"The digital economy is the future development direction of the world"，The development of the digital economy has reshaped the world economic development pattern，An important impact on the international political and economic system，Treating technology、Trade、Deep changes in many aspects such as finance and security。In the face of new changes in traditional global economic governance，my country urgently needs to use its own advanced advantage in the digital economy，Grasp the initiative of the game in the new round of global digital economic governance、The right to discuss the right to speak and rules，Promote global digital economy governance。

　　bet365 Play online games

With the development of digital economic activities，Global wealth growth rapidly，But the problem of inequality in development is even more serious，The construction of digital infrastructure in developing countries、Digital technology use and the acquisition of digital resources、Treatment and creation is far behind developed countries，It has led to serious global digital gap problems。At the same time，The global popularity of the new crown pneumonia has caused a huge impact on the economy of various countries，Global Digital Gully Problem further intensified。

At this stage，The expression and influence of the digital gap are different from the past，New challenges brought about the over -fitting of globally。On the one hand，"Accession Gully" gradually turns from "quantity" to "quality" inequality。Looking at it vertically，At present，Master the low -end parts of digital technology。But looking horizontally，Through broadband technology and second -generation Internet、The continuous upgrade of facilities such as cloud computing，Digital technologies in developed countries have already gone a qualitative leap，and its blockade of core technology and monopoly international standards，The development of digital technology in developing countries continues to deteriorate，"Quality" Honggou continues to pull the Grand。On the other hand，"Use Global" and "Power Gully" more and more prominent。The update iteration speed of digital technology is getting faster and faster，And developing Bet365 app download countries citizens due to their average education level is low、Insufficient supply of digital skills training，The breadth and depth of the use of digital technology lags far behind citizens of developed countries。and with the improvement of digitalization of production and life，The acquisition of digital resources、The ability to deal with and create is becoming more and more stretched。

To lead global digital technology governance，On the one hand，my country should continue to promote the construction of the "Digital Silk Road"，While expanding foreign investment，Improve the new infrastructure level of developing countries。By providing digital technology assistance、Given fund loan discounts and other forms，Help developing countries improve the level of digital infrastructure construction，Output China's production capacity、At the same time of promoting technical standards，Efforts to narrow the "access gap" of developing countries and developed countries。On the other hand，my country should strengthen the supply of digital education resource public products，Actively output its own development experience。Encourage developing countries to study through the organization of outstanding talents、Cross -regional communication and other methods，Absorb my country's experience in digital technology，Help developing countries to train professional talents with digital skills。At the same time，Leading to create a global digital education resource public service platform，Digital service (such as online course、Internet training, etc.) Exports to improve digital literacy of people in developing countries，Make up the defects of insufficient basic education and digital training。

　　Digital Trade Governance: Vision based on the construction of digital trade rules

The booming development of digital trade has brought about increasingly growing governance needs，But the formulation of rules in the field is still lagging。Current，WTO does not formulate a multilateral agreement that specifically regulates digital trade，left a lot of regulatory vacuum，and the existing rules are more inclined to developed countries，It cannot fully reflect the interests of the majority of developing countries including my country，There is serious inequality、Unbalanced phenomenon。Due to the lack of a multilateral Bet365 app download digital trade agreement，Many regional trade agreements have been included in the relevant terms of e -commerce，But it has also exacerbated the fragmentation trend of global digital trade governance。

Although global digital trade governance has been accelerating in recent years，But there are still major problems。On the one hand，Developed countries and developing countries have a large difference in key issues。Differences based on the development level of digital technology and digital trade，Different interest appeals in developed countries and developing countries，It is difficult to reach a consensus for a long time on many key issues。Overall，The developed economy focuses on creating an open digital trade environment，Proposal of cross -border data free flow，Pay attention to intellectual property protection and technological innovation; while developing the development of economics focusing on improving the level of e -commerce convenience，Emphasize the importance of its own development needs，Pay attention to network security and national security，A relatively doubt stance on the Internet open。On the other hand，Internal countries have not reached a consensus on many issues。In the negotiation of digital trade rules，The level of digital trade development in developing countries、Similar stages of the place，Proposal and appeal should also be similar，But because of the poor governance system、Insufficient communication and coordination and other reasons，There are few voices in developing countries and dispersed，It is difficult to form a joint force in the negotiation to expand the impact of its own demand，As a result, developed countries have long been dominated for a long time。

To lead global digital trade governance，On the one hand，my country should seek a cooperation mode for mutually beneficial and win -win with developed countries。my country as a representative of developing countries，It should be based on the advanced advantage of digital trade，Improve the right to speak in the formulation of global digital trade rules; seek the same difference in digital trade negotiations，Properly handle contradictions and differences with developed economies such as the United States and Europe，Priority breakthroughs in economic issues that are more eased in contradictions，Maintain the interests of the majority of developing countries。On the other hand，my country should Bet365 lotto review be committed to condensing the rules and consensus of developing countries。Relying on the construction of the “Belt and Road” initiative and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization、BRICS countries and other regional cooperation mechanisms，Strengthen communication and communication within developing countries，Digging the common rules of the developing countries，Formation of rules consensus in digital trade negotiations。Therefore, the overall power of developing countries，Get rid of the "regulation formulation dependence" of Western countries，Improve international discourse rights in the field。

　　Digital Financial Governance: Take the improvement of digital financial supervision as the starting point

The development of digital finance is innovative financial products、Reconstruction business process、At the same time of improving the quality of service，It also changed the mechanism of financial operation，Bring new technical risks and operating risks，It may even cause a systemic financial crisis。But，Traditional financial supervision system is difficult to adapt to intermediary、Decentralized digital financial transaction status quo，It is difficult to avoid the risks of decentralized digital financial markets。Therefore，How to strengthen digital financial supervision has become an important global problem。

Since no international organization has established a set of mature and effective international regulatory rules for digital finance，At present, there are major problems in cross -border supervision of digital finance。On the one hand，Digital financial supervision scale of various countries is very different。At present, digital financial supervision is basically implemented in developed countries with severe management，and other countries implement more loose management as the main feature。Different regulatory attitudes of various countries will cause the country where the service target is located to ban the overseas trading platform illegally engaged in Bet365 lotto review cross -border digital financial business in its domestic cooperation，As a result, it is difficult to crack down on digital financial cross -border supervision arbitrage behavior，Even triggering cross -risk infection in the entire financial system。On the other hand，Unified multilateral digital financial regulatory rules seriously missing。Many cross -border digital financial businesses exist in service subjects in one country，Register and operate、The situation of the service object is distributed in another country，But due to the lack of digital financial multilateral supervision rules similar to the Basel Agreement，The regulatory position of this type of business needs to be linked to the multilateral cooperation agreement，illegal responsibility pursuit becomes extremely complicated，Leading the jurisdiction of cross -border digital finance business is prominent，severely reduced the efficiency of international financial supervision。

To lead global digital financial governance，On the one hand，my country should strengthen the international collaboration of digital financial supervision。Relying on World Bank、International Monetary Fund and other international platforms，Strengthen the evaluation and risk monitoring of global fintech development and risk monitoring，Coordinated solving Bet365 lotto review cross -border digital financial regulatory arbitrage problems。At the same time，Establishing digital financial supervision and cooperation and supervision information sharing mechanisms in various countries，Coordinate the requirements for digital financial supervision of various participants，Enhance the consistency of regulatory caliber。On the other hand，my country should explore the construction of a new global regulatory system for digital finance。Technical dependence and long -tail characteristics based on digital finance，On the basis of "Basel Agreement Ⅲ"，Designing digital financial innovation supervision system。In the design process, consider the synergy of regulatory frameworks and regulatory indicators in various countries，Seek a wide range of consensus from the international community，So as to provide reference for the jurisdiction of the digital finance business。

　　Digital Security Governance: Based on improving the data governance system

The development of data transactions has impact on traditional international trade rules，In terms of the core topic of data cross -border flow，Differential interests of the country cannot be reconciled，International Digital Safety Supervision Standardization Framework lags behind practice。Obviously，Even in the international agreement and the international conventions are common today，It is not realistic to go through a convention of digital security governance bet365 Play online games with quite universal digital security governance。In this background，Digital conflicts between the country intensified，International digital security and stability is difficult to maintain。

In reality，Digital security governance status is not satisfactory。On the one hand，Difficulties in law enforcement of cross -border data。Generally speaking，The scope of exercise of the authority of a digital security regulatory agency of a country is subject to its sovereign scope without enjoying extraterritorial supervision authority，Therefore，If some legal problems occur in the flow of cross -border data，Volume overseas in domestic law、Conflict Law Choice and Overseas Examination will have great controversy and uncertainty，As a result, it is difficult for the country to implement a reasonable and effective supervision of illegal cross -border data behavior，Data security issues。On the other hand，Establishment of data governance and regulatory difficulties for global。Global data flow rules negotiations may take considerable time and cost，It is often difficult to reach a few years or even more than ten years。other，Value orientation of various countries in data governance is large，Different interest demands，It is difficult to build a unified regulation that can satisfy all parties。In this case，Data governance in the international community is all rows.，It is easy to cause contradictions and conflicts，Serious threats to global digital security。

To lead global digital security governance，On the one hand，my country should explore the establishment of data supervision and cooperation agencies for the establishment of regions。Under the establishment of a global data regulatory agency, under the actual conditions of great obstacles，You can promote the dialogue and cooperation of data supervision departments in various countries through the establishment of data supervision and cooperation agencies of regional intergave，to improve communication efficiency，Reduce the cost of regulatory cooperation，Provide the participants with an information interoperability sharing、International data supervision information exchange platform for law enforcement and cooperation。On the other hand，my country should try to promote the mutual recognition of data governance regulations and mode integration of data governance and regulation。Bet365 app download The current representative model is based on the European Union.、Regulatory mode recognized as the principle of "adequateness"，There is also an industry self -discipline model established by the Asia -Pacific Economic Cooperation Organization。These two modes have played a role for a long time and have the conditions for mutual recognition and integration，Promoting the integration of the two in the system that can promote data flow regulations，It is expected to promote the formation of global data cross -border regulatory standards。

　　(Author unit: Zhejiang University China Digital Trade Research Institute)