Outstanding Honorary Professor Benjamin Cohen, an outstanding honorary professor at the Department of Political Science at the University of California, San Barbara, "The Book of International Political Economics: History of Discipline Thought"，Whether it is helping us to understand the 50 -year historical context that this subject has formed and developed in the West，Still watching China ’s international political economy (IPE) construction，All have positive significance。The book has two distinctive features，First, the first system discussed Bet365 lotto review the American school and British school of IPE，The second is the ideological course of the founder of the subject、Original concepts and propositions are discussed in content。

　bet365 best casino games

This book thinks，Contemporary IPE research has distinctive national characteristics。Before and after the international financial crisis in 2008，Scholars on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean have made many contentions around the development status of IPE，Cohen banner clearly proposed the two -point method of American schools and British schools。A significant feature of the American school is national centralism，But the British school thinks，The state is just a category in the behavior that can affect the rules of the game，Social Power、Economic classes and other private powers have a great impact on international political economy。

The differences between Bet365 lotto review the American school and the British school are not only reflected in the former paying attention to quantitative analysis and empirical research，The latter focuses on the study of qualitative and interpretability。other，American schools rarely pay attention to developing countries，and the main research issues are concentrated in the trade and currency fields。

The British school is just the opposite of the American school，The development issues associated with the issues of poverty and inequality should be placed at the top of IPE research。U offendation of global development has extremely important political and economic meanings。From the beginning，The British school will resist the definition of IPE as an international relationship in the United States school。From the perspective of the British school，IPE should become a academic learning，Not just a small major in political science。To show this difference，Scholars of British school even tend to use "global political economics" to replace the title of "international political economics"。The reason for this differentiation is extensive，According to Kon’s understanding，Different personality of the discipline founders on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean is one of the reasons，But deeper power is rooted in the international status difference between the United States and other Western countries。

　Three -generation scholars and seven founders

Cohen has experienced the division of three generations of scholars in the British and American IPE development in the book，It has been generally accepted by the academic community。The main basis for its division is the time for scholars to obtain a doctorate degree，Among them, most of the second generation obtained a doctorate degree in the Bet365 lotto review 1980s，For example, Jeffrey Freyen, who studies international financial relations from Harvard University, USA、David Lake, the University of California, San Diego, advocated "open economic and political science"、Princeton University focuses on Helen Milner, who studies international economic relations from the perspective of "domestic politics"。The third generation was mainly obtained from a doctorate degree in the 1990s，For example, Michael Hshs Cowks, who obtained a doctorate from Harvard University in 1997。

Cohen mentioned the contribution of third -generation scholars in a few places，The whole book mainly discusses the first generation of scholars who promoted the formation of IPE in the 1970s and 1980s，Susan Strang in the UK、Robert Cosks in Canada、Germans and Americans Peter Kazantein and four Americans Charles Kingsurberg、Robert Gilping、Robert Kioha and Stephen Krasine and other seven people。The initial discipline training background of these scholars is both economics (such as Kinglberg and Strangi)，There is also history (Cowker)，But most of them are political science，Visible，Politicians live in the dominant position in IPE research。

　Eight books and five articles

The above seven people have the discussion that is sufficient to represent the characteristics of this discipline、Original concept，and also closely linked with major propositions that promote the development of the discipline。As a discipline，The beginning of the study of contemporary IPE is Strangqi's 1970 article "International Economics and International Relations: A Case of Connection"。Strangqi later distinguished "structural power" and "connection power" in the book "National and Market" published in 1988，The latter is the concept Bet365 lotto review of power usually defined in political science，That is, A forced B to do what B did not want to do through power，"structural power" is the power to determine the method of doing things。In international political economy，"Structural Power" is usually associated with the name of Strangqi。

King of the Lord in 1973 "The World: 1929-1939" published by Kings In 1973 proposed that the operation of the international economy and monetary system requires leadership，This assertion was later summarized as hegemony stability theory。Golderberg participated in the Marshall Plan，This experience has an important impact on other academic research，So that Kon believes that "the theory of hegemony is just the Marshall Plan that has expanded"。1975，Gilping proposed the three models of political and economic relations in the book "Transnational Company and the United States Hegemony" -realism、Liberalism and Marxism，This category is still in use today。The article "Structure of State Power and Foreign Trade" published by Klasna in 1976，Open is very likely to appear in a period when hegemony state is at its peak，It is the order of power and the country's policy，Otherwise, the world will be confused。

Beyond realism，The development of liberalism is also attractive。Kuhan and Joseph Nai published in 1977 "Power and Mutual Dependence: World Politics in the Transformed".，Re -outline the new characteristics of the world: multi -level and different in communication、There is no decline in the importance of grade and military forces between issues。Clasna's book "International Mechanism" edited in 1983，Various understanding of game rules that ensure that cooperation can achieve mutual benefit models。The concept of "international bet365 Play online games mechanism" is accepted by IPE scholars，and further summarized in the book "After the hegemony" published by Kiohan in 1984 as "cooperation without hegemony is possible，Cooperation itself can be realized through the international mechanism "。

The original concept of Kazzstan is "domestic structure"，and improved in the book "between power and prosperity" edited in 1978。Kaszstan thinks，If there is no systemic analysis of the domestic structure，It is impossible to understand international political economy，This effort actually enhances the understanding of how domestic and international interaction in the analysis of international relations。In this regard，The most familiar international political economy community and overflowing to other discipline areas are two original concepts，That is Peter Gunovic in 1978 in the article "The Underworld Second Mirror: the International Roots of Domestic Politics", "The Underworld Image"，and Robert Patanan in 1988 in the "Double -Layer Game" model built in the article "Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: the Logic of Double -Layers"。This is actually the fusion development of the two major problems of the country's behavior and the governance of the international system level。The influence of Marxism is mainly reflected in the concept of "world order" built by Cox，The paper published by Cowker in 1981 "Social Power、National and World Order: Beyond the theory of International Relations，Not only the difference between "problem solving theory" and "criticism theory"，and repeatedly emphasize that all theories have the purpose of purpose.。

Eight books, including "International Political Economics: History of Disciplinary Thought"，and the above five articles constitute the cornerstone of international political Bet365 app download economy。Original concepts proposed by these works、Discussion on the causal mechanism and the argument of major propositions are to promote IPE as a long -lasting driving force formed by the discipline。

Of course，There is also a certain shortcoming of this book。First, insufficient representative。Due to the works of the English world，Kon himself also acknowledged that a major disadvantage of the book is to ignore the non -English world，Especially the research results of scholars in non -Western world in the field of IPE，This shortcomings have improved in its 2022 monograph "Receiving International Political Economics"。The second is that the balance between generations is not enough。The main length of the book of Cohen is concentrated in the first 20 years，that is, the development and changes in the late 1970s and 1980s，that is, IPE as a discipline to form an initial condition。But the discussions of development between 1990 and 2008 are relatively weak，This part is actually the most popular Chinese scholar，Because this is the key 20 years formed by the construction and development of China's IPE discipline。Third, the book extensively shows the differences between Britain and the United States，But the intergenerational heritage and intergenerational disputes are not described in depth enough。In fact，Kiohan、Cohen and other older scholars call on American schools to study more about big problems，And believes that a second -generation scholar represented by "open political economy" brings an IPE research into a astray，But the second generation of scholars do not agree with Kon’s judgment，For these differences，The discussion of this book needs to be strengthened。

(The author is a researcher bet365 live casino games at the Asia -Pacific and Global Strategic Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences、Director of the Research Office of the Great Power Relations)