In recent years，The mystery of free will also inspires the interests of scientists。Some scientists put forward some new opinions based on new scientific discovery，Among them, the most influential is the famous experiment of American neuros scientist: The subject is not stimulated or forced by the outside world during the experiment，All bend your hand with voluntaryly。Experimental results found，When the instrument records the neural activity of some parts of their brain, it is about 350 milliseconds，The subject only reported that they had a conscious intention to bend the hands，After 200 milliseconds, it was only recorded in the outbreak of hand muscle activity。Libeite Explanation，Since the subject has the unconscious neural activity of the brain first，Then there is a conscious independent decision of the bending side，Visible conscious intent can not start voluntary behavior。Although he did not deny the existence of free will，But many who do not compat with the theory think，This milestone experiment proves that human behavior depends on the causal chain of neural activity，Free will is just an illusion。

From a scientific perspective，Libeite's experiments are undoubtedly successful，Later, I got repeated verification。But from the perspective of philosophy，His explanation is failure，Bet365 lotto review I did not see that this experiment proved exactly the opposite fact: the free will is to start voluntary behavior in various cause and effect chains inside and outside。The factor caused by failure is the freedom and inevitable dual opposition architecture that always exist in the history of Western philosophy。Because Libett understands the freedom of freedom as the first start of the first，As a result, Kant explained the example of "absolutely spontaneously standing from the chair" for Kant，The ins and outs that cut off the behavior of the subject，Treat a sequence he himself also admits as "not happened": "The subject agrees to obey several instructions of the experiments，One of them is，The subject is expected to engage in the specified muscle movement at a certain time after the experiment starts。"Once this actual pre -sequence is included in the scope of inspection，The incident is clear: the subjects of the subject bent at will indirectly from the instructions of the experimenters，Among them, it even vaguely contains compulsory，That is "you should do it instructions，Otherwise, there is no need to participate in the experiment "。In fact，Later, Ribet also wrote in a book，Before the beginning of the experiment，"The subject thinks she is responsible for this action"。No need to talk about，This sense of responsibility can only come from the instructions that the subject agreed to obey: I should bend my hand at will in the experiment，Bet365 app download Otherwise, it will disappoint the expectations of the experimenters，To bear the responsibility that the experiment is not completed。

As long as you notice this first sequence，We can re -explain Ribet’s experiments，Explain how freedom will work: when the subject agrees to obey instructions，"Need to Want" in the heart that "bending in the experiment at will"，and stay in memory。then，At a certain point in time after the experiment,，The psychological need to be produced beforehand is first inspired the subject's neural activity through some kind of unclear physiological mechanism，Then they realized that they thought they wanted to bend the hands，Finally, the voluntary action of the curved hands was completed through the outbreak of the muscle activity of the hand。This，The integrated causality chain contained in the experiment is actually: 1. Experiment issued instructions before the experiment。2. The subject of the subject accepts instructions and forms the needs of the random bending side。3. The instrument recorded the brain nerve activity of the subject in the experiment。4. The subject reports that there is a conscious intention to bend the hands of the hands。5. The outbreak of the instrument records to the subject's muscle activity of the subject。In other words，Here is the original initial cause of the voluntary behavior of the subject of the subject，It is neither the conscious intention they want to bend the hands in the experiment，Not some parts of their bet365 live casino games brain have previously enhanced neural activities，but the kind of "need -want" that they have formed before they accept instructions before the experiment.。

In this way，Libeite's explanation is just unlobilized out of the latter three links of this chain，Pay attention to the sequence of the subject's neural activity and conscious intention，Therefore, the experimental data of "neural activity precedes the intention of consciousness"，A one -sided conclusion that "free will cannot launch voluntary behavior"，However, he did not see his experiment successfully showing a more complicated fact: the free will of the subject is in the causal chain of "related needs -memory retention -neural activity -conscious intent"，and only with this overall chain can we start the voluntary behavior of their random bending hands。Things are very simple: If the subject did not form a specific needs in advance under the stimulation of the experimental instructions，Why are they in the experiment that the nerve activity of some specific parts (rather than other parts) in the experiment has begun to enhance，Then I just realized that I want to bend my hands (rather than other behaviors) for a specific thought，Finally, this specific action (rather than other behaviors) was completed through the outbreak of hand muscle activity? Briefly，If there is no conscious need for formation in advance，How can the subject just want to engage in the pre -designated action specified in the experiment? From a scientific bet365 Play online games perspective，Acknowledge the inevitable effect of causality of this ring and one ring，Isn't it a reason that there is no reason to assert that the subject's brain nerve activity、Absolutely spontaneously enhanced more convincing?

Introduce a daily case here as a supplement，May help us understand this new explanation: Zhang San booked a train ticket to travel for the next morning，Therefore, the needs of "should get up at six o'clock in the morning" before going to bed and remember it in my heart，Even the alarm clock，But at 5 o'clock the next day, I didn’t wait for the alarm clock，I woke up "self -spontaneously"。If Zhang San sleeps, there are also instrument records，It will also give it to the neurological activity enhancement that first has him，Then realize the data you wake up。but but，Could it be that we can assert，Not a conscious need formed before going to bed that night，but neural activity in the middle of the night, so self -enhancement，Do he wake up almost in his sleep?

Actually，Many scientists and philosophers point out when commenting on Ribet's experiments，His explanation ignores the important role of the instructions in advance。But，Not only does Rabitter re -explain their experiments，These critics are just emphasized by this point: Now that the subject agrees to obey the instructions of the experiments，So their behavior is not based on free will。This opinion once again reflects the distortion effect of freedom and inevitable bet365 best casino games dual opposite architecture: as long as it is affected by any factors，People’s will is no longer absolutely spontaneous，Therefore, it is no longer free。But according to this standard，There will be no free will in the world，Because like the subject's "want"，Any "want" people will always be affected by various reasons internal and external，It is impossible to produce from nothingness。Say we wear，The meaning of "from yourself" is not to say that it is not affected by any factors，Instead, even if it is affected by various factors，In the final analysis, people are still out of their own "want" (including "want" in the situation of "have to").。

From a scientific perspective，another misunderstanding of Ribett and its critics due to philosophical misleading is，They just pay attention to the sequence of neural activities and conscious intentions，But if you close your eyes like Kant, you do n’t look at the actual first -line sequence of “related needs -memory retention — neural activity”，As a result, in -depth in -depth inquiry from the well -designed scientific experiments to retain the consciousness in the memory of the memories of how to activate the brain in unconsciously，Let it be implemented through the conscious intention that people subsequently realize。In this sense,，Freedom and inevitable dual confrontation architecture not only allows philosophers to fall into despair on the issue of free will，and also allows scientists to miss a good opportunity on the issue of exploring bet365 live casino games the relationship between neural activity and consciousness。

bet365 live casino games