Collapsed "My Thinking" -the question of the "standard mode" of philosophical research
August 20, 2019 09:28 Source: "China Social Sciences" Journal of Social Sciences, August 20, 2019 Author: Shang Jie

Descartes' "I think I am" as a conceptual theory constitutes the standard mode of today's philosophical research。It contains a lot of meaning that seems to be self -evident,But they are suspicious。

First,"I" here does not refer to personal,but refers to everyone,Points to universal,It ignores the absoluteness of the difference between people、Unrelated、Cut yourself、Privateness、Selfless、Unopened。

Second,"I think" is also true,In fact, it is not "I think" but "we think"。It establishes an abstract subject、A thinking mode that uses general concepts for logical deduction,Promotion of Classical Philosophy of Germany,It has become the standard mode of academic papers so far,Its distortion can be clear from the so -called "academic norms",For example, when the author of the article expresses his point of view,often not use "I think" and "we think" as the logo。Why are you afraid of "I"? Why does "I" do not meet the so -called "academic norms"?、Personality、Scenes and other difficult images and even physical factors,These factors are often highly sensitive,Not subject to the constraints of concepts。

third,"I think I am" on the surface similar to a logical inference: I am thinking,I can't doubt that I'm thinking,In order to think,Must bet365 Play online games exist。but,This is a fake inference that has been disguised。"I think I am in" the proposition of the proposition is preset as "concept",It is nothing more than considered in A、B、C、D concept,Have a logical relationship with each other。The reason why I say it is not a logical inference,It is because it does not meet the standard of interpretation logic,That is, "I am" is not a full -scale jurisdiction that can be fully attached to the jurisdiction of "I think"。The 20th Century Psychoanalyst can refute the Descartes: "I am in the place where I don't think。”

fourth,It formally established an object -type thinking mode,"I think" = subjectivity,"In" = The existence of the conceptuality of being thought,The so -called thinking object。So,From the beginning of Cartesh,Sibonusa and Leibniz,until German classical philosophy,Model of the Main and Optical Apocalypse、Systemic philosophy,For the first time in the history of Western philosophy、Established on a large scale。German ideology ascended the peak in the early 19th century,But it is a lazy ideological method,It's just an empty thinking form,Cut differently and complicated thoughts and life phenomena into a simple "opposite unity" mode for thinking,If subjective and objective、Reason and perceptual、Occasionally and inevitable、Good and evil,etc.。

Fifth,In "I think I am in",Descartes' so -called "general suspicion" has serious design ingredients。Because of the meaning of "me", "thinking", "bet365 live casino games in",Before the general doubt is performed,Descartes already know,He just pretended not to know,Then perform some thought operation。In other words,The tradition of rational philosophy he created by him,In fact, it is from "I know" or from "(already) possibility" (equivalent to inevitable),instead of starting from "I don't know" or "impossible"。

In postmodern philosophy,"I think I am" is just a conceptual conclusion (it becomes the fundamental turning point of modern western philosophy、Coordinate system、Ideological Hub、Departure point) instead of "Original Thinking" that Nietzsche appealed。As a ideological facts present,"I think I am" how did I appear? In the process of appearance,What key thought elements have been deleted? These ideas are earlier than "I think" as the concept,Due to the deletion of these original spirit,Make "I think" a simple meaning、Naked、The stance of the empty hole,Pure thinking form,Even a ideological label,The specific manifestation is after it,Philosophy completely reduced to "Explanation",The argument between philosophers,It's just a position in the above context。

If you want to return to the "love wisdom" tradition of philosophy,It is to be surprised by the proposition that seems undoubted,Questions on Skills in the theory of theory,Raise to him the most important question: You have already set the existence in advance,"I think" looks like your new discovery,In fact, it is just an example Bet365 app download of the existence,and you are regarded as the only example。So,Why do philosophy must think from existence rather than nothing? Existence is present,But nothing is not present -this is the key to the problem。

When I say that nothing is the original or "things itself",The expression is not accurate,It may even cause misunderstandings or refute,Because this kind of expression is like an established philosophical proposition,Therefore, I refute myself。This is because I can only express thoughts in words,In some substantial sense,Language is not a good tool for expressing thoughts。In order to "make" as much as possible ",I have to change the nature of the philosophical language,Let it change from proof or inference to the description of the original thought,Specifically: "I think",Even if I really think,But I just immersed in the process of thinking,No need to use a conclusion ("I think") to summarize it。In this process,time or instant、occasion or plot、A series of spiritual and material factors such as unconscious or behavior is mixed together,Can't talk about distinction。In these circumstances,Rather than saying "I think", there are many faces,It is better to say that "I think" has collapsed (eliminated、disintegration or deconstruction)。

So,The key is that I no longer use "I think" to summarize the following philosophical problems,These problems cannot be explained by concept: I can't express it clearly bet365 live casino games and accurately. I see (Feel、Experience) things,This is not my ability to express,Instead, the language encounters its own boundary。When I believe it can express,I'm self -deceiving,When I say that the root of the tree is black,"Black" the word "black" quickly stretch it,Black cannot replace tree roots,There is no "black" on this tree,It is another thing。In other words,Eyes itself (Ear、Body organs) I have intuitive ability,No need to use words。The boundary of the media existence,As "this leaf is green",But this sentence is not green,Black words written on white paper。Unopened、Can't explain to people,Not intentional concealment,Instead, I don’t understand when others say,It returns the true nature of freedom,That is privacy。still personal、I、Pure differences、Some subtle spirit。

Conceptual theory ignores writing style,It leads to the same or one thousand people,Its speculation "style" is equivalent to canceling the style,Because it only cares about the correctness of the concept,The material form or emotional form of expression (style form: dialogue、Prose、Novel、Drama) It seems not important。

Asymmetric、Non -Center、Unexpected thought、Temporaryness、Purely accidental, etc.,All these are the specific links of the real occurrence or appearance of thought,Whether in specific living behaviors,Still writing、Lecture、In the conversation,Can't really implement bet365 Play online games a established principle、Center Thought,They are actually stitched by the ideological behavior or temporary encounters after another。

Traditional philosophy teaches us,Only in the world has not yet recognized (solution、Understanding) Question,No unknown questions。Under this premise,Philosophy is equivalent to intelligence。When philosophy said "free imagination",It is also regarded as a question of epistemology or knowledge that is limited to intelligence,Its keywords are "inevitability" and "possibility",It excludes the "freedom" revealed by Kant,That is the boundaries of knowledge、Impossible,Put "God exists、Free will、The problem of the soul is immortal "to give the position to religious beliefs。but,Traditional religion is "blind faith",No room for intelligence or criticism。The exotic problem of thought regards "freedom" as a philosophical problem,instead of religious issues。Where the philosophy stops in Kant,As a new starting point for philosophy,Philosophers start thinking about "impossible possibilities",Philosophy is no longer equivalent to knowledge theory。This transformation has the meaning of the times,Because humans are facing philosophical problems caused by artificial intelligence,Thinking bottleneck in order to break through this severe problem,I have to start thinking from artificial intelligence,Philosophy open the border to art,Talent that opens the deepest humanity。

 bet365 Play online games

Editor in charge: Zhang Yueying
QR code icons 2.jpg
Key recommendation
The latest article
Graphics
bet365 live casino games

Friendship link: Official website of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences |

Website filing number: Jinggong.com Anmi 11010502030146 Ministry of Industry and Information Technology: Beijing ICP No. 11013869

All rights reserved by China Social Sciences Magazine shall not be reprinted and used without permission

General Editor Email: zzszbj@126.com This website contact information: 010-85886809 Address: Building 1, No. 15, House, No. 15, Guanghua Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing: 100026