"Complete Works of Marx and Engels" History Edition 2 (hereinafter referred to as "Mega2") Part 2 Total 15 volumes 23 volumes，Published since 1976，All out of 2012，presents all the existing gestures in the field of political economy since the end of the 1850s in the field of political economy，and many versions of independent academic value in "Capital"、Editor's draft of Engels，provides unprecedented rich literature support for related research in this field。Publishing with Mega2 literature，German scholars rely on mother tongue advantages，Make full use of new information，I have proposed a lot of new views，Drive the relevant research in the international academic community，Research on our deepening of Marx's political economy criticism is meaningful。

In terms of literature support，MEGA2's second part of the contribution is mainly in two aspects: on the one hand, the first publication of a group of economics manuscripts，Including "Gold Measurement Machines" and "Political Economics Criticism" written in 1857-1861; many contents of "Period of 1861-1863 Economics Manuscripts"; "The Economics Manuscripts of 1863"; " Capital 2、dozens of manuscripts of different parts of volumes; supplementary modification of the manuscript of the "Capital theory" from 1871-1872。On the other hand, the representative version of "Capital" and the independent publication of the editor's manuscript，Including 6 representative versions of Volume 1，2、3 volumes of the official version，Marx's original manuscript and Engels editor's draft，Provides favorable conditions for comparative studies。Based on these new documents，For the past few decades，German scholars have gained research progress in the following aspects。

In the staging of thought，Based on the second part of Mega2, the ideological process of the criticism of Marx's political economy was rebuilt。Mega2 The second part of the first part of the "Capital" bet365 Play online games and its preparation text，The hidden premise is，Economics research on the late Marx is all classified as the writing plan of "Capital"。But the promotion of literature publishing has changed the view of many people。Mega2's second part of the editor's main person in charge Carl-Erich Vollgraf proposed，Take 1863 as the boundary，The relevant text of Marx belongs to the two writing plans of "Political Economics Criticism" and "Capital"，And the "Six Volume Plan" related to the former is more a publishing strategy expression，Marx did not intend to achieve this plan during the creation of "Capital"。This view has received a lot of support，Some scholars have sorted out and the formation of formation of different types of text、Analyze the method of eliminating the concept of "capital general"，provides support for this view。The current head of the Mega2 project, Hubman also proposed，Publishing certificate of the second part，There is neither one completed "Capital Theory"，You cannot understand all Marx's economics manuscripts as a prepared manuscript for "Capital"。Different ideas from the beginning of publishing，Mega2 Part 2 finally records an unfinished research process，Marx always involves new research objects，Try a new discussion method。In short，MEGA2 part of the second part shows Marx on the basis of fully grasping the first -hand information and real dynamics，Continuous deepening research around key issues，Never for the needs of publishing progress and system construction，Easily exploration process of conclusion，Reflected the scientific and openness of its thoughts。

In text positioning，Make new academic judgments for several important documents in MEGA2's second part of MEGA2。Ingo Stützle proposed，The "Outline" written in 1857-1858 is a Marx "self -understanding text"，Not for publication，It is not the key to the later "Capital Theory"，but has its own independent theme，The point of view is also staged。Michael Heinrich divides the "Capital theory" that began in 1863 into three stages: 1863-1865 is the first and 2、3 volumes of the first manuscript; 1866-1871 is a revision of Volume bet365 live casino games 1、Phase 2 of Volume 2; 1871-1881 is the third draft stage。"Theoretical History" question about the 4th volume of "Capital"，Mega2 literature indicates，Marx has never written this book。Therefore，"The Theory of Residual Value", which was once independently published in the past, was generally believed that it should be placed in the "Economics Manuscript 1861-1863 Economics"。

In the theoretical method，Based on new literature，More clearly reflect the relationship between Marx's political economy critical method、Logical traits。Wolfgang Fritz Haug proposed，The place where Marx surpasses Li Jiatu is，He pointed out that value is not a physical attribute of a single product，Instead of the "common thing" in the exchange relationship of plural products，Analysis of the relationship between goods constitutes "philosophical essence" behind Marx's economics。Helmut Reichelt, based on "Political Economics Criticism", "First Draft", etc.，Marx criticized the abstract control of the subject in the form of conceptual analysis，His scope of value as "thinking" reflects the process of transforming the product into a value object。Dieter Wolf disagree with this，He pointed out through the comparison of various versions of Volume 1 of "Capital"，Marx distinguishes the thinking abstraction under the theoretical perspective and the relationship between the product in reality，The former cannot cover the latter，This is also the place where Marx surpasses Hegel's dialectics。Hans-Georg Backhaus (Hans-Georg Backhaus) puts forward an objection to the "simple product production" view of Engels in Volume 3 of "Capital"，The goods he thinks that Marx's discussion is not a historical premise of capitalist production，but always in a capitalist society，Marx does not do an experienced historical analysis，but logical dialectical analysis。

In terms of theoretical content，Based on new literature，Value theory of Marx、Crisis theory and other new research。In terms of value theory，First, the critical connotation contained in the concept of "labor -like" and "abstract labor" is explained by philosophy，Highlights bet365 best casino games its transcendence of the theory of labor value of classical political economy; the second is to re -understand the role of two links in production and exchange on value formation，Reflection of physicalism of the value of the product in the past; the third is to use the "value form" as the core，Reconstruction from the theoretical logic of the criticism of the commodity to the criticism of the bidding education，Innovation and interpretation of issues such as the episodes of capital logic。In these respects，"Neue Marx-Lektüre) The most representativeness，In view of the length of this article and the previous existing topic introduction，No more expanded here。In addition，Bertram Schefold, who wrote an introduction to the MEGA2 version of "Capital", integrated the main point of view of the past Marx value theory research，Putting value form theory in the multiple assumptions of the multi -assumptions of different economic genre actors，The theory of proposing value form is neither absurd nor the truth，but an analysis method，A "ideal type"。He criticized Marx's political economy as "uniformity caused by value form theory"，In this theoretical building，Analysis of goods and value is "foundation"，Exploitation theory、Production of absolute and relatively surplus value、accumulation and circulation constitute "pillar"，Remaining value to profit、Interest、The conversion of land rent and the formation of income is "Dome"。Value form theory not only play a role in the initial product and value analysis，Until the problem of value conversion to price in Volume 3 of "Capital" still plays an important role，Because Marx is a proof of this，Profit is just the resurrection of surplus value。In terms of crisis theory，Heinz D. Kurz compares the multiple manuscripts involving related topics，Explain that Marx's point of view does not form a consistency ending conclusion，Including the law of average profit margin decreased，and judgment on the development trend of capital institutional development。Christoph Henning regards the above laws as the core of the Marx crisis theory，The Bet365 lotto review reason he believes that people suspect this law is to "translate" Marx's theory into a completely different paradigm and other paradigms such as neoclassical economics，or do not recognize the problems faced by Marx。From the background set by Marx，His model still has explanation to this day。Herfried Münkler combined with a large number of natural scientific research in Marx，The relationship between the relationship between Marx's natural science research and the research of "Capital"，The core is whether Marx intends to deepen the understanding of the limits and laws of capitalism through natural science research。but but，He himself did not give this conclusion。

On the issue of the relationship between Marx and Engels，Mega2 Part 2 provides rich new materials for research in this field。Hainrich thinks，As far as "Capital" is concerned，Can't simply think that Marx is the author，and Engels is the editor。For example，"Did Marx really write a chapter about the theory of crisis，Or do he want to deal with the problem of crisis trends at different levels of abstract discussions，We don’t know "。But Engels used a large length to highlight this theory。Taking the theory of credit as an example，Marx once explicitly expressed，The description of the credit system beyond his plan，But Engels relatives this statement of Marx，Therefore, credit theory is included in Volume 3 of Capital Theory。Some letters in the late Marx also indicate，The unfinishedness of "Capital" is not only reflected in the aspect of quantity，It is also reflected in the quality aspect，There are still many new economic phenomena that failed to get a complete study。Regina Roth thinks，Hainrich's point of view contains assumptions，That is, Marx will narrow its point of view。She emphasizes，Engels is very cautious about the word "law" often appearing in Marx's manuscripts，He only talked about the discussion of all cases in the introduction paragraph, "You can get the rules of profit margin from it"，What should be or can be regarded as "laws" and finally handed over to the reader to explain。In short，"Engels didn'Bet365 app download t freely、I did not use a strong pen to change Marx's text，Instead of doing this work carefully "。It can be found out，Understand the relationship between Marx and Engels in the second text of Mega2，Always associate with scholars' criticism of major criteria and even fundamental methodology for scholars。Another example of this aspect is，Michael Kr? 觌 TKE proposed，Engels's understanding of "Capital" although it contains historical characteristics，but did not distort Marx's original meaning。Marx understands capitalism as an open、with a specific historical premise、Not absolute system，Future with internal power mechanism and possibility。Therefore，Engels understands the logical narrative of Marx from the concept and history of Marx，Not a solution。and Ingo Elbe believes，Kleterk puts forward good arguments to refute the accusations of Engels in the past，But he was immersed in a plan that was immersed in the backbone of Engels，The major differences between Marx and Engels in terms of methodology and themes。He emphasized，The narrative of the logical system contains historical content，But this does not mean that the logical systemic analysis of historical content can be converted into a historic analysis。History contained in the systemic association of capitalist production methods，Is an inner history，is a "restricted" historic dynamics。Visible，Many scholars discuss the differences between Marx and Engels' thoughts，Not to understand the theoretical system of Marxism，but to deepen the understanding of its theoretical content and method itself，Activate the contemporary potential of related ideas。

In short，Since the 21st century，Especially since the financial crisis，The research on the criticism of Marx's political economy criticism in the German academic community has shown a different nature from the 20th century Western "Marxology"。Most of the scholars who are concerned about MEGA2 are not to distort Marxism's image、Decision of Marx's ideological value or Editor's contribution of Engels，Instead of investigating the development process of the critical thinking of Marx's political economy、bet365 best casino games Comparison of different versions of works and manuscripts differences，The philosophical wisdom of historical materialism、Methodism of criticism of political economy is liberated from the fixed image of "Capital" and the original dogma understanding，To respond to contemporary capitalist issues。In recent years，Some of their academic achievements have gradually affected domestic research。As long as we adhere to Marxism's position and method，Science、Open mentality reasonable use of MEGA2 related documents，You can get out of the traditional understanding of the destination argument，Reconstruction of Marx's political economy criticism in the research of ideological history，Lay the foundation for achieving higher levels of academic dialogue and reality analysis。

(Author Unit: Zhejiang University Urban College)