The seminar on “Generative bet365 sports Intellectual Property and Legal Governance” hosted by the Data Law Institute of China University of Political Science and Law was recently held in Beijing。Experts attending the meeting focus on intellectual property protection of bet365 sports products、Discuss topics such as the utilization and protection of training data。

The participating scholars held a heated discussion on the intellectual property protection issues of bet365 sports products。Professor Cheng Xiao of Tsinghua University Law School proposed from the perspective of civil subjects，The so-called recognition of intellectual property rights in works created by bet365 sports，Essentially, it still gives existing civil subjects civil rights such as copyright。Based on different interests considerations，Rights may be given to developers of bet365 sports products，may also be given to users (i.e. users)，The resulting infringement liability shall accordingly be borne by these entities。Zhang Xinbao, Professor of Law School of Renmin University of China thinks，bet365 sports developers or providers should have rights，Because bet365 sports developers or providers mainly obtain benefits through fixed user use。In addition，At this stage, bet365 sports does not have the status of a civil subject。Proposed by Zhang Ping, Professor of Peking University Law School，Concerning the copyright protection of bet365 sports-generated content, there are two main issues: the nature of the work and the ownership of the author’s rights。The confirmation of copyright owners of bet365 sports-generated content is diverse，Completely controlled by the user，Copyright belongs to the user，Completely generated automatically belongs to the developer or investor，Can be agreed through contract、Determine the ownership of rights through delegation and other methods。Cui Guobin, professor at Tsinghua University Law School thinks，bet365 sports system user in single text entry，Usually unable to claim corresponding rights and interests。This is because user contributions mainly consist of providing complex text commands，And bet365 sports may display multiple responses。Only if the text instruction is clear enough，Develop a clear visual concept or element，When building a concrete picture for all readers，Only users can make creative contributions，Thereby giving copyright to bet365 sports generated products。

Proposed by Zhang Linghan, Professor of Data Law Research Institute of China University of Political Science and Law，Whether to grant copyright to generative bet365 sports，Similar to the legal protection issues of virtual property。Whether it is gaming equipment or generative bet365 sports，Significant contribution to existing machines or the entire network operating environment，There is also intelligence provided by humans、Time、Energy Support。When demonstrating whether virtual property should be given exclusive protection，Theoretical frameworks such as Locke’s labor empowerment theory can be used to analogize the copyright of generative bet365 sports。Zhang Xinbao thinks，The issue of copyright use in large models should be based on the principle of open use，Paid or unpaid depends on the scenario、User type、Determined by model type。Cannot stick to the idea of ​​copyright protection，It is necessary to analyze the changes in the interests of stakeholders during the transition from knowledge economy to digital economy，Make up the losses and benefits。

Article 3 of the "Regulations on the Implementation of the Copyright Law of the People's Republic of China" clearly stipulates，Creation as referred to in copyright law，refers to the direct production of literature、Intellectual activities in artistic and scientific works。Wang Qian, a professor at the School of Intellectual Property of East China University of Political Science and Law thinks，To determine whether the content generated by bet365 sports is a work，First of all, it should be clear what creation is as defined by copyright law。“Direct generation” means that people directly decide the expressive elements that constitute a work based on their free will。People can use creative tools，But the authoring tool does not participate in the decision-making process of expressive elements。