "When comparing with Indo-European,It is an obvious feature of bet365 sportsbook review grammar that the subject-predicate structure can be used as a predicate。”

Although these studies have achieved great success,But it is far from and difficult to escape the shackles of the Indo-European framework。The reason is very simple,Personality is revealed through comparison,Without comparison, there is no individuality。And Indo-European,Especially English,Scholars are more familiar with it,Naturally used for comparison。So,Shen Jiaxuan pointed out,Starting from "Ma Shi Wen Tong",Scholars want to get rid of the Indo-European research framework、The effort to find the characteristics of the bet365 sportsbook review language has never stopped,In the process of getting rid of it, I was unconsciously pulled back。

  Pursue bet365 sportsbook review commonality

Pursuing language commonality,It is the reaction of generative bet365 sportsbook review to descriptive linguistics。Although generative bet365 sportsbook review and descriptive linguistics have many opposing ideas and opinions,But one thing is the same,They are all aimed at getting rid of the "Indo-European perspective",Just the path is different,A language that highlights personality,A highlight of language commonality。Highlight language personality,Theoretically, there will be no vision for other languages;Highlight the commonality of languages,There is no perspective on other languages ​​in theory and practice。

Generative bet365 sportsbook review is the pursuit of language commonality,Abandoned dependence on form since its inception。such as part-of-speech questions,The mainstream approach to generative bet365 sportsbook review is to register it in the vocabulary as a specific attribute of a word,For example, the term "person",The mainstream approach to generating bet365 sportsbook review is to register it as a noun in the lexicon,But we don’t investigate why it is a noun instead of a verb。like subject、object,It’s just a concept of structural relationship,As long as it is in a certain structural position,It is some kind of syntactic component。

The most revealing,It is the "case" in generative bet365 sportsbook review。In common cognition,Lattice is regarded as a manifestation of form。But in a generative bet365 sportsbook review,Lattice is also called abstract lattice,It doesn’t matter whether there is any form or not。This breaks through the limitations of Indo-European。In order to check the grid,Chomsky, the founder of generative bet365 sportsbook review, also introduced the light verb theory,Light verbs can have no morphological or even phonetic expression。After the light verb is raised,Light nouns and so on were also proposed immediately,Scholars proposed distributed morphology on this basis。Distributed morphology believes that entity words are roots in the lexicon,No part of speech,The part of speech is composed of light verbs in syntax、Determined by light nouns and other categorical components。

Let the entity words exist as roots in the vocabulary,Do not mark parts of speech,This statement almost goes back to Gao Mingkai’s theory of “substantial words without categories”。The difference is,Distributed morphology believes that the entity words of all languages, including Indo-European, have no part of speech in the lexicon,But it will eventually get the part of speech in the syntax。The categorical component is a light verb、Functional morphemes such as light nouns,It doesn’t matter whether they have phonetic forms or not,Any phonetic form is an affix。Separate morphology from words,It is also a consistent practice to generate bet365 sportsbook review。Chomsky proposed the affix jump rule in his famous work "Syntactic Structure",It is to separate the word and the attached affix,It is only glued together through the affix jump rules in syntactic operations。

  Build research based on bet365 sportsbook review language

Get rid of the Indo-European perspective,We must base ourselves on bet365 sportsbook review,We need to open the door for research again,Actively absorb and learn from new international achievements。

Based on bet365 sportsbook review,You can also gain insights。Zhu Dexi’s description of the characteristics of bet365 sportsbook review grammar,From the perspective of commonality,Also correct。The first characteristic is that there is no one-to-one correspondence between bet365 sportsbook review parts of speech and syntactic components,The second characteristic is that the construction principles of bet365 sportsbook review phrases and sentences are basically the same。From the perspective of generative grammar,These two are common features of languages,i.e. all languages,Including bet365 sportsbook review and Indo-European,There is no one-to-one correspondence between the parts of speech and syntactic components,The construction principles of phrases and sentences are basically the same。The reason is very simple。In generating grammar,Phrases rather than words serve as syntactic components,The parts of speech are the grammatical categories of words,There is no correspondence between parts of speech and syntactic components。Language calculations all use merge and shift operations,Both operations must comply with local restrictions, etc.,So the consistency of construction principles,It is also the commonality of languages ​​rather than differences。The difference between languages ​​lies in the morphosyntactic characteristics of functional categories,For example, bet365 sportsbook review tense categories,It has no inflectional form,So there is no grammatical consistency requirement for predicate verbs in bet365 sportsbook review;It has no mandatory subject characteristics,So there is no virtual subject in bet365 sportsbook review,The subject can usually be omitted。The two grammatical features specified by Zhu Dexi are both based on bet365 sportsbook review facts,So not only applicable to bet365 sportsbook review,Also for Indo-European。The reason why Zhu Dexi regards it as a grammatical feature of bet365 sportsbook review,Because he did not adopt the conversion operation in generative grammar。Internationally,Conversion operations are not universally accepted either,There is no "unique criterion" yet。

Whether it is Ma Jianzhong、Li Jinxi,Still Zhao Yuanren、Wang Li、Lu Shuxiang、Zhu Dexi,No one will leave the academic forefront of the time。They are all examples of open-door research,So we can always keep pace with the times。Domestic scholars should get rid of the Indo-European perspective,To a large extent, it means getting rid of the grammar of morphological language。1970s,Lu Shuxiang emphasized that the grammar of morphological language cannot be used to explain bet365 sportsbook review,The international academic community also holds this view。In generating grammar,Whether it is its early theory or recent theory,Metropolitan peeling form,So the parts of speech do not need to be determined based on morphology or distribution,Syntactic components do not need to be determined based on morphology。

Get rid of the Indo-European perspective,Whether it is to highlight your personality,Still highlighting the commonalities,Both should be based on bet365 sportsbook review facts,Sound the voice of China。Any time,You can’t do research behind closed doors。

  (This article is a phased result of the Beijing Social Science Fund Project "Cartographic Analysis of the bet365 sportsbook review Left Boundary" (19YYB014)

(Author’s affiliation: Department of Linguistics, Beijing bet365 sportsbook review and Culture University)

Editor: Zhang Yueying
二维码图标2.jpg
Highly recommended
Latest article
bet365 sportsbook review

Friendly links: Official website of bet365 sportsbook review Academy of Social Sciences |

Website registration number: Beijing Public Network Security bet365 sportsbook review. 11010502030146 Ministry of Industry and Information Technology: Beijing ICP bet365 sportsbook review. 11013869

All rights reserved by China Social Sciences Magazine. bet365 sportsbook review reproduction or use without permission is allowed

Chief editor’s email: zzszbj@126.com Contact information of this website: 010-85886809 Address: Floor 11-12, Building 1, bet365 sportsbook review. 15 Guanghua Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing Postal Code: 100026