It is generally considered，We need to take responsibility for what we do，But some private activities are not the scope of accountability。What kind of control do we have for our own thoughts，What is the responsibility for it?

Obviously，Not all ideological fragments belong to the category of moral responsibility。If a person who is experiencing a mental illness，Take the doctor as a camouflage enemy soldier，So they may not have to be responsible for their own ideas。The question is not whether we are always responsible for our own thoughts，and whether we have been responsible for our own thoughts。If we do have a certain degree of responsibility for our own thoughts，So we have the conditions for responsible for this responsibility and how we should exercise this responsibility，I will have some questions。These problems will bring us into a maze。It is full of difficult problems in this maze，And these problems are the key to exploring the nature of thought。

Russell once said，"Many people would rather die if they would rather die; in fact，They do practical practice "。Here，Russell distinguishes two ideas: passive thoughts and controllable thoughts。bet365 Play online games Thoughts sometimes passive，Just like people may find themselves in a splendid state，It may also be touched by the fleeting idea of ​​life。Russell is not concerned about this sense of thought，Instead, understanding thoughts as an activity that can be controlled to some extent。Russell's interest lies in the thinking itself。But how much control do we have?

Thinking can be controlled in different ways。In some cases，People need to control thinking activities through rules or methods。For example，Beginning from 200 from 200。We have the countdown from 200，Keep the rhythm to perform this task，No。But the multiples of the countdown to 7 starting from 200 and unconventional daily controlling thinking activities。But if we are asked a question that has not been considered in advance，So we may need to think about which topics involved in this problem，What are the aspects to organize answers from which aspects to。We will ask ourselves this question，Then the material of the organization appears in the mind。Sometimes I can't remember anything in my head，Sometimes I subconsciously think of some understandable things。But no matter what，No algorithm or secret，Let us follow and generate the need for the need。

Under normal circumstances，Consciousness seems to only play the role of "watching people"，Make bet365 Play online games sure our thinking will not deviate from the theme。But，As Jonathan Schooler said，Humans perform poorly in controlling the tendency of God。In a study，Skul asked the subject to read a designated article。Then，Every time in a while，Researchers will randomly check the subject，See if they are gone，Or is you still reading an article in the instructions。Skul found，A subject should often go when you should read it，and they usually do not realize that they have already gone away。

Human beings are not good at focusing on a specific task，And there is evidence to indicate，The direction of trying to control people's thought flow may also be counterproductive。Daniel Wegner team has done a study，They ask the subjects not to think about white bears in five minutes。As a result, I found，The subjects who accepted this instructions than those who had received special instructions to think about the white bear reported more about the idea of ​​white bears。Experimental results indicate，Attempting to suppress an idea will be counterproductive。Wigner calls this phenomenon "ironic ideological control"。Ironics control research has obvious correlation with various pathological thoughts (such as obsessive -compulsive disorder)。So，Although we can consciously control the direction of our thoughts，But this bet365 Play online games control that we have is by no means unlimited。To some extent，We are relatively weak in control over our own ideological direction。So，Maybe we only need to have less responsibility for our own thoughts。

Similar to what kind of controlling the thinking may be slightly broad，We transition to more specific questions，That is, what kind of control we have in our beliefs。Those who hold the position of "belief and only theory" think，We can directly control the formation of faith to some extent。Few beliefs that the wishes who are the most believe that they can control their beliefs as they want。Obviously，Believe that everything is ridiculous。On the contrary，Believers who are described by the Beliards Theory claims that we have a certain degree of control to determine whether to accept those propositions that are not decisive for us，The authenticity of these propositions is not determined by the evidence。

There are obvious differences between perception and belief。Although people can control where they look at，But when people look at a specific object，He basically cannot control his thoughts on what he sees。So，In this sense，Perception is passive，What happened to people accidentally。Comparison of comparison，Thought seems not exactly passive。In Kant's words，Thought seems to be "spontaneous"。

Let's consider the following bet365 best casino games situations: a close friend is accused of crime，The disadvantage of this friend is not a decisive，but it is quite obvious。At the same time，Friends claim that she is innocent，Those who know her character will think she is telling the truth。Under this situation，Will we try to determine what to believe? In this context，We may tend to use decision -making language，But in fact，The formation of faith is rarely accompanied by experience selection。Is it really an individual who decides to believe in the innocence of friends? on the contrary，We just find that we have some opinion on this。Maybe we found that we were convinced of evidence that she was unfavorable，or found that she is sure she must tell the truth，or what should I believe。But no matter which one of these possibilities，The formation of faith does not seem to be acting like raising hands or opening eyes and closed eyes.。

Various incentives seem to lack control of the formation of faith。For example，The theater can inspire us to watch the show drama，But we cannot convince us in the same way to believe that this is a good drama。This is not a recognition of motivation factors that can affect the formation of faith，However, these factors are not as stimulating as economic stimulus。

Although the formation of faith may not be directly controlled by us，But there are various forms of indirect control of our beliefs。bet365 Play online games For example，We can criticize the concept that those potential candidates who are faith and presented to us。We can take a step back from the seemingly reasonable proposition，Whether the evidence provided is really as powerful as it looks like。We can explore the novelty of our own environment，Therefore, the topic that we do not understand form a new belief。When people read newspapers，The belief discussed is not about what he sees，but the theme of media reports。By choosing to expose yourself to some kind of information instead of other information，People have applied an indirect control of their own world viewing outlines。

"People are just a reed，The weakest of all things，But it is a reed that can be considered "，Blaise Pascal's famous famous saying，At the same time, people's small and noble。This is the case，Human beings are glad to have at least some comfort in the vast universe。Human thinking ability may be far better than other creatures，But it can never evolve unlimited。No matter where the limits of human thought，We are still far from this boundary。A paragraph of Pascar's quoting here as the end: "All our dignity lies in thought。We must rely on it to improve ourselves，instead of relying on the space and time that we cannot fill up。So，Let us think hard。”

　　bet365 live casino games